View Full Version : The coach you prefer.
ilovefotball
16 Mar 2006, 05:17 PM
if there are 2 coach
One like Jose mourinho, who seems very strict to his players, and plays very balancing football or sometimes a bit defencive, but again gets results in his favour.
the other like Frank Rijkaard, who seems very soft and supportive to his players , plays attacking football and still manages to get results in his favour.
both of them are great coach with different tactics.
So, who who would you preferto coach your club,the one like Mourinho or the one like Frank Rijkaard?
Rakim_22
16 Mar 2006, 11:11 PM
Rijkaard by a mile. Only cuz hes Dutch and was one hell of a player.
Henry Porter
16 Mar 2006, 11:22 PM
Who the heck would choose a choice like Mourinho? Rijkaard gets results with beatiful football. What more could you want from a coach?
impalemeplz
17 Mar 2006, 08:19 AM
both need relatively great players to succeed. remember rijkaard blew it with one of the most talented dutch squads on paper on top form. subbing on that psv forward for zenden. wtf! seedorf for bergkamp:rolleyes:
i would never ever have mourinho as my manager. the reasons are plentiful.
tomwilhelm
17 Mar 2006, 10:03 AM
Jose Mourinho is a boil on the ass of world football.
leg_breaker
17 Mar 2006, 04:10 PM
Rijkaard doesn't get results, Ronaldinho, Eto etc get results. It seems that Rijkaard's main contribution was bringing in the fancy players, his record at Rotterdam makes that pretty clear.
On the other hand Mourinho puts together teams, with no out and out star players, grafters rather than showmen.
Duck Manson
17 Mar 2006, 04:39 PM
Jose Mourinho is a boil on the ass of world football.hahaha damn id buy you a beer any day man
schafer
17 Mar 2006, 07:11 PM
both need relatively great players to succeed. remember rijkaard blew it with one of the most talented dutch squads on paper on top form. subbing on that psv forward for zenden. wtf! seedorf for bergkamp:rolleyes:
i would never ever have mourinho as my manager. the reasons are plentiful.
I beg to differ, I think Mourinho proved his credentials by winning the CL with Porto, and his success with Chelsea cannot take that away. I think Rijkaard needs to win the CL before I'd pick him.
ForeverRed
17 Mar 2006, 10:23 PM
Ottmar Hitzfeld
Henry Porter
17 Mar 2006, 11:12 PM
Rijkaard doesn't get results, Ronaldinho, Eto etc get results. It seems that Rijkaard's main contribution was bringing in the fancy players, his record at Rotterdam makes that pretty clear.
On the other hand Mourinho puts together teams, with no out and out star players, grafters rather than showmen.
The original post appeared to me to remove results from the equation as s/he said they both get results. I thought the post was asking about solely style.
dor02
18 Mar 2006, 05:37 AM
If I wanted results, I'd pick Mourinho but I prefer style so Rijkaard gets my vote.
I prefer Capello more than both of them put together. His teams get the result and when they can, they do play with style.
kakaboypuf redded
18 Mar 2006, 05:41 AM
both need relatively great players to succeed. remember rijkaard blew it with one of the most talented dutch squads on paper on top form. subbing on that psv forward for zenden. wtf! seedorf for bergkamp:rolleyes:
i would never ever have mourinho as my manager. the reasons are plentiful.
How do you mean blew it? If anything, the players blew it themselves by missing 2 penalties in regular time (and 2 in the shootout)
what a bs comment
kakaboypuf redded
18 Mar 2006, 05:43 AM
Rijkaard doesn't get results, Ronaldinho, Eto etc get results. It seems that Rijkaard's main contribution was bringing in the fancy players, his record at Rotterdam makes that pretty clear.
Ah, so when the team wins, credit goes to the players, but when the team loses, fault is on the coach?
makes real sense :rolleyes:
afgrijselijkheid
18 Mar 2006, 05:47 AM
Rijkaard doesn't get results, Ronaldinho, Eto etc get results. It seems that Rijkaard's main contribution was bringing in the fancy players, his record at Rotterdam makes that pretty clear.
On the other hand Mourinho puts together teams, with no out and out star players, grafters rather than showmen.
oh so his record at barca is out the window, but you do want to judge him on his time at then-second division sparta?
worst. credibility. ever.
afgrijselijkheid
18 Mar 2006, 05:49 AM
remember rijkaard blew it with one of the most talented dutch squads on paper on top form
right now, i'm trying to decide exactly how much of my opinion towards your opinion i can share without getting carded
ok... i'm gonna go with: come back to the discussion when you get that clue i'm gonna mail you
The Potter
18 Mar 2006, 05:50 AM
For my team Mourinho. He may be a twat but he's a funny twat who'll get results.
impalemeplz
19 Mar 2006, 11:36 AM
The original post appeared to me to remove results from the equation as s/he said they both get results. I thought the post was asking about solely style.
well its clear rijkaard was very passionate in his youth but has mellowed.
mourinho is a twat.
i want that french guy coaching rangers.
impalemeplz
19 Mar 2006, 11:38 AM
How do you mean blew it? If anything, the players blew it themselves by missing 2 penalties in regular time (and 2 in the shootout)
what a bs comment
yes the dutch players blew it with penalties but the substituions sucked ass too. rijkaard lost his head after the players were not getting it done. he gave up after kluivert missed in the 2nd half. you could see him turn to his assistants bewildered.
ilovefotball
20 Mar 2006, 09:54 AM
When i started this thread i wanted to know which coach you would prefer for your club, it might be big or small with good finacial condition or bad. You have to choose the coach who can bring very good environment in the club both off and on the pitch.
when we talk about person there is no doubt that many of you will choose Rijkaard but i wanted to know the coach you would prefer and you want to bring to your club to see your club winning many trophies.
impalemeplz
20 Mar 2006, 10:24 AM
When i started this thread i wanted to know which coach you would prefer for your club, it might be big or small with good finacial condition or bad. You have to choose the coach who can bring very good environment in the club both off and on the pitch.
when we talk about person there is no doubt that many of you will choose Rijkaard but i wanted to know the coach you would prefer and you want to bring to your club to see your club winning many trophies.
i was just listing rijkaards big fault where as mourinho has many including bad subs, the first leg with SWP when down to 10 men LOLOL. rijkaard is an easy choice over mourinho.