View Full Version : Should Rasiak start for Spurs
Joe_Sanchez
01 Feb 2006, 07:08 AM
Even with Mido unavailable, should Rasiak start ahead of either Keane or Defoe?
andylovesoccer
01 Feb 2006, 09:05 AM
Where is the "Hell No-he should change his name to Rat-Shiat" option?
cdmphy
01 Feb 2006, 09:07 AM
You can't be serious?
Spur_Forever
01 Feb 2006, 10:03 AM
Goal machine! Lol !
THFC1
01 Feb 2006, 10:19 AM
He shouldn't be ahead of Barnard or El Hamdaoui.
Mr. Bee
01 Feb 2006, 10:36 AM
Skysports summed it up best last night in their player ratings:
Grzegorz Rasiak
Marginally better than playing with ten men
And that's a real, real stretch
THFC1
01 Feb 2006, 10:47 AM
Skysports summed it up best last night in their player ratings:
Grzegorz Rasiak
Marginally better than playing with ten men
Thats what the Tottenham supporters were singing before Dawson got sent off.
ox utd
01 Feb 2006, 11:21 AM
uh, no.
tomas_brolin
01 Feb 2006, 02:39 PM
who voted yes????? show yourselves!
Alexander Ovechkin
01 Feb 2006, 02:42 PM
I voted NO
SpursGlory
01 Feb 2006, 02:47 PM
Ummm NO. After the Fulham game the verdict is clearly in.
Some posters on the Spurs BBC board have made a good point about Rasiak starting in front of Defoe impacting Defoe's attitude. This is dangerous... the last thing we want is Defoe to leave because of rubbish Rasiak. The more Defoe is on the field the more impact he will make... MJ is making a grave mistake keeping him on the bench.
sendorange
01 Feb 2006, 05:17 PM
He makes me pine for Andy Booth.
CelticOnFire
01 Feb 2006, 05:35 PM
To say Rasiak is useless is giving him too much credit he does not deserve.
THFC1
01 Feb 2006, 06:25 PM
He makes me pine for Andy Booth.
LOL i was thinking that, i can't believe that i do really think Doherty is better than someone.
Bring back Ginger Pele :D
The Double
01 Feb 2006, 06:31 PM
What a great thread.
jrob_blue
01 Feb 2006, 07:27 PM
I don't understand why, if Martin is so intent on not playing Keane and Defoe together, he keeps using a 4-4-2 when Rasiak clearly should not even be an option for the reserves. Surely Robbie in the middle of a 4-3-3 or as the lone striker in a 4-5-1 would not be much worse. Especially with the additions of Ghaly and Murphy in regards to the 4-5-1.
tomas_brolin
01 Feb 2006, 08:08 PM
well the vision is clear.. for the time being... barnard should be backup striker since rasiak sucks... and barnard gets it by default since el hammadoui is on loan now...
lastly.. what is rasiak's salary??
oh also.. is jol strict on the 4-4-2 formation?? cause i think a 4-3-1-2 would suit us well... even if we have to play rasiak....
THFC1
01 Feb 2006, 08:56 PM
lastly.. what is rasiak's salary??
Whatever it is we don't have to give him a goal bonus :rolleyes:
OrlandoSPUR
02 Feb 2006, 10:36 PM
...should he start for Spurs again? ******** no.
LedleybetterthanSol
03 Feb 2006, 01:54 AM
Rasiak should piss off and save himself some dignity.