PDA

View Full Version : Muslim televangelists - good or bad?


DJPoopypants
05 Jan 2006, 03:32 PM
Interesting article about a tv preacher who is more influential than Oprah (?)

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article336386.ece

Khaled is the Arab world's first Islamic tele-evangelist, a digital age Billy Graham who has fashioned himself into the anti-Bin Laden, using the barrier-breaking power of satellite TV and the internet to turn around a generation of lost Muslim youth.

Khaled, 38, defies the stereotype of the Islamic preacher. In his Cairo office it would be easy to mistake him for a City banker. No flowing robes for him. He wears a hand-tailored cream suit, an open-necked sky-blue shirt,brown loafers and a Bulgari watch. The accountant-turned-preacher shifts easily between the worlds of religion and business.

There is more than a touch of the thespian in Khaled, and he is well aware of the power of his words to motivate. His prime target is the youth of the Arab world, who feel that they are second-class citizens in a world dominated by the United States and its values. To these young people he has a tough message about the destructive force of self-pity. "We Muslims are living as parasites on the world. Our problem is that we have got used to taking without ever giving," he says. "Don't tell us it is a Western conspiracy against us, it is not."

A month before, Khaled was in London when the terror attacks killed 52 people. "This," he hisses, "is nowhere in Islam. If anyone kills children or women, this is not acceptable not only in Islam, in the Jewish faith, in Christianity, in all the religions."

Khaled's words are music to the ears of Western interests. But while the preacher might be hip, he is deeply conservative.

very interesting. I guess it does answer the one perpetual question about where are the muslim leaders denouncing acts of terror - we got one of the biggest right here.

He sure does sound like a televangelist - showy, crowd-pleasing, minimal formal religious training. And what do people think of his message - terrorism bad, the west bad, blame the west bad, headscarves good, (saudi arabian millionaire backing very good) ?

Hard Karl
05 Jan 2006, 04:20 PM
The true televangelist test is if he wears gold cufflinks while asking for money.


I'm gonna guess with the description of his clothing that at least one of those criteria is met.

fatbastard
05 Jan 2006, 04:28 PM
I would have to say ALL televangelists are bad, regardless of their affiliation.

DoctorJones24
06 Jan 2006, 12:50 AM
Fascinating stuff...nice catch. The rejection of self-pity alongside the warped veiling stance.

Lots of moderate Muslims defend the scarf though. I saw Sara Suleri make a similar (though less aggressive) point a few years ago at a conference with Rushdie and Juan Cole on the panel with her. I think it was Rushdie who pushed her on this, and she got a little testy.

The idea that it's somehow a liberating symbol--it's BS though. If feminist Muslims want to now appropriate the veil for their own purposes--that's fine. (Gays and black Americans have done this with language) But let's not pretend the veil comes from a place of liberation.

DJPoopypants
06 Jan 2006, 11:02 AM
I really found this to be an article that inspired complex reactions.

Say no to terrorism? Woo-hoo - that's just what we wanted to hear!
He's more popular than Oprah? Good - a more rational message is getting through

On the other hand, he is described as very similar to the televangelists that were disgraced in america, and, well, a lot of the american televangelists that remain are still quite wacky (Pat Robertson..). It makes you wonder if any good comes out of charismatic religious leaders, as they tend to stroke religious fervor when we could use a little less blind adherance to religious leaders these days.

And of course once someone takes the veil of his wife and she has more makeup than Tammy Faye Baker...