Texas Longhorns :: National Champions

[DeigoRedD]

I'm a Texas transplant from Seattle.

The only team in Texas that I have true allegiance to is FC Dallas.

The rest of 'em? Eh...I couldn't care less.

Though statistics do tell a lot what it boils down to is the aforementioned bottom line...

Head to head. Face to face. Toe to toe. The Longhorns and The Trojans did battle. On the day that mattered, the day of the Rose Bowl, The Longhorns were the better team. The Longhorns came out on top.

[prymetyme]

yeah you said it rihgt, i agree with that.

At least I have enough closure to admit it:o :(

[johno]

Apparently the beautiful game has taught you nothing...

Bottom line. The better team always finds a way to have the winning score. It might not be pretty. It may rip your heart out. It might not be right but it is the way it is.

I know plenty about American football tyvm.

In all honesty, did the best team win the FA Cup last year?

[Walter3000]

you might be right, but I think that statisticly wise USC was the better team. Of course im biased since im a USC legacy, and your biased beause you live in fort worth. I think ive comes to terms with the loss and am able to talk about it without dying again, I think if you look at that game Texas was better but for the season USC was.

Sound like that sore loser Matt Leinhart.

Quick question, how can a team that wins one national championship be a dynasty?

[prymetyme]

know the facts first. We're AP 2 Time national champions.

I didnt even bring it up I never said they were a dynasty. But they were for 3 years. The lost in 2006 :D

Matt Leinhart's not a sore loser, he said he thought he was the better team and he stuck to his players. Charlie Weis also said he thought his team was a better team and he certainly isnt a sore loser.

[Walter3000]

"I thought the offense did everything we could to win"

Teammates shouldnt point the finger, eh Peyton?