PDA

View Full Version : According to Amy at US Soccer


Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8

JoeSoccerFan
16 Dec 2005, 05:21 PM
However, all of the guys I know are going for the soccer not really a European vacation (although I'm betting they sold it to their wives that way). Just my anecdotal evidence added to the discussion.
That's exactly how I sold it to my wife. Soccer first, vacation second. She decided to stay home for the good of all. That's why I love her.


How arrogant! Just because you call yourself a member of "Sam's Army" somehow you have more of a right to a ticket than other people? I've followed USSoccer since the mid-70s but never am close enough to go to a qualifier. Now I get a chance to go to Germany and see the US and all you people can do is bitch about how people like me don't deserve it because we're not in your prissy little army. Get a life.
I think you miss the point. Belonging to a "prissy little army" isn't the question. Instead, it's supporters (regardless if they stand in "prissy little army" section) who attend the games that USSF is selling is the question.

I've lived in Lubbock, Texas and Tucson, Arizona and didn't have the funds or the free time to travel as others did. I watched EVERY game I could get on TV, followed others on the internet, and recently joined the discussions on here. I did get to some games when the WC was here, but couldn't afford to travel to where the US was playing so I went to some games in Dallas (hitched a ride, slept on a friend's floor). Are you really suggesting that because I didn't have the means or time to attend qualifiers that now I should step aside for others? You are being an elitist snob and no, I won't excuse you.
Every individual/family decides their priorities in spending their time and money. You have decided that you would prefer NOT to spend your money on domestic USSF games. OK, that's your decision. However, I'm offended for you to state that because other's budget/save and make the WCQ (and other games) a priority that their elitist snobs! That's crap and offensive. If you had the initiative, there were 3 recent matches (SLC/ALB/Hou or Dal) within a day's drive time. Would it cost you time and money? Yes. Would it be harder than sitting on your arse in front of the TV? Yes.


It's elitists like you that have the resources (read: MONEY) to go to mutliple qualifiers. Not everyone has that luxury. Some of us, for varying reasons, choose to pick when and where we will spend our precious dollars on US Soccer. Saving for 4 years to watch the World Cup, while forgoing qualifiers, may be a choice people have to make because they don't have the money and free time you obviously do.
See above about priorities. From DC, CBus (6 hours) for Mexico, Hartford (8 hours) for TnT, let alone GC (4 hours). If you wanted to you could get a bunch of friends (or other BS) to cut costs.

For example, I slept in the Cbus parking lot with my travel companions to cut cost for the Mex game. I've slept in a rest area to go to the England game in Chicago. Comfortable - not so much.

The idea that people in supporters groups should have first crack at tickets for USMNT games in Germany (or anywhere else for that matter) is a load of crap.

As you can see, I disagree. Why would USSF not want to reward the people that support it the most? Heck, Mike I know that you were at Cbus (for Mex). Would DCU sell me your seats because I sent it in before you? No, they'd offer me a seat in another section that hasn't been taken. It's about treating your most loyal customers well. It's not to say, for those unable to attend fewer games, you can't come. However, we going to take care of our most loyal customers first.


I found as I read through the points that I felt for both arguments, but I gotta go with the above in the end.

As was pointed out earlier, cost is relative. And so is freedom. Hell, I'm fairly poor in the grand scheme of things. I can't drop $500 or $1000 without a lot of planning and saving. I realize that some of these games could be had on the cheep, but that brings up freedom. I could have driven to Ohio from east Georgia for USA/Mexico and gotten off without too much cash out of pocket. But that was my weekend with the kids. They win. If I was still in my 20's, I wouldn't have any responsibilities keeping me from games (though they don't come to the Southeast too often). And I know that some of us who are older might still move Heaven and Earth to make the games. But when I can make and I've hoped and prayed for that day, I don't want to find out that I can't 'cause somebody else has got dibs.
I can't drop $500/$1000 without a lot of planning either. But it's not necessary to spend a lot of money - if you're frugual and you make it a priority. If it's not a priority, ok - but don't tell me that you have supported the team as much as others (and I'm not talking about myself).

The guys from Minnesota are absolutely amazing! They show up at all of the games and the last time I looked they haven't got a WCQ recently. U19 women's tourny couple of years ago????

As far as location, East Georgia isn't too far from Bham (Guat). If you really wanted to go, it'd mean taking a day off for travel and the initiative to hook up with others in Atlanta to cut costs. The Guatemalan fans from Georgia showed up - did you?


Maybe what USSF should do is keep a database of registered fans and issue each a ranking, based on the number of games attended and tickets purchased, amount of items bought from the USSOCCERSTORE and the number of minutes spent surfing the USSF website. The people with the highest rankings would get priority for all tickets, and in turn would be required to buy a minimum number of tickets for alll qualifiers/friendlies, etc. A good number would be 4 tickets per game - you have to buy them, regardless of whether you can go or not. Important fans need to pony up to show their support. Based on these rankings, tickets would be allocated for future games including the World Cup, and would be passed down from generation to generation, just like Master's Tickets, NFL Season tickets, and antique furniture. Wouldn't that be great?


Now, I really like your idea - even though I know you meant it sarcastically. However, I would base it upon games attended. Nor the compulsary purchasing of tickets.

There's no way that the USSF should do anything for Germany (it wouldn't be fair). However, directly after the WC, the USSF should announce a plan for South Africa (and other high demand games, i.e., Mexico). As an aside, I brought up South Africa with my wife today and RIGHT NOW she thinks she may want to go for that one. Need to start saving in July 2006.

Back to my rant -
Sam's Army should set up a ticketing system (ok, stop laughing - they can't even sell T-shirts, scarves, etc). Then, they could order a block of tickets from USSF and distribute before general population.

Just my opinion. I hope to see all of you in Germany.

FC Tallavana
16 Dec 2005, 05:25 PM
You, and the Arsenal fans in question received services for their money- it was not just blindly invested- You did see the England and Cbus games did yo not, don't act like you've done American soccer a favor. Listen, I've been to alot of games since 94, but paying for those shouldn't give me special rights. i poad to go to those games, and I got what a I paid for, the experience of those games, not an inflated sense of self worth. As far as the brokers go, it's not so bad for an arsenal game, it's probboaly double the price, which is alot, but not catastrophic, the WC brokers, on the other hand are charging catastrophic price, 400ish euros for a group game. That's the difference between one game and six for me, which is a big deal- that's not something that available to everyone, regardless of 'dedication to the cause' especially when you factor in the price of the trip in the first place.
You knew when you went to chicago and Ohio that a) you weren't buying anything more than a seat in the stadium- so stop asking for more
and b) you could still go to germany.
For many it's not both, but either or. And i'd take germany every time.

You are correct that going to several games means nothing. My point is that it should.

FC Tallavana
16 Dec 2005, 05:48 PM
It's elitists like you that have the resources (read: MONEY) to go to mutliple qualifiers. Not everyone has that luxury. Some of us, for varying reasons, choose to pick when and where we will spend our precious dollars on US Soccer. Saving for 4 years to watch the World Cup, while forgoing qualifiers, may be a choice people have to make because they don't have the money and free time you obviously do.

Maybe what USSF should do is keep a database of registered fans and issue each a ranking, based on the number of games attended and tickets purchased, amount of items bought from the USSOCCERSTORE and the number of minutes spent surfing the USSF website. The people with the highest rankings would get priority for all tickets, and in turn would be required to buy a minimum number of tickets for alll qualifiers/friendlies, etc. A good number would be 4 tickets per game - you have to buy them, regardless of whether you can go or not. Important fans need to pony up to show their support. Based on these rankings, tickets would be allocated for future games including the World Cup, and would be passed down from generation to generation, just like Master's Tickets, NFL Season tickets, and antique furniture. Wouldn't that be great?

And for the record, I donate several hundred dollars a year to the USSF via the Combined Federal Campaign. I never thought it should qualify me for special treatment.


FWIW, I'm nowhere near being made of money. That said, money has never really been my major obstacle to attending matches. The number one issue that keeps me (and I'm guessing others) from attending matches is...free time.

That is why I only attended three matches this past year and spent so much money doing it (last minute travel = $$$). So, don't assume that a system rewarding regulars is biased toward people with money because people with money typically have to bust their ass for it and cannot get off work to travel around the country 10+ times per year. I happen to fall somewhere in the middle (some money & some free time) so I get to attend a few matches, but nearly as many as I'd like.

If you (or anyone else reading this) find yourself with some money but little time, be creative and work a game into some other event (visit family, vacation, business trip, etc.). If you have planty of time but little money, figure out a way to save up to see a match. Most people will have a game or two played close enough to them that a match can be seen for less than a $100 investment. If that is too much money for you, you better hope your cable doesn't get cut off next June, because you're gonna rely upon that to watch the WC. If you have plenty of time and plenty of money (the Drew Careys among us) the world is your oyster and I hope to see you in Germany...where you can buy me a beer!

El-Professor
16 Dec 2005, 07:06 PM
I apologize for the name calling (snobs, prissy army) and any suggestion that I am lashing out at the Richies. My point, and one echoed by many good fans here, is that just because you prioritize, spend money, and give up free time to see quals and friendlies doesn't mean crap when it comes to buying tickets for the next game. You bought a ticket to the game you went to and no others. As I've said to people while waiting in the cold for tickets to other sporting events: "get your ass back in line". This sense of entitlement is not befitting of my countrymen.

FC Tallavana
16 Dec 2005, 07:56 PM
I apologize for the name calling (snobs, prissy army) and any suggestion that I am lashing out at the Richies. My point, and one echoed by many good fans here, is that just because you prioritize, spend money, and give up free time to see quals and friendlies doesn't mean crap when it comes to buying tickets for the next game. You bought a ticket to the game you went to and no others. As I've said to people while waiting in the cold for tickets to other sporting events: "get your ass back in line". This sense of entitlement is not befitting of my countrymen.

As I've said before...

You are right, it doesn't mean crap. But, many of us believe it should. In this debate I think it would be wise for USSF to err on the side of the regular ticket buyers.

nowherenova
16 Dec 2005, 08:01 PM
We're all goin' boys- you snobs and blue-collar boys alike can celebrate before Match 1 in Gelsenkirchen together. Prost!

MikeLastort2
16 Dec 2005, 09:31 PM
So let me get this straight. There are people who have been to games in the past and because they've been to games in the past they feel that it somehow entitles them to have a better chance at buying tickets for games in the future than people who haven't been to games in the past. Is that what I'm to understand here?

Why? Has the USMNT started issuing season tickets or something?

:rolleyes:

I've attended about 20 USMNT games. Hell, maybe 30. Maybe more. I've lost count. Just because I have I don't feel that I should be entitled to have a better chance at buying tickets for games next summer. Who the ******** am I to feel like US Soccer owes me something? I go of my own volition.

I've read some really stupid things in the USMNT fora. The idea that veteran fans should have a better chance to buy tickets than newbies is one of the dumbest.

roadkit
16 Dec 2005, 09:33 PM
As I've said before...

You are right, it doesn't mean crap. But, many of us believe it should. In this debate I think it would be wise for USSF to err on the side of the regular ticket buyers.

I've had a chnace to think about this for a few hours. I don't think that straight up, anyone should get priority for tickets just because they went to more friendlies or qualifiers than someone else.

But, I'm a long time season ticket holder for DC United, and as such I do get priority on some tickets (playoffs, DC vs Chelsea, etc.).

So here's an option: USSF sells "season tickets" for the MNT. Here is how it would work: There would be a set number of games (friendlies/tournament qualifiers, etc.) per year that would define a "season". Let's say it's 6 games (as an example). The tickets would guarantee (Based on price) seating in a certain class of seats (or price category, whatever). You pay for the tickets up front like any other season ticket. You pay whether you attend the game or not. Season ticket holders that scalp lose season ticket privileges. But in return, you get front of the line privileges for tickets for the Gold Cup, World Cup, etc.

But it would have to be a big enough "season so people couldn't just buy the cheapest ticket avaliable so they can get guaranteed tickets for the WC.

I'm not saying I would want this option, but at least it would mirror what happens in MLS and other sports.

FC Tallavana
16 Dec 2005, 09:45 PM
So let me get this straight. There are people who have been to games in the past and because they've been to games in the past they feel that it somehow entitles them to have a better chance at buying tickets for games in the future than people who haven't been to games in the past. Is that what I'm to understand here?

Why? Has the USMNT started issuing season tickets or something?

:rolleyes:

I've attended about 20 USMNT games. Hell, maybe 30. Maybe more. I've lost count. Just because I have I don't feel that I should be entitled to have a better chance at buying tickets for games next summer. Who the ******** am I to feel like US Soccer owes me something? I go of my own volition.

I've read some really stupid things in the USMNT fora. The idea that veteran fans should have a better chance to buy tickets than newbies is one of the dumbest.


It may seem dumb to you but it is a pretty common practice the world over.

http://www.thefa.com/England/SeniorTeam/Englandfans/

roadkit
16 Dec 2005, 09:52 PM
It may seem dumb to you but it is a pretty common practice the world over.

http://www.thefa.com/England/SeniorTeam/Englandfans/

If by putting that link in there you think your convincing anyone that the FA has a system where the more games you go to, the better chance you have of getting WC tickets, you're wrong. You get a better chance by paying 70 pounds to join - but you can't join now because they reached their limit. It doesn't have anything to do with how many games you go to.

FC Tallavana
16 Dec 2005, 09:55 PM
If by putting that link in there you think your convincing anyone that the FA has a system where the more games you go to, the better chance you have of getting WC tickets, you're wrong. You get a better chance by paying 70 pounds to join - but you can't join now because they reached their limit. It doesn't have anything to do with how many games you go to.

The FA do have a points sytem that I believe is used for order preference. A guy from Leeds tried to explain it to me at the Chicago game but he was so drunk I couldn't quite make out all the details.

MinnesotaScouser
16 Dec 2005, 10:37 PM
First off, anyone who cares enough about soccer to be on these boards "deserves" a chance to watch the US at the World Cup next summer.

However, it would be an incredible injustice if a guy who has never attended a US match before gets tickets from USSF, and guys like me and JoeSoccerFan who traveled to every qualifier this past year get shut out. That would be crapping on your most loyal traveling supporters.

By the way, please don't be misled by my miniscule number of posts. I've been lurking on these boards for the past 5 years and have enjoyed reading what all you have to say.

Bill63
16 Dec 2005, 11:10 PM
From JoeSoccerFan
Quote:
As far as location, East Georgia isn't too far from Bham (Guat). If you really wanted to go, it'd mean taking a day off for travel and the initiative to hook up with others in Atlanta to cut costs. The Guatemalan fans from Georgia showed up - did you?


Gee Joe, ouch.

Actually, I was there and up to my armpits in little Guatemalans. Great night, not only for the game, but after dodging the thunderstorm, I see this bus pull up outside this ritzy martini bar. I waltz up to take a gander and out pour the Nats. After they file in, I stand there in my circa '93 Nat warm-up jacket and the doorman goes, "Well, you coming?" "Uh, sure." I walk in, drink on the USSF tab, talk to Mooch and Bruce, Ralston, Eddie, Beas, Boco, Gibbs, Hartman, and others. Priceless, as well as one fine buzz!

I've made other matches...

USA/Ukraine @ High Point, NC -high school football field full of holes, lame
USA/Moldova @ Davidson, NC - Reyna on field for 1st time, Vermes cracks
crossbar and gets cut.
USA/Germany @ Jax, FL - Kirovski's last great moment, Eddie Lewis shines for
1st time
USA/Guat @ Bham - see above

plus, WC '94 games in Orlando, I saw every Olympic game in Athens, GA; I've caught the women many times; United in DC; countless Battery games in Ctown, etc., Open Cup matches, College Cup and reg season games all over, and on and on...

Nothing is in my town.

What does this litany(which can be bested by most everyone) qualify me for in the future? Absolutely nothing!

S**T, I'm 42, and you know what, I will be in Germany drinking beer and watching us kick ass because I don't have to forego my chance for anyone.

MikeLastort2
16 Dec 2005, 11:20 PM
It may seem dumb to you but it is a pretty common practice the world over.

http://www.thefa.com/England/SeniorTeam/Englandfans/

So they limit membership to fans who have only attended previous matches?

Don't think so.

Soccer fans claim that they want to build the sport in this country, yet when new fans express an interest in going to games, "veteran" fans try to shut them out. Yeah, that makes sense. Not.

MikeLastort2
16 Dec 2005, 11:24 PM
The FA do have a points sytem that I believe is used for order preference. A guy from Leeds tried to explain it to me at the Chicago game but he was so drunk I couldn't quite make out all the details.

If drunks from Leeds want to keep new fans away from the English national team, then we should definitely take a page from his book and keep new fans away from the US national team.



Look, it's pretty simple. If people want to pay the money and come to ANY US game, they should be able to. Regardless of who was there before them. What some of you are proposing is a system that would only let new fans go to games when old ones die off or something. It's ludicrous.

MikeLastort2
16 Dec 2005, 11:27 PM
First off, anyone who cares enough about soccer to be on these boards "deserves" a chance to watch the US at the World Cup next summer.

However, it would be an incredible injustice if a guy who has never attended a US match before gets tickets from USSF, and guys like me and JoeSoccerFan who traveled to every qualifier this past year get shut out. That would be crapping on your most loyal traveling supporters.

By the way, please don't be misled by my miniscule number of posts. I've been lurking on these boards for the past 5 years and have enjoyed reading what all you have to say.

The funny thing is that I doubt any fans, new or old, are going to get "shut out." There are a lot more tickets than there are fans.

JoeSoccerFan
17 Dec 2005, 12:00 AM
Yes, but no arsehole is bigger than me! :D

...
I've made other matches...
USA/Ukraine @ High Point, NC -high school football field full of holes, lame
USA/Moldova @ Davidson, NC - Reyna on field for 1st time, Vermes cracks
crossbar and gets cut.
USA/Germany @ Jax, FL - Kirovski's last great moment, Eddie Lewis shines for
1st time
USA/Guat @ Bham - see above

plus, WC '94 games in Orlando, I saw every Olympic game in Athens, GA; I've caught the women many times; United in DC; countless Battery games in Ctown, etc., Open Cup matches, College Cup and reg season games all over, and on and on...

Nothing is in my town.

What does this litany(which can be bested by most everyone) qualify me for in the future? Absolutely nothing!

S**T, I'm 42, and you know what, I will be in Germany drinking beer and watching us kick ass because I don't have to forego my chance for anyone.
Wonderful. Sincerely - I mean it (no sarcasm). This is my exact point. A person such as yourself who attends games (thus supports the US team) should have an advantage over someone who decides this is the event worthy of their money.

I hope we can enjoy a beer (or 2) in Germany even though I'm much younger than you (by a year) ;).


Mike - I'm not suggesting that new people should be discouraged from attending. Only that soccer is eventually going to be a difficult ticket. In those times, it would be a shame for those who have supported during the lean years that our support was forgotten/discounted.

Right now, 99% are easy to get tickets. The exception seem to be Mexico, WC, maybe MLS cup. It's going to change.

lebowski2332
17 Dec 2005, 12:10 AM
We are all lucky that our national team does not attract attention (yet) like in most of the world.

One can imagine a time when it will be as unattainable as going to the Super Bowl to see the WC usa team live. All corporate and lots more $ or a huge lottery.

We may torment future generations talking about the good old days; imagine trying to get those Holland tix or Germany tix this summer.

pokemoncards
17 Dec 2005, 12:19 AM
Yes, but no arsehole is bigger than me! :D



are you from england?

Lloyd Heilbrunn
17 Dec 2005, 12:27 AM
So let me get this straight. There are people who have been to games in the past and because they've been to games in the past they feel that it somehow entitles them to have a better chance at buying tickets for games in the future than people who haven't been to games in the past. Is that what I'm to understand here?

Why? Has the USMNT started issuing season tickets or something?

:rolleyes:

I've attended about 20 USMNT games. Hell, maybe 30. Maybe more. I've lost count. Just because I have I don't feel that I should be entitled to have a better chance at buying tickets for games next summer. Who the ******** am I to feel like US Soccer owes me something? I go of my own volition.

I've read some really stupid things in the USMNT fora. The idea that veteran fans should have a better chance to buy tickets than newbies is one of the dumbest.

I went to a qualifier in 1980,therefore I'm entitled to tickets before anybody born in 1981 or later!!!

And the guy who was at US- England in 1950 gets his own skybox......;)