PDA

View Full Version : What Major Power will Flop at the World Cup?


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 12:34 PM
so where does it say "england are unmatched man for man in world football" :rolleyes: it was a question asking whos better then england man for man after some geezer said england dont have the quality, obviously you dont have the intelligence to read properly, so i let you off
Post 73, post 79. Now go off to do whatever it is little trolls or socks like you go and do. STFU.

You are one of the most ignorant, useless posters here at Bigsoccer. You won't even acknowledge your own posts. So sad. Are you like 12 or 13 years old?

simonb_nyc
21 Nov 2005, 12:40 PM
Sherlock, find the post which says "england man for man are unmatched compared to any team in the world", have some inteligience next time, you make yourself look stupid

Er...I'm afraid there's Brazil.

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 12:44 PM
Er...I'm afraid there's Brazil.

He is just a troll. I have been informed about him so I am not taking anything he says seriously. And really reading his posts how could anyone? I figure he is about 12 or 13 and has nothing better to do with his day then make himself look stupid online. Maybe we should hook him up with Metro24freak?

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 12:55 PM
Post 73, post 79. Now go off to do whatever it is little trolls or socks like you go and do. STFU.

You are one of the most ignorant, useless posters here at Bigsoccer. You won't even acknowledge your own posts. So sad. Are you like 12 or 13 years old?

Apart from ronaldinho, Emerson, Players like kaka, Adraino, Ronaldo, Robinho and the likes of Gerrard, Lampard, Owen, Rooney, Beckham, theres not much between them, they are all proven to be offensively effective at the top level, evenly balanced and its who performs best on the day. the england defense is better man for man then brazil which you agreed with. so i dont know what your point is, maybe you should quit being evasive and find that post which says "england are unmatched in world football"

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 01:20 PM
Dida is not a "better" keeper then robinson.

i take the England Centrebacks and a fit G Nelvile and Ashly Cole at left/right back over the brazilians

Lampard / gerrard /,Beckham /Rooney / Owen / J Cole / SWP , as indivual players, can all hold there own to the brazilian options

the only difference is brazil having a quality DM in emerson or giberto
apart from ronaldinho, brazil man for man is not better then england. dont be a bitches jumping on the bandwagan


Apart from ronaldinho Emerson, Players like kaka, Adraino, Ronaldo, Robinho and the likes of Gerrard, Lampard, Owen, Rooney, Beckham, theres not much between them, they are all proven to be offensively effective at the top level, evenly balanced and its who performs best on the day. the england defense is better man for man then brazil which you agreed with. so i dont know what your point is, maybe you should quit being evasive and find that post which says "england are unmatched in world football"

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:26 PM
Apart from ronaldinho, Emerson, Players like kaka, Adraino, Ronaldo, Robinho and the likes of Gerrard, Lampard, Owen, Rooney, Beckham, theres not much between them, they are all proven to be offensively effective at the top level, evenly balanced and its who performs best on the day. the england defense is better man for man then brazil which you agreed with. so i dont know what your point is, maybe you should quit being evasive and find that post which says "england are unmatched in world football"

Already showed you the post, or can't you read now?

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 01:35 PM
Already showed you the post, or can't you read now?


wheres does its say "england are unmatched man for man in world football"

if england "are not good enough" who has a better team man for man then england out of all the 32 teams. you will ignore this post cos you cant answer it.

spoonman
21 Nov 2005, 01:38 PM
Already showed you the post, or can't you read now?

You're very good at waisting your time dude.

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:52 PM
You're very good at waisting your time dude.
Just humoring myself at his expense.

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:53 PM
wheres does its say "england are unmatched man for man in world football"
now comprehend it

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 01:53 PM
stupid bitches, dont come on forums and be evasive to the posts that proove you made wrong calls

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:55 PM
stupid bitches, dont come on forums and be evasive to the posts that proove you made wrong calls
So are you ready to admit that England man for man, all 11 positions, are not equal to Brazil?

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:57 PM
Man for Man, England are not as good as Brazil. They are one of the 32 teams going to Germany next year. So if we go back to that post, there is your answer, Brazil is better.

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 01:58 PM
stupid bitches, dont come on forums and be evasive to the posts that proove you made wrong calls
Are you going to start crying now? Did we upset you?

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 02:02 PM
So are you ready to admit that England man for man, all 11 positions, are not equal to Brazil?

twisting words again i never england are eqaul to brazil in all 11 postions. read the posts properly -

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 02:07 PM
twisting words again i never england are eqaul to brazil in all 11 postions. read the posts properly -
Explain what you meant here then:

if england "are not good enough" who has a better team man for man then england out of all the 32 teams. you will ignore this post cos you cant answer it.

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 02:10 PM
From post 73apart from ronaldinho, brazil man for man is not better then england. dont be a bitches jumping on the bandwagan

There you go. No twisting of words, that is your post. That is what you said.

Care to make a retraction now? So explain what you meant here.

See you made the statements, I called you on them. Now scurry on off to your hole in the wall cause you have been busted and punk'ed.

COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 02:33 PM
From post 73

There you go. No twisting of words, that is your post. That is what you said.

Care to make a retraction now? So explain what you meant here.

See you made the statements, I called you on them. Now scurry on off to your hole in the wall cause you have been busted and punk'ed.

yes Ronaldinho and i also said Emerson. so thats not all 11 players isnt it, do the maths. your hard work, posts 79 and 104

Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 03:31 PM
yes Ronaldinho and i also said Emerson. so thats not all 11 players isnt it, do the maths. your hard work, posts 79 and 104

You said:
apart from ronaldinho, brazil man for man is not better then england. dont be a bitches jumping on the bandwagan

You didn't define which players were or weren't better in this post. See you said it, I showed it. Now toddle on off little boy.

spoonman
21 Nov 2005, 03:33 PM
Is this still going on?

hahaha