View Full Version : What Major Power will Flop at the World Cup?
Pages :
1
2
3
4
[
5]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 06:12 PM
Dida is not a "better" keeper then robinson.
i take the England Centrebacks and a fit G Nelvile and Ashly Cole at left/right back over the brazilians
Lampard / gerrard /,Beckham /Rooney / Owen / J Cole / SWP , as indivual players, can all hold there own to the brazilian options
the only difference is brazil having a quality DM in emerson or giberto
So are you a sock or just an ignorant troll?
If you honestly think that anything you said holds true then you are a sad excuse for a "knowledgable" poster.
Prawn Sandwich
20 Nov 2005, 06:14 PM
You can't really be this stupid can you? Ronaldo and Robinho are as good if not better then Owen and Rooney.
Dida is a better keeper.
GOALKEEPERS:
Dida (AC Milan)
Julio Cesar (Inter Milan)
DEFENDERS:
Alex (PSV Eindhoven)
Cafu (AC Milan)
Cicinho (Sao Paulo)
Roberto Carlos (Real Madrid)
Lucio (Bayern Munich)
Luisao (Benfica)
Juan (Bayer Leverkusen)
Gustavo Nery (Corinthians)
MIDFIELDERS:
Julio Baptista (Real Madrid)
Emerson (Juventus)
Kaka (AC Milan)
Juninho Pernambucano (Lyon)
Renato (Sevilla)
Ricardinho (Santos)
Gilberto Silva (Arsenal)
Ze Roberto (Bayern Munich)
Ronaldinho (Barcalona)
FORWARDS:
Adriano (Inter Milan)
Ronaldo (Real Madrid)
Robinho (Santos)
Ricardo Oliveira (Real Betis)
Go ahead do your match ups, England man for man is not better then Brazil. And Brazil has the hardware to back that up. When/if England wins the WC then you can call them better.
Englands defence is stronger, Brasils midfield and attack are stronger.
Prawn Sandwich
20 Nov 2005, 06:21 PM
After reading this post, I can't believe that people really think the English fans are arrogant pric*s. Not like he takes the piss talking about how most of the fans on the England NT side are typical whining monkeys, predicting an early exit.
Oops - I'm guessing you posted your original comment before you got round to reading the whole thread. Must of sucked to post your drivel and then realise you've proven my point within two posts :p
Then, to just show his complete blindness, he states England will only go out b/c of cheating, both from the refs and the opponents.
:rolleyes: do you ever use your sense of humour or do you just keep it locked up for special occasions?
Eat another sandwich, you stupid prawn. England aren't good enough to win, no matter how many mindless posters you have.
Please enlighten me with your insight and expertise and tell me who actually is good enough to win then.
Prawn Sandwich
20 Nov 2005, 06:22 PM
So are you a sock or just an ignorant troll?
If you honestly think that anything you said holds true then you are a sad excuse for a "knowledgable" poster.
I've been saying for a while he's a sock.
Although, to be fair, he does have a point regarding Englands defence and how it compares to Brasils. Other than that Brasil's midfield and attack are stronger than Englands
COBRA007
20 Nov 2005, 06:41 PM
So are you a sock or just an ignorant troll?
If you honestly think that anything you said holds true then you are a sad excuse for a "knowledgable" poster.
you dont know what your talking about, so i couddnt give a ******** if you think "i have a point"
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 06:58 PM
I've been saying for a while he's a sock.
Although, to be fair, he does have a point regarding Englands defence and how it compares to Brasils. Other than that Brasil's midfield and attack are stronger than Englands
I agree, I like the English backline, aside from the keeper, over the Brazilian Backline. He is just some sock, I am convinced now.
That or he is really stupid and deserving of a special place on a certain thread around here.
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 07:00 PM
you dont know what your talking about, so i couddnt give a ******** if you think "i have a point"
Of course you care or you wouldn't have responded to me. Did the wittle bitty troll get upset cause I said he isn't smart enough?
Of course if you aren't a troll or sock, do give a detailed post describing how the 2 time defending champs aren't as good man for man as England. I should like to read that.
Prawn Sandwich
20 Nov 2005, 07:09 PM
I agree, I like the English backline, aside from the keeper, over the Brazilian Backline. He is just some sock, I am convinced now.
That or he is really stupid and deserving of a special place on a certain thread around here.
If he wasn't such an obvious sock then he'd be close to having his own thread dedicated to his gibberish (which normally only goes as far as "STFU, you don't know what you're talking about").
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 07:09 PM
If he wasn't such an obvious sock then he'd be close to having his own thread dedicated to his gibberish (which normally only goes as far as "STFU, you don't know what you're talking about").
That isn't a bad idea, a STFU thread for specific posters.....
COBRA007
20 Nov 2005, 07:27 PM
Of course you care or you wouldn't have responded to me. Did the wittle bitty troll get upset cause I said he isn't smart enough?
Of course if you aren't a troll or sock, do give a detailed post describing how the 2 time defending champs aren't as good man for man as England. I should like to read that.
^^please have the intelligence to read sentences correctly,
why is better Dida then robinson other then playing for a bigger club and better defense infont of him? you cant answer this, just jumping on the bandwagan again
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 07:31 PM
^^please have the intelligence to read sentences correctly,
why is better Dida then robinson other then playing for a bigger club and better defense infont of him? you cant answer this, just jumping on the bandwagan again
So is that going to be your arguement? That I am jumping on the bandwagon? You are going to have to do better then that sock. Do detail how those players are better. I am always curious to hear how a team that has won the past 2 WC's, has players playing all over the World for the best clubs, isn't as good as a team that quite frankly struggled to make it into the WCF in Germany.
I like England. I think they are at least in the top 4 or 5 teams to win the Cup. But I have not seen anything from anyone to think that they should be favored over Brazil.
But since you are a sock and not smart enough to comprehend that none of your posts will be taken seriously, I will just continue to amuse myself with your grade school posts.
COBRA007
20 Nov 2005, 07:46 PM
So is that going to be your arguement? That I am jumping on the bandwagon? You are going to have to do better then that sock. Do detail how those players are better. I am always curious to hear how a team that has won the past 2 WC's, has players playing all over the World for the best clubs, isn't as good as a team that quite frankly struggled to make it into the WCF in Germany.
I like England. I think they are at least in the top 4 or 5 teams to win the Cup. But I have not seen anything from anyone to think that they should be favored over Brazil.
But since you are a sock and not smart enough to comprehend that none of your posts will be taken seriously, I will just continue to amuse myself with your grade school posts.
England is better then brazil man for man in defense and players like gerrard , rooney, beckham, Lampard, J Cole have enough ability to hold there own against the Brazilian options.(they also play key roles for some of the worlds top clubs) stop twisting words and read the sentences correctly
Scarecrow
20 Nov 2005, 08:32 PM
England is better then brazil man for man in defense and players like gerrard , rooney, beckham, Lampard, J Cole have enough ability to hold there own against the Brazilian options.(they also play key roles for some of the worlds top clubs) stop twisting words and read the sentences correctly
What words did I twist?
You said England was unmatched man for man compared to any team in the world and I called you on it. Prove to me that what you say is true. You can't but I still will laugh at you while you try.
Mosco
20 Nov 2005, 09:13 PM
I would like to see England go up against Croatia that would be a game to drool over!
both same height.
FMF_LFP
21 Nov 2005, 12:58 AM
Spain with out a doubt.......
They will not surprise me at alll ...... NOTHING NEWW
Colm
21 Nov 2005, 05:14 AM
I agree, I like the English backline, aside from the keeper, over the Brazilian Backline. He is just some sock, I am convinced now.
That or he is really stupid and deserving of a special place on a certain thread around here.We've got Paul Robinson now, nothing to worry about there :cool:
t.z0n3
21 Nov 2005, 09:27 AM
Spain with out a doubt.......
They will not surprise me at alll ...... NOTHING NEWW
I think this was in all of our minds when we read the title to the thread. :D
I have to agree. Spain will flop.
COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 12:13 PM
What words did I twist?
You said England was unmatched man for man compared to any team in the world and I called you on it. Prove to me that what you say is true. You can't but I still will laugh at you while you try.
Sherlock, find the post which says "england man for man are unmatched compared to any team in the world", have some inteligience next time, you make yourself look stupid
Scarecrow
21 Nov 2005, 12:19 PM
Sherlock, find the post which says "england man for man are unmatched compared to any team in the world", have some inteligience next time, you make yourself look stupid
You cannot possibly be as dumb as you are making yourself out to be here. I thought for sure you had given up, but since you continue to show your ass here and be ignorant of even your own posts I suggest that you look at post 71 in this thread to see where you said:
if england "are not good enough" who has a better team man for man then england out of all the 32 teams. you will ignore this post cos you cant answer it.
So I responded Brazil. You asked who has a better team man for man. There you go. Now go scurry back into your little hole in the wall and leave the convesation to the adults. Oh and STFU Loser!
COBRA007
21 Nov 2005, 12:29 PM
You cannot possibly be as dumb as you are making yourself out to be here. I thought for sure you had given up, but since you continue to show your ass here and be ignorant of even your own posts I suggest that you look at post 71 in this thread to see where you said:
So I responded Brazil. You asked who has a better team man for man. There you go. Now go scurry back into your little hole in the wall and leave the convesation to the adults. Oh and STFU Loser!
so where does it say "england are unmatched man for man in world football" :rolleyes: it was a question asking whos better then england man for man after some geezer said england dont have the quality, obviously you dont have the intelligence to read properly, so i let you off