PDA

View Full Version : Battrick thread, Part III


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20

John_Harkes_6
14 Oct 2005, 11:02 AM
Is it time for a battrick forum of its own -- separate from Hattrick???

Better luck with it being a sub-forum of Hattrick not its own forum per se.

kopiteinkc
14 Oct 2005, 11:06 AM
Better luck with it being a sub-forum of Hattrick not its own forum per se.

Good idea.

kopiteinkc
14 Oct 2005, 11:10 AM
Request made:

http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?t=255830

Post your thoughts and we will get this done.

Bluto11
14 Oct 2005, 11:35 AM
an hour is up and still no commentary.

this is BS.

johno
14 Oct 2005, 11:52 AM
its damn nonsense... what, so because we play cricket in a third world region we can't start on time?!?!? damned nonsense.

Bluto11
14 Oct 2005, 12:14 PM
its damn nonsense... what, so because we play cricket in a third world region we can't start on time?!?!? damned nonsense.
seriously

John_Harkes_6
14 Oct 2005, 12:25 PM
If you choose Australia you could just miss the last half of your games b/c they run until 1 or 2AM

John_Harkes_6
14 Oct 2005, 01:05 PM
How many Psychologists does everyone have?

Kevin in Louisiana
14 Oct 2005, 01:09 PM
At this point I'm a little perturbed that my WI cup match still isn't shown on the schedule.

Dan Loney
14 Oct 2005, 01:11 PM
an hour is up and still no commentary.

this is BS.I think this particular game is a little more popular than its creators thought it would be. I'm thinking of going totally NASL and buying as many expensive players as I can, trashing the youth system and training, and winning now because who knows if there will be a tomorrow?

John_Harkes_6
14 Oct 2005, 01:13 PM
I think this particular game is a little more popular than its creators thought it would be. I'm thinking of going totally NASL and buying as many expensive players as I can, trashing the youth system and training, and winning now because who knows if there will be a tomorrow?

They need to stop expanding and limit things until they get a few seasons under their belt to get things running smoothly.

Bluto11
14 Oct 2005, 01:19 PM
If you choose Australia you could just miss the last half of your games b/c they run until 1 or 2AM
the waiting list was pretty long for Australia, so i went with the Windies

Bluto11
14 Oct 2005, 02:21 PM
4 hours, no commentary.

johno
14 Oct 2005, 02:35 PM
this is beyond silly, the game might as well have been cancelled.

Bluto11
14 Oct 2005, 03:06 PM
yup. supposedly they are "working" on it. I bet the fact that the WI got no supporter updates and no cup draw has something to do with it.


its not like they have 5 days to fix it or anything like that. If this happened in England or Australia they sledging boards would be going crazy.

Dan Loney
14 Oct 2005, 04:04 PM
yup. supposedly they are "working" on it. I bet the fact that the WI got no supporter updates and no cup draw has something to do with it.


its not like they have 5 days to fix it or anything like that. If this happened in England or Australia they sledging boards would be going crazy.It's because we're black.

quentinc
14 Oct 2005, 06:06 PM
this is BS.
Very true statement. This is BigSoccer;)

Absolutely OWNED my opponent. Went for 345 (with one batsman getting 138), and held them to about 175 all out.

Craig P
15 Oct 2005, 01:16 AM
An over where the bowler does not concede any runs.Note that byes are not counted as conceded by the bowler, so a maiden does not necessarily have no runs conceded at all.

Craig P
15 Oct 2005, 01:20 AM
I think the Windies got hung up earlier in the week and Allan just hasn't had enough time to fix the problem.

I'm not sure how much of the issue is expansion. The biggest problem, in my mind, is that the site already seems to have outgrown Allan's ability to fix problems by himself. We have way too many issues that take a week plus to fix, and at the rate we're going there's going to be serious catching up to do in the Windies if they don't fix everything ASAP.

johno
15 Oct 2005, 05:54 AM
Note that byes are not counted as conceded by the bowler, so a maiden does not necessarily have no runs conceded at all.

wrong... a maiden is an over in which no rusn have been conceded... period.