View Full Version : Fulham new shirts?
Fulham South
25 Jul 2005, 12:12 PM
The new Away kit is outstanding. I like both new kits. Of course, to me anything beats the baby blues from last year.
Mr. Bee
26 Jul 2005, 02:40 PM
Very happy with the away kit
tonhtubra
01 Aug 2005, 04:57 PM
Personally, i think the other two panels on left sleeve should have been made black. The all black sleeve was one of the most distintive kits around, and i think the new ones look very run of the mill. I messed around with a pic to show what i mean, but can't figure out how to post it on here. If somebody could PM me and inform me i will post it.
Also, i can't find any pics of these red away kits you are talking about. Could somebody point me in the right direction. Or, are the red kits mentioned the same as the shirts being worn by the coaches and staff at the All-Star game. Wouldn't that just be a training jersey?
tonhtubra
01 Aug 2005, 09:08 PM
This is what i am thinking would have been more distinctive and make people recognize immediately it is Fulham.
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/2579/fulhamhomeedited8sp.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
kevbrunton
05 Aug 2005, 10:17 AM
Another question about the shirts (sorta) - why were so many players wearing different numbers at the All Star game?
McBride was wearing 9 instead of 8. Bocanegra wasn't wearing 4 (wasn't he 4 last year)? It seemed like there were a few others wearing different numbers.
Is it just because they haven't set the numbers for the season yet? I noticed that the FFC website still has all the jersey's listed at TBD.
Mr. Bee
05 Aug 2005, 10:40 AM
Another question about the shirts (sorta) - why were so many players wearing different numbers at the All Star game?
McBride was wearing 9 instead of 8. Bocanegra wasn't wearing 4 (wasn't he 4 last year)? It seemed like there were a few others wearing different numbers.
Is it just because they haven't set the numbers for the season yet? I noticed that the FFC website still has all the jersey's listed at TBD.
They never have the same numbers in preseason, notice they didnt have names (Boca was 3 last year, I think he was 6 at the MLS game, Jensen was 3).
I think McBride will take the 9 though as Coley's gone.
ChicagoTom
05 Aug 2005, 10:52 AM
Is it just because they haven't set the numbers for the season yet? I noticed that the FFC website still has all the jersey's listed at TBD.
This is the exact reason why. The numbers do not have to be set until the end of the month. Although most clubs have theirs all set, Fulham for some reason still has not announced these yet.
kevbrunton
05 Aug 2005, 01:19 PM
This is the exact reason why. The numbers do not have to be set until the end of the month. Although most clubs have theirs all set, Fulham for some reason still has not announced these yet.
Coleman's probably waiting to find out who is actually on the team - i.e., Malbranque & Boa Morte.
Another thought that I had was to wonder if he would "assign" the numbers based upon his "starting" 11 - like Ajax does and like England does for their Nats games. The old traditional numbering like:
------ 1 -----
- 2 - 3 - 4 - 5
------ 6 -----
7 ---------- 8
----- 10 -----
-- 9 ---- 11 -
Which would actually mean McBride would be 9 if he is going to be considered a starter. But then some of the established guys like Malbranque & Boa Morte would be giving up the numbers they've been using.
Probably not - but interesting speculation.
Mr. Bee
05 Aug 2005, 01:45 PM
Coleman's probably waiting to find out who is actually on the team - i.e., Malbranque & Boa Morte.
Another thought that I had was to wonder if he would "assign" the numbers based upon his "starting" 11 - like Ajax does and like England does for their Nats games. The old traditional numbering like:
------ 1 -----
- 2 - 3 - 4 - 5
------ 6 -----
7 ---------- 8
----- 10 -----
-- 9 ---- 11 -
Which would actually mean McBride would be 9 if he is going to be considered a starter. But then some of the established guys like Malbranque & Boa Morte would be giving up the numbers they've been using.
Probably not - but interesting speculation.
Malbranque is staying now... but the way you've shown it is the way that they have pretty much been playing this summer... with a few exceptions.
kevbrunton
05 Aug 2005, 02:19 PM
Personally, i think the other two panels on left sleeve should have been made black. The all black sleeve was one of the most distintive kits around, and i think the new ones look very run of the mill. I messed around with a pic to show what i mean, but can't figure out how to post it on here. If somebody could PM me and inform me i will post it.
Also, i can't find any pics of these red away kits you are talking about. Could somebody point me in the right direction. Or, are the red kits mentioned the same as the shirts being worn by the coaches and staff at the All-Star game. Wouldn't that just be a training jersey?
Look here - Away Kit Unveiled (http://www.fulhamfc.com/news/football_news_latest_6387.html)
tonhtubra
06 Aug 2005, 12:34 PM
Look here - Away Kit Unveiled (http://www.fulhamfc.com/news/football_news_latest_6387.html)
Thanks alot, I was thinking nobody was ever going to help me. Pretty decent looking away.
PoshSpur
11 Aug 2005, 01:37 AM
Our (Spurs) new home kit looks like the Fulham home kit. So your new kit will probably look like our old lilywhite lovely home kit.
Commentators are going to get confused. :confused: