PDA

View Full Version : USA v. England: Who will win?


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

Yobbogadaba
28 May 2005, 07:49 PM
Landon Donovan, Kasey Keller, Brian McBride - plus all the other starting players who all have multiple caps... USA is far closer to fullstrength than England.

Which just goes to show how much stronger England are, and how the USA has no chance of winning anything in the next 30 years.


Landon Donovan-Latest spell with Bayer lasted 3 months, flopp.
Kasey Keller-An on goalie, wouldnt have been the first choice in for example Sweden or Denmark,Norway...........
Brian McBride-Is he still alive? My god, he is worthless

Cannon
28 May 2005, 08:21 PM
England has no chance now.

Read this. (http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=334481&cc=5739)

;)

How did they overcome this loss? ;) :D

Jasonisimo
29 May 2005, 12:07 AM
England 2-1 US.
US scores on a penalty in the second half. England scores one off a set piece,Ooo! Close!

Wisemensay
29 May 2005, 02:59 AM
USA 5 England 0

The Emperor has no clothes.


HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a fool! Football knowledge - zero.

s3rg10
29 May 2005, 02:44 PM
The game put things into perspective this is how things are like:

U.S.A worse than England B-team with home side advantage

U.S.A for a very short while better than 2002 Portugal (who had a crap coach and Figo was injured along with none of the players playing properly)

while England B-team is as good (the 2-1 win) as mexico with a home side advantage lets see what mexico are like away

but England worse than new Portugal (2004 with preety much all "the golden generation" gone)

so overall if England went out with their A-team the scoreline would be a lot bigger

Cannon
29 May 2005, 03:05 PM
The game put things into perspective this is how things are like:

U.S.A worse than England B-team with home side advantage

U.S.A for a very short while better than 2002 Portugal (who had a crap coach and Figo was injured along with none of the players playing properly)

while England B-team is as good (the 2-1 win) as mexico with a home side advantage lets see what mexico are like away

but England worse than new Portugal (2004 with preety much all "the golden generation" gone)

so overall if England went out with their A-team the scoreline would be a lot bigger

You're a very smart guy. Seriously. So if England's A squad played our B squad they would do better than your B/C squad did. Wow, such stunning insight.

Using your idiotic logic, Burnley are the best team in Europe. They knocked Liverpool out of the FA Cup. Liverpool won the CL so thus Burnley are better than the likes of Barca, B.Munich, Chelsea, Arsenal, etc.

:rolleyes:

People who think friendlies predict outcomes of real matches should only use saftey scissors.

Tony Dellbird
31 May 2005, 05:18 PM
Well come on let's be fair! England had a full strength side on, and USA were missing many of their best players!

I mean c'mon we've got to keep feeding these Sams Army tossers with ******** like they're used to and believe they're actually good! I tell you, this site would be boring if it didn't have the USA supporters!