ESPN Not Showing CL Semi-final for First Time

[MiamiAce]

Disappointing.

ESPN will not show the PSV vs AC Milan Champions League semi-final Tuesday April 26. First time ESPN will not a semi-final match. The reason for their decisions is unbeknoweth to us. Perhaps it has to do with the fact that DeMarcus Beasley, an American, is in the semi-final (first ever American? not sure), and this could boost some interest in our country for soccer? We all know ESPN execs wouldn't want that now.

[Beckham7]

I thought they were going to show both, now they're only showing the chelsea-liverpool match. Espn has gone to a new low, first delaying the game on saturday night now this. They are on a roll..

[speekeasy8]

I don't think that ESPN has a choice. I believe that a new channel, Setanta Sports USA, has exclusive English-language rights to the game.

[tab5g]

ESPN2 is showing both legs of the Chelsea/Liverpool semi, and only the second leg of the PSV/Milan semi. I don't know why.

3 out of 4 isn't bad, but 4 out of 4 would have been ideal.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/tv/listing?date=20050504&cc=5901
Wednesday, May 4, 2005
ESPN2
2:30 pm EST (LIVE)
UEFA Champions League
PSV vs. AC Milan
Philips Stadion Eindhoven, Netherlands

[Beckham7]

Ya, im sure they aren't showing anything important at 1130 am tomorrow.

[TarheelJTK]

I'm pretty sure they are showing more world series of poker. I like poker as much as the next guy, but I'd much rather watch the CL especially with damarcus in there. I guess ESPN would rather have people watch poker for the 5000th time than show us both semifinals.

[Khansingh]

Actually, it's even better. They have to show the second re-air of Cold Pizza. Why anyone would want to watch one episode of Cold Pizza since they got rid of Kitt and Thea is beyond my comprehension.

[JasonC]

They got rid of Kit?

Her legs were pretty much the only reason I ever tuned in.

[rangers00]

Disappointing.

ESPN will not show the PSV vs AC Milan Champions League semi-final Tuesday April 26. First time ESPN will not a semi-final match. The reason for their decisions is unbeknoweth to us. Perhaps it has to do with the fact that DeMarcus Beasley, an American, is in the semi-final (first ever American? not sure), and this could boost some interest in our country for soccer? We all know ESPN execs wouldn't want that now.

This dope is amazing. You know full well that ESPN sold the game to Setanta Sports USA, to be debuted tomorrow morning at 06:00. This channel is going to have Milan x PSV as their feature match for the launch. Yet you still whine about ESPN...

You are interested in watching the game. Your agenda are either one of the two, or both:

1) whine at ESPN
2) only want to watch the game for free (after paying the cable bills)

If you really want to watch the game, who's stopping you from subbing it from DirecTV?

[pc4th]

heard of a thing call 'bittorrent'?

around 7-8 hours to download a full game depend on your speed.

Maxxed Forum ROCKS!!!!!

[rangers00]

heard of a thing call 'bittorrent'?

around 7-8 hours to download a full game depend on your speed.

Maxxed Forum ROCKS!!!!!

The few whiners here have been arguing against bittorrents for months, for no reason other than it would weaken their argument against ESPN2.

- BT is too slow
- BT is not live
- BT has lousy picture quality
- can't watch a game on the monitor
- file is too big
- if BT works how can we bash ESPN2?

[DAGSports]

Setanta owned the rights to the game.

I am actually surprised ESPN 2 is showing Chelsea-Liverpool. You'd think Setanta would pay a king's ransom for that game because of the guaranteed pub sales, even if nobody is rushing to purchase their new channel.

We'll see whether or not Setanta gets all the games with English teams next season.

[BocaFan]

ESPN2 is showing both legs of the Chelsea/Liverpool semi, and only the second leg of the PSV/Milan semi. I don't know why.

3 out of 4 isn't bad, but 4 out of 4 would have been ideal.



I'm sure that the second-leg will also be shown on Setanta Sports USA (since espn is Setanta's biyyyaatch). In other words, its only 2 out of 4.

It's pretty silly that a soccer channel (Set. Sports USA) launches right at the end of the European soccer season. They expect us to pay $12/month all thru the dry summer months just so we can get 1 or 2 games at the tail-end of this season? Are they dreaming? I mean, what are they gonna be showing b/w the PSV - Milan game on May 4th until the first-matchday of 2005/06 Champions League when they MIGHT(!) buy the 5th and/or 6th choice CL match?

[monster]

I'm sure that the second-leg will also be shown on Setanta Sports USA (since espn is Setanta's biyyyaatch). In other words, its only 2 out of 4.

Uh, don't be so sure.

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tvlistings/schedule?date=20050504&network=02

UEFA Champions League
PSV vs. AC Milan
Philips Stadion Eindhoven, Netherlands
Semifinal #2 2:30 pm to
4:45 pm

[IASocFan]

GREAT! Just in time for me to set my vcr to record it. NOT!!! :eek: :( :

[monster]

GREAT! Just in time for me to set my vcr to record it. NOT!!! :eek: :( :
That's the second game.

[bostonsoccermdl]

I know this is straying off topic, but all roads for the soccer fan point to getting Direct TV. The writing is on the wall...

Just this week (or I realized this week), we now have GolTV and Setanta (a/o today).. GolTV is free, and Setanta has a monthly fee I believe ($12? I am going to call this morning for info)..

This is in addition to an already improving FSC..

Direct TV really isnt that much $$$, and it in my opinion is a small price to pay with all the coverage you get..

******** ESPN, but what do you expect from them, expect nothing or the worst and you wont be dissapointed. JUst focus on what you can get access too..

[monster]

I know this is straying off topic, but all roads for this particular soccer fan point to getting Direct TV. The writing is on the wall...

Just this week (or I realized this week), we now have GolTV and Setanta (a/o today).. GolTV is free, and Setanta has a monthly fee I believe ($12? I am going to call this morning for info)..

This is in addition to an already improving FSC..

Direct TV really isnt that much $$$, and it in my opinion is a small price to pay with all the coverage you get..

******** ESPN, but what do you expect from them, expect nothing or the worst and you wont be dissapointed. JUst focus on what you can get access too..

Fixed your post. There is no one-size fits all. You're not defined as a soccer fan by how many games you can receive on television.

[bostonsoccermdl]

Fixed your post. There is no one-size fits all. You're not defined as a soccer fan by how many games you can receive on television.

Point taken. I didnt mean it that way. I just see so much frustuation all over re: ESPN, it is important people know they have options.

[Cannon]

I thought about getting Directv after my neighbor finally cut down his monster tree that made it impossible for me to see the neccessary patch of sky. However, I stuck with Comcast. I get FSC and Goltv for $5 and already had FSE as part of the spanish tier for $10. I love the C.Libertadores and some of the other programs you can't get on Goltv or FSC. The spanish tier also has TVEI from Spain (although Comcast and the TV Guide think it is telemundo international so you've got to find the football yourself) which has spanish B teams and Spain national team games plus a few other football matches of various sorts throughout the year. The spanish tier also has channels from Chile and Colombia that show their domestic leagues. It also has the spanish version of Goltv which helped recently when the english one went spanish since the spanish one went to english.

I'm doubtful about spending $12 for the new channel but I am hoping that Comcast adds it so I at least have the choice.