PDA

View Full Version : Disney getting out of baseball and hockey


Red Card
26 Sep 2002, 10:58 PM
Cannot figure out Disney. Espn pushes baseball and hockey to the hilt, yet Disney wants to get out of ownership in those sports. Seems contradictory to me.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=577&ncid=577&e=2&u=/nm/20020927/sp_nm/leisure_disney_teams_dc

FootyMundo
26 Sep 2002, 11:23 PM
Disney is a really big company. No doubt some of their divisions and investments do better than others. The analysis goes deeper than any of us could care to know is my guess and relates to all sorts of internal dealings within their company.

Jeff
27 Sep 2002, 12:43 AM
Pretty simple:

Disney's tired of losing lots of money on the Ducks and Angels, this season's surprise baseball success notwithstanding. The TV network's doing a lot better than those two separate franchises.

sydtheeagle
27 Sep 2002, 12:47 AM
Does this mean baseball won't be a Mickey Mouse sport any more?

BenReilly
27 Sep 2002, 12:55 AM
Originally posted by Red Card
Cannot figure out Disney. Espn pushes baseball and hockey to the hilt, yet Disney wants to get out of ownership in those sports. Seems contradictory to me.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=577&ncid=577&e=2&u=/nm/20020927/sp_nm/leisure_disney_teams_dc

You need to understand that they don't "push baseball" Just because you don't like it doesn't mean millions of others aren't watching.

They make a fortune on their cable properties. People want to watch these programs (and events) so much that they can charge the cable companies a fortune, more than double CNN or any network. They don't make money paying 8 figure salaries to baseball players. No contradiction. A better question is why in the world they would want to actually own any teams. Furthermore, they have garbage teams (in terms of brand value).

snowfx2
27 Sep 2002, 01:14 PM
This is no surprise, they've wanted to get out of owning pro sports for a couple of years now. I'm happy, Disney has shown that they don't know how to run jack squat when it comes to owning pro sports. The Ducks sold out every game the 1st few seasons and sold the most merchandise of any team in the NHL, and now are last in attendance. Disney figures the product will sell themselves, such as Edison Field, the Arrowhead Pond, and Paul Kariya.

But they have shown improvements this past year, with the great Angels success and the Ducks signing and trading for decent players.

But they're still better than Donald Sterling.

jmeissen0
30 Sep 2002, 02:20 AM
most owners that make good money off their teams, make the most when they sell their team

they might lose money from operating it, but when the sell it, they will make a nice profit

-jim

Ghost
30 Sep 2002, 10:19 AM
IF they do get out of baseball, cant he California Angels go back to being the California Angels, instead of this Anaheim crap?

wu-tang beez
30 Sep 2002, 10:30 AM
We should all be very happy. Owners that aren't commited to winning and are instead focused on turning a profit, are in the wrong line of business. Sports franchises have a very slim margin of profit and require a heavy handed effort to make them work.

whirlwind
30 Sep 2002, 10:58 AM
Originally posted by Ghost
IF they do get out of baseball, cant he California Angels go back to being the California Angels, instead of this Anaheim crap?

And will the Mighty Ducks get a real name?

Or will Emilio Estevez become their new coach?

snowfx2
30 Sep 2002, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by Ghost
IF they do get out of baseball, cant he California Angels go back to being the California Angels, instead of this Anaheim crap?

What's wrong with Anaheim? I like it better as there are 4 other teams in California. Also, Anaheim is their home city, the largest city in Orange County, and one of the most recognizable cities in this country thanks to Disneyland.

Khansingh
06 Oct 2002, 12:57 AM
Well they should really move to Chavez Ravine and change their name to the Los Angeles Angels. Since somebody has to get their head and their ass wired together and move the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, where they belong. Damn it.

GoHawks4
06 Oct 2002, 01:15 AM
I wouldn't say that ESPN is really pushing hockey.

Achtung
06 Oct 2002, 01:44 AM
Originally posted by Khansingh
Well they should really move to Chavez Ravine and change their name to the Los Angeles Angels. Since somebody has to get their head and their ass wired together and move the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, where they belong. Damn it.

Ok, grandpa. ;)

Red Card
06 Oct 2002, 09:29 AM
Originally posted by Khansingh
Well they should really move to Chavez Ravine and change their name to the Los Angeles Angels. Since somebody has to get their head and their ass wired together and move the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, where they belong. Damn it.

If every American cricket team went back to their original city and kept their current nickname, it would be very interesting. Like the Baltimore Yankees, Boston Braves, St Louis Orioles, ...

wu-tang beez
06 Oct 2002, 03:52 PM
Philthydelphia A's, Washington Senators...

SABuffalo786
06 Oct 2002, 04:57 PM
Originally posted by Achtung


Ok, grandpa. ;)

I had to walk 15 miles, uphill, in a blizzard, just to get to that damn stadium. Well, I guess it all began back in Austria, where they called lunchboxes Sweedish suitcases. Anyhow, I had to chase that rascly Kaiser all over the countryside, and, and, *snore*............................