PDA

View Full Version : Stadiums Rumors...


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7

Deuce
30 Nov 2004, 12:26 PM
1) Local desire/desperation vrs Regional Benifit. A Soccer Specific Stadium is beneficial to all involved and is in the best interest of the Region as well as the local area.


2) Cost of land: Because of proximity to like high rise office space nearby land is expensive and may be more valuable tax wise (and best use) in other uses. Is a $5 million to $10 Million land premium going to pay off for the teams useage and finacial return?Land that is dis-used industrial and in need of re-development is generally cheaper than "green-field" areas. The infrastructure is already in place.
The city has many ways to gain the land cheaper than an individual can aquire the same land. (Just think back to how Larry H. Miller aquired the land for the Delta Center with the help of the city) The City will re-zone, condemn, or trade (Remember the Main Street Affair) To aquire the land that it wants.


3) 10 acre city blocks may be big by Eastern and European standards but still small for a Stadium. The mimimum footprint for a stadium is 4 acres. The security/surveilance zone arround the structure will eat up 2 to 4 acres. Staff, Player, bus, Media and VIP parking will take the rest, leaving little space for the required greenspace landscaping. I am unsure of the requirements per area within the stadium zone but I am reasonable sure that a 10 acre lot can easily become a 20 acre lot by removing the thru street so it is not difficult to envision a stadium downtown.


4) Where will you find 5000 parking places (the 4:1 ratio for "suburban") or 2000 (the 10 to 1 ratio for "Urban"areas with parking available)? [NOTE: This kind of standard was required of all sites when the Blitzz looked for stadium land. Now if Rockey has ideas of changing the rules he has an opponent.]The Parking is already available in and around the dwntown area, either walk or TRAX to the stadium from a parking lot. Delta Center, both downtown Malls, The Gateway and about 30 downtown private and public lots would be plenty for a stadium that will seat approximately 1/2 - 3/4 of the Delta Center. Plus any parking built with the stadium. (If I am not mistaken this will be a 10-15 thousand seat stadium.)


5) Practice areas must be at a separate place! This costs money and time. If a $2 million payroll of players and staff are spending 2 hours a day in travel and setup/takedown time that could be spent in useful activities, it is a poor value return for the team.The Jazz have a much larger player and organizational payroll and they don't practice at the Delta Center. They practice at the Zion's Bank Facility about 6 miles away. I am reasonably certain that they would not be doing this if it were a waste of money.


6) Hiz Pub-Crawlness "vision" for Downtown is for more "lively" bars and such. Maybe he considers a stadium a really big "Party House". Absolutely the wrong idea for Utah family values and totally missing the demographics of the people who attend pro soccer in Utah. I have been to the games and looked at who was there and seen the non-profit beer sales at Freezz games.I feel that gearing your sales pitch to a specific demographic while ignoring the others is financial suicide.
What about visiting fans? Soccer is a sport that has fans that traditionally travel to 'away' games. They come from very diverse backgrounds so alienating or ignoring there needs will only hurt the team and the area, as well as businesses in and around the stadium. Not to mention the Hotel industry.

I agree that the demographics are strongly geared toward a 'family' sport, however there are countless area attractions that cater to this function.
I also realize that this is not the only demographic for the area. Having an area for other demographic groups is good common sense and financially sound business planning.

The family atmosphere can be maintained while co-existing with the rest of the demographic groups. Other cities have been pulling it off for decades... I am sure we can do it here!



7) If there is adequete land (20 to 100 acres) available cheep Downtown, why hasn't Boyer or Wall-Mart grabbed it? Maybe it is low valued for a reason, and that turns away developers.I think this is redundent with the third point but I do think that if the city had been properly motivated by Wal-Mart or a different group that wanted to build in downtown that the plans would have been drawn up.
I believe that the city would NOT subsidize a Wal-Mart but would help subsidize a stadium so this point is mute.


8) TRAX would benifit more from a suburban site with lots of parking around the stadium availabe for the worker/student/shopper who lives off the line and will take the train if there is parking close to home and at the Station. The same for all Sports Fans who want to get to a game without the nearby parking problems. FUTURE AD: "Park at ReAL Stadium for Ute Football or Jazz games and ride TRAX".Erm... this could go both ways... The TRAX does service the downtown area so having the stadium downtown would be beneficial to TRAX users as well.


9) Big fireworks shows won't go at a crowded Downtown site.Fireworks are used downtown every 4th & 24th of July at Franklin-Covey Field and Liberty Park so this point does not make sense. Unless you don't consider these areas downtown.


10) The best interests of the team should be utmost! Comprimising principle and sound stadium siteing for a dubius value "downtownism" is not tin the best interest of ReAL Salt Lake!I am more than reasonably sure that sound stadium siting will be employed wherever the stadium is homed. Of course It will benefit Real Salt Lake and the area in which it is homed or it will be built somewhere else.

sokol
30 Nov 2004, 02:11 PM
Something else to keep in mind is that this won't be exclusively a soccer stadium. I think no doubt a stadium like this would have HS sports, concerts, extreme sports shows and a whole bunch of other things. Right now nobody puts on big outdoor concerts unless they think it's someone big enough for Rice-Eccles. A moderately sized downtown outdoor stadium could be a huge draw. I know there was talk of making it an ice rink in the winter, something which is very common in parts of Europe that get snow. Downtown could use more recreational facilities. Although I'm sure they've made no comment, the church would likely be very supportive of a downtown stadium because it would bring family-oriented entertainment near temple square.

To make full use of the facility, it is best off downtown. As a soccer stadium alone, it may actually be better off in Murray but that is debateable. But this thing won't be too economically viable as a soccer stadium alone, at least initially. None of the SSS's are. A soccer stadium has a huge advantage over a baseball stadium because it accomodates many uses. That has probably been a big part of the failure for Franklin Covey. If they only play 20 games a year, it's hard to justify the land downtown for them. But if they have something going on almost every weekend, it has real value. They need to push for downtown because it gives the facility as a whole a better chance to be very profitable. Murray would be great for just the soccer stadium, and if they get cheap land it makes it possible to put a stadium there even if it's just for soccer. But Murray's overall potential just isn't as high as downtown's.

StarsOnSunday
30 Nov 2004, 09:20 PM
I'm all for a downtown stadium. I love the idea of jumping on the train at Fort Union and singing Loyalist fight songs all the way to the courthouse station. We could adopt our own unofficial headquarters at some dive near the stadium; a place where we could gather before and after the matches to eat and sing praises to our heros. Who's with me?

OldFanatic
01 Dec 2004, 01:19 AM
You guys havent even played a game yet and you already have a stadium. Congratulations.
Wait, am I missing something? They don't have a stadium yet. All they have are stadium rumors. All teams have had those, including Kansas City and New England.

swedcrip34
01 Dec 2004, 02:41 AM
Wait, am I missing something? They don't have a stadium yet. All they have are stadium rumors. All teams have had those, including Kansas City and New England.

I don't think either has rumors of cities competing to build stadiums or an owner willing to pay for one.

Fuegofan
01 Dec 2004, 10:41 AM
Wait, am I missing something? They don't have a stadium yet. All they have are stadium rumors. All teams have had those, including Kansas City and New England.

Yes, but you have a) an owner committed to building one and b) a GM who did a lot of the work in getting the ball rolling for the one whose ceremonial groundbreaking was yesterday.

Rockey J Squirrel
01 Dec 2004, 12:26 PM
The more multi-use a stadium is, the more numerous disfuntional comprimises become.
Minimimally disfuntional: High School Play-off soccer, Minor League soccer, Womens soccer, Lacrosse (Pro or local), fireworks shows, Band and Dance competitions and Rugby. Increased useage obiously drives the decision to use an artifical playing surface as does on field practice.
Medium disfuntional: Gridiron football in any form, its those $U*&^% lines. 300 pound lineman mess up pool table smooth soccer pitches! Motocross etc. block out two weeks of useage for 2 nights of run and require fake turf.
Hopelessly disfuntional: Baseball, Cricket, Track & field and Aussie or Gaelic football because of the size and shpe are wrong.
Concerts are not likely. AEG does not control SLC, United Concerts and Clear Channel do. They have exclusive contracts in place. Why go to a stadium when you already have USANA Ampitheater in West Valley?

Freddy Garcia Lives
01 Dec 2004, 02:30 PM
You go to a stadium if they can underbid the compition. As far as american football goes, state finals and semifinals are ok since they are usually after the end of the season, and are only a total of about 10 games over two weeks. It is fine in Columbus with this arangement.

Blitzz Boy
04 Dec 2004, 02:44 PM
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2481256

The price of those abandoned warehouses that haven't been used since the Truman Administration would go up if word got out that the Santiago Bernabeito was going to be located there?

Yes, that was a run-on sentence.

stucknutah
20 Dec 2004, 03:51 PM
Latest (so called) news...

It looks like RSL is giving up on the Courthouse location. Holding is not selling, so the team appears to be focusing on the Murray and Gateway locations. (Sorry for the lack of cite...my sources prefer to remain anonymous).

Regarding the article in the Trib on Sat (I'm not posting the link, it is easy enough to find) the RSL people were pleased that it was neutral and clarified what they already knew...if they want city support (read tax dollars) above and beyond what was done for the Delta Center, the taxpayers and the city counsel need to know what's in it for them.

What is still not know is whether the ownership has the wherewithall to take on 100% of the brick and mortar. Additionally, it does not appear that the State has made any promises re expanding and improving 45th South, without which, access to the Murray location would have to be by TRAX (mostly).

Any specific thoughts on the Gateway location?

SoccerPrime
21 Dec 2004, 07:58 AM
Still can't imagine that RSL owner Checketts will ever build in Murray. He seems to be a downtown guy.

jfranz
21 Dec 2004, 02:24 PM
I'm sad to hear that "The Courthouse" has been taken off the table. That spot whould have been so perfect for so many reasons. But if it can't be done, it can't be done.

However, I firmly believe that a downtown stadium is the route to take and I'll now throw my support fully behind the Gateway location. In addition to the downtown location, my reasons for now supporting the Gateway include:

-The Skybox. Early front-runner for "official" sports bar of RSL and Utah Soccer. My friends and I have watched a number of soccer events there, including the Champs League final for the last two years in a row. They are always very accomidating and soccer friendly, even showing the Champs League final in the "theatre" for us. With the stadium next door, this place could become an exceptional and nationally enviable "soccer bar."

-The Delta Center. With RSL and the Jazz so close together, SLC can create and market it's new "sports district" downtown.

-Transportation. Both Gateway and Murray have the advantage of light-rail. However, Gateway is accessably from BOTH Trax lines, without a transfer. So, people living East of downtown, or, come to think of it, working in RSL's Trolley Square office, can hop on a train to the stadium and not have to fuss with a Galivan Center siesta, waiting for a Southbound train.

-Transportation (part 2). Future westward Trax expansion on North Temple to the airport might place a stop even closer to the front gate of the stadium. And Commuter Rail from Ogden (currently being built!) stops in downton SLC, with a station on North Temple, right next to Gateway! (Certainly, RSL fans from Davis and Weber County have to love this particular detail.) Sure, sure, commuter rail riders could get to Murray after a transfer to light rail, but the convenience and advantages of Gateway in regards to public transportation, both present and futre, cannot be overstated. Just look at UTA's master plan for future development. The Gateway region is envisioned as the epicenter of it all.

-Transportation (part 3). Gateway has better freeway access for those who choose to drive. Both the 6th South exit and the 4th (?) North exit serve Gateway very well (versus the single exit for Murray; and didn't a recent article mention improvement being necessary to 45th south if the stadium was built there?). Existing parking structures, both around the Delta Center and within Gateway, means that RSL can spend more money on the stadium itself and doesn't have to pour concrete over more of SLC's diminishing open spaces.

-Stuff to do. Now, I'm sure that if the stadium get's built in Murray, bars and such will sprout up. But it's already there downtown. And lots of it.

-League first. Would be the first urban/downtown SSS in MLS. This would likely lead to unique architectural considerations and use of space. Could be a truely distinctive stadium. The suburban stadium designs (with the quite notable exception of the work of art being built in Bridgeview) all kind of look the same to me.

-Other Development. Didn't the LDS church recently announce that they were going to invest millions into a BYU expansion, housing and other projects surrounding the Gateway/Triad Center?!

-Urban Renweal. We would replace a wasted, toxic downtown plot with a beautiful jewel.

In fact, the more I think of it, and the more I think about the future growth of SLC, the Gateway is and always has been the most attractive spot. Build it, baby!

SoccerPrime
21 Dec 2004, 02:29 PM
Is this what the LDS church plans for the area?
http://tv.ksl.com/index.php?sid=51983&nid=5&pid=1
(PS there is a image/map of the area in the web page)

jfranz
21 Dec 2004, 02:42 PM
Is this what the LDS church plans for the area?
http://tv.ksl.com/index.php?sid=51983&nid=5&pid=1
(PS there is a image/map of the area in the web page)

Thanks for the find Prime. Unfortunately, the images only include renderings of the planned development on Main Street (ZCMI Center and Crossroads Mall). However, the article does discuss the specific development that I pointed out in my original post. It says:

"...the Church has begun planning for construction of new buildings that will accommodate an expanded Salt Lake Center of Brigham Young University (BYU), as well as a new campus for LDS Business College.

Facilities for both educational institutions will be built on Blocks 85 and 86 in downtown Salt Lake City. Block 85, situated between North Temple and South Temple streets and 200 West and 300 West, was the site of the medals plaza for the 2002 Olympic Winter Games. Block 86 is located immediately east of Block 85, placing this new education campus adjacent to the west side of the Church’s world headquarters complex which includes Temple Square."

These blocks are very close to Gateway and I've got to believe that an increasingly global religion would love to have the world's game as it's neighbor!

The article also mentions the advantages of proximity to the future "intermodal transportation hub." I also loved this little bit:

"We have felt for some time that South Temple can be one of the grand boulevards of our city. That cannot come to pass if it ends in two blocks of empty asphalt."

The vision of RSL's stadium becoming part of this massive downtown revival is just too attractive to allow it to slip south into the suburbs.

blitzzfan
21 Dec 2004, 06:36 PM
Is it any shock that Holding isn't selling?!

IIRC he got Orrin to sponsor legislation for the feds to do improvements on his land for the Olympics.

pshelton
23 Dec 2004, 05:35 PM
Latest (so called) news...

It looks like RSL is giving up on the Courthouse location. Holding is not selling, so the team appears to be focusing on the Murray and Gateway locations. (Sorry for the lack of cite...my sources prefer to remain anonymous).


Any specific thoughts on the Gateway location?

I like the Gateway area better than Murray. There are quite a few folks that come from the north of Salt Lake too. It would be easy to add to the existing Trax line there. The area near Gateway (to the west?) needs a lot of work anyway so building a stadium and parking area would be fine. There can be a lot of things to do in Salt Lake downtown besides pub crawling. There are quite a few restaurants in the area as well as shopping, planetarium etc. If they make this stadium more multifunctional (though hopefully no American football use), it will enhance its effectiveness

Rockey J Squirrel
23 Dec 2004, 07:54 PM
The Gateway District is everything South of North Temple, West of Third West to the Freeway (I-15) South to 8th South. The only place that isn't going businesses or renewed/reclycled office space are the 2 blocks directly West of the Gateway Plaza development plus the portions of the blocks adjacent to the West and North but East of the UP and Commuter Rail lines that curve around the area. The contruction of the Intermodal Transportation Hub is under way, going along the tracks from 2nd to 4th South.

To the West of the Gateway Plaza is a partially cleaned out Brownfield site. About half of the business have been removed and all but Main UP Rail line is gone (I don't know about the oil and creasote contamination. Gateway Plaza hauled out soil down 40 feet to a safe disposal site to get undeground parking) at most there might be 35 acres of land if you close 6th West and 50 North. The West side will need to be a secure fence to keep people from having a Final Train Moment. Second South will be the only direct access from the residential area/surface streets to the West but across the tracks. North Temple as currently configured is set up primarily for exit to 3rd and 4th West and modification will be needed for major access to the landscaped center island 5th West. North Temple has a overpass to get over the tracks between 4th and 6th West. Access from the Freeway will be about the same as getting to the Delta Center: Off-ramp to conjested Surface Street till you find parking, then walk.

Gateway Plaza has the amenities that are "supposed" to be there for pre and post game spending of time and money. However the 5 story apartments on the West side are a Barrier Wall to store/resturant access, you will have only limited through passages. The tenants in the apartments may not like a late night stadium just scross the street from them. When I lobbied The Boyer Company for a Soccer Stadium before the Blitzz even started they told me their potential tennants did not want a sports stadium there.

The Murrey site is also a Brownfield site. It can have the same Commuter Rail access as the Gateway area since the Rail Corridors are very near each other. Old maps even show an interconnect at Fireclay Ave. Murrey is a logical site for a Commuter Rail station, why not make it at the Stadium?

This info has been gleaned from Gateway Plaza, UTA, Salt Lake City, Boyer and Tetraserver web sites.

Freddy Garcia Lives
24 Dec 2004, 01:48 AM
though hopefully no American football use

You are going to need to be able to promote this as a site for football playoff games in November (Go Darts!) that is more appealing for smaller attendance. WE do it here in Columbus and it works out great. But it will go a long way with a city council or state legislator if you throw a little pigskin into the mix.

swedcrip34
24 Dec 2004, 03:55 AM
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2496769
note that by "favoring" murray, they're talking about the poll result showing about 1/3 would favor it, not that RSL is favoring it at this point.

nyrmetros
06 Jan 2005, 12:53 AM
Just one thing... when you get your stadium built, don't invite these guys....

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/football/ncaa/specials/bowls/2004/01/05/bc.fbc.utahfans.taser.ap/p1_utahfan_ap.jpg

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/football/ncaa/specials/bowls/2004/01/05/bc.fbc.utahfans.taser.ap/index.html?cnn=yes