kevbrunton
23 Sep 2002, 11:48 AM
I saw this article on mlsnet.
http://www.mlsnet.com/content/02/mls0919denial.html
It's is written by Alfred Kleinaitis, Manager of Referee Development at US Soccer. He is discussing the law on denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity and uses as an example, a foul committed by Mike Clark on Landon Donovan in the Columbus v. San Jose game. He concludes that Clark was guilty of DOGSO, but the article didn't state what actually happened in the game. So I checked the game report from mlsnet and Clark was cautioned in the 45th, but no ejection.
So it seems to me that this boils down to the USSF Director of Referee Development publicly saying that Gus St. Silva blew it.
Did anyone see the game? What did you think of the foul and lack of red? Any other comments?
http://www.mlsnet.com/content/02/mls0919denial.html
It's is written by Alfred Kleinaitis, Manager of Referee Development at US Soccer. He is discussing the law on denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity and uses as an example, a foul committed by Mike Clark on Landon Donovan in the Columbus v. San Jose game. He concludes that Clark was guilty of DOGSO, but the article didn't state what actually happened in the game. So I checked the game report from mlsnet and Clark was cautioned in the 45th, but no ejection.
So it seems to me that this boils down to the USSF Director of Referee Development publicly saying that Gus St. Silva blew it.
Did anyone see the game? What did you think of the foul and lack of red? Any other comments?