352klr
10 Sep 2004, 02:26 AM
Before you freak out and start whining about another 'right-wing thread', keep in mind I'm voting for the douchebag. But for those who disputed the claims that John Kerry was against individual weapons systems when he vetoed some defense appropriations bills, here's proof you're wrong.
John Kerry
U.S. Senate
JOHN KERRY ON THE DEFENSE BUDGET
“We are continuing a defense buildup that is consuming our resources with weapons systems that we don’t need and can’t use.”
The Reagan Administration has no rational plan for our military. Instead, It acts on misinformed assumptions about the strength of the Soviet military and a presumed “window of vulnerability”, which we now know not to exist.
And Congress, rather than having the moral courage to challenge the Reagan Administration, has given Ronald Reagan almost every military request he has made, no matter how wasteful, no matter how useless, no matter how dangerous.
The biggest defense buildup since World War II has not given us a better defense. Americans feel more threatened by the prospect of war, not less so. And our national priorities become more and more distorted as the share of our country’s resources devoted to human needs diminishes.
JOHN KERRY HAS A DIFFERENT APPROACH
John Kerry believes that the time has come to take a close look at what our defense needs are and to plan for them rather than to assume we must spend indiscriminately on new weapons systems.
John Kerry believes that we can cut from $45 to $53 billion from the Reagan Defense budget this year. Some of these cuts include:
MAJOR NUCLEAR PROGRAMS
* MX Missile --- Cancel --- $5.0 billion
* B-1 Bomber --- Cancel --- $8.0 billion
* Anti-satellite system --- Cancel --- $ 99 million
* Star Wars --- Cancel --- $1.3 billion
* Tomahawk Missile --- Reduce by 50 per cent --- $294 million
LAND FORCES
(unreadable)
* AH-64 Helicopters --- Cancel --- $1.4 billion
* Division Air Defense Gun (DIVAD) --- Cancel --- $638 million
* Patriot Air Defense Missile --- Cancel --- $1.3 billion
NAVAL FORCES
* Aegis Air-Defense Cruiser --- Cancel --- $800 million
* Battleship Reactivation --- Cancel --- $453 million
AIRCRAFT
* AV-8B Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft --- Cancel --- $1.0 billion
* F-15 Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $2.3 billion
* F-14A Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $1.0 billion
* F-14D Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $286 million
* Phoenix Air-to-Air Missile --- Cancel --- $432 million
* Sparrow Air-to-Air Missile --- Cancel --- $264 million
http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/attachment.php?postid=464083
http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/attachment.php?postid=464084
In addition, acquisition of equipment and supplies should depend on real defense needs, not inter-service rivalries. “National security” is no excuse for bad management practices. The Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting Office agree that an additional $8 billion can be saved by implementing the recommendations of the President’s own Grace Commission Report.
“I will never forget that the Defense Budget is not an employment program, but a tool to provide the nation with a strong, lean and stabilizing defense posture.”
Finally, John thinks it’s time for a Senator who will stand up for what’s right and not go along with what’s expedient.
“If we don’t need the MX, the B-1, or these other weapons systems (unreadable) them. There’s no excuse for casting even one vote for unnecessary weapons of destruction and as your Senator, I will never do so.”
What the ******** is he talking about unnecessary weapons of destruction? Other than Star Wars, MX Missiles, anti-satellite missiles and battleship reactivation,all of which an argument could be made both pro and con, what could be deemed unecessary? Go through that list and check all the things he wanted to cancel that we used in Afghanistan. I hate that I'm having to vote for a man who is trying to seem tough on defense by using four months in Vietnam to go against everything he has done since he's come home in the past 30+years.
John Kerry
U.S. Senate
JOHN KERRY ON THE DEFENSE BUDGET
“We are continuing a defense buildup that is consuming our resources with weapons systems that we don’t need and can’t use.”
The Reagan Administration has no rational plan for our military. Instead, It acts on misinformed assumptions about the strength of the Soviet military and a presumed “window of vulnerability”, which we now know not to exist.
And Congress, rather than having the moral courage to challenge the Reagan Administration, has given Ronald Reagan almost every military request he has made, no matter how wasteful, no matter how useless, no matter how dangerous.
The biggest defense buildup since World War II has not given us a better defense. Americans feel more threatened by the prospect of war, not less so. And our national priorities become more and more distorted as the share of our country’s resources devoted to human needs diminishes.
JOHN KERRY HAS A DIFFERENT APPROACH
John Kerry believes that the time has come to take a close look at what our defense needs are and to plan for them rather than to assume we must spend indiscriminately on new weapons systems.
John Kerry believes that we can cut from $45 to $53 billion from the Reagan Defense budget this year. Some of these cuts include:
MAJOR NUCLEAR PROGRAMS
* MX Missile --- Cancel --- $5.0 billion
* B-1 Bomber --- Cancel --- $8.0 billion
* Anti-satellite system --- Cancel --- $ 99 million
* Star Wars --- Cancel --- $1.3 billion
* Tomahawk Missile --- Reduce by 50 per cent --- $294 million
LAND FORCES
(unreadable)
* AH-64 Helicopters --- Cancel --- $1.4 billion
* Division Air Defense Gun (DIVAD) --- Cancel --- $638 million
* Patriot Air Defense Missile --- Cancel --- $1.3 billion
NAVAL FORCES
* Aegis Air-Defense Cruiser --- Cancel --- $800 million
* Battleship Reactivation --- Cancel --- $453 million
AIRCRAFT
* AV-8B Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft --- Cancel --- $1.0 billion
* F-15 Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $2.3 billion
* F-14A Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $1.0 billion
* F-14D Fighter Aircraft --- Cancel --- $286 million
* Phoenix Air-to-Air Missile --- Cancel --- $432 million
* Sparrow Air-to-Air Missile --- Cancel --- $264 million
http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/attachment.php?postid=464083
http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/attachment.php?postid=464084
In addition, acquisition of equipment and supplies should depend on real defense needs, not inter-service rivalries. “National security” is no excuse for bad management practices. The Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting Office agree that an additional $8 billion can be saved by implementing the recommendations of the President’s own Grace Commission Report.
“I will never forget that the Defense Budget is not an employment program, but a tool to provide the nation with a strong, lean and stabilizing defense posture.”
Finally, John thinks it’s time for a Senator who will stand up for what’s right and not go along with what’s expedient.
“If we don’t need the MX, the B-1, or these other weapons systems (unreadable) them. There’s no excuse for casting even one vote for unnecessary weapons of destruction and as your Senator, I will never do so.”
What the ******** is he talking about unnecessary weapons of destruction? Other than Star Wars, MX Missiles, anti-satellite missiles and battleship reactivation,all of which an argument could be made both pro and con, what could be deemed unecessary? Go through that list and check all the things he wanted to cancel that we used in Afghanistan. I hate that I'm having to vote for a man who is trying to seem tough on defense by using four months in Vietnam to go against everything he has done since he's come home in the past 30+years.