PDA

View Full Version : NFL Standings for BMLS


jmeissen0
04 Sep 2002, 11:47 PM
This thread will contain the NFL team standings until BMLS names and cities are assured for each NFL team. If you notice any errors, please do not be hesitant to make note of it on here

-jim

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 12:20 AM
Tampa Bay... 3
Indianapolis.. 3
Denver.......... 3
Dallas............3
Tennessee..... 3
Washington... 3
NY Jets.......... 3
Atlanta.......... 3
Baltimore....... 3
Cincinatti....... 3
Cleveland....... 3
NY Giants....... 3
Philadelphia... 3
Arizona.......... 3
Houston......... 1
New Orleans... 1
Kansas City.... 1
San Francisco. 0
San Diego...... 0
Green Bay...... 0
New England.. 0
Minnesota....... 0
Buffalo........... 0
Jacksonville.... 0
Pittsburgh...... 0
Detroit............ 0
Oakland.......... 0
Carolina.......... 0
Chicago.......... 0
Seattle........... 0
St. Louis......... 0
Miami............. 0

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 03:03 AM
Tampa Bay.... 6
Cincinatti....... 6
Denver.......... 6
Tennessee..... 6
Washington... 6
NY Jets.......... 6
Atlanta.......... 4
New Orleans... 4
Dallas............ 4
Cleveland....... 4
NY Giants....... 4
Philadelphia... 4
Arizona.......... 4
Kansas City.... 4
Indianapolis... 3
Baltimore....... 3
Minnesota....... 3
San Diego...... 3
Green Bay...... 1
New England.. 1
St. Louis......... 1
Chicago.......... 1
Houston......... 1
Detroit............ 1
Carolina.......... 1
Oakland.......... 0
Jacksonville.... 0
Pittsburgh...... 0
Seattle........... 0
Buffalo........... 0
Miami............. 0
San Francisco.. 0

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 03:19 AM
Tampa Bay.... 9
NY Jets.......... 9
Denver.......... 9
Washington... 9
Atlanta.......... 7
New Orleans... 7
Tennessee..... 6
Cincinatti....... 6
Minnesota....... 6
San Diego...... 6
Philadelphia... 5
Kansas City.... 5
Cleveland....... 4
NY Giants....... 4
Dallas............ 4
Arizona.......... 4
New England.. 4
Indianapolis... 4
Baltimore....... 4
Oakland.......... 3
Jacksonville.... 3
Pittsburgh...... 3
Miami............. 3
Green Bay...... 1
St. Louis......... 1
Chicago.......... 1
Houston......... 1
Detroit............ 1
Carolina.......... 1
Seattle........... 1
Buffalo........... 1
San Francisco.. 0

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 03:31 AM
Tampa Bay.... 12
NY Jets.......... 12
Denver.......... 12
Atlanta.......... 10
Washington..... 9
Tennessee....... 9
New Orleans.... 8
Kansas City..... 8
New England... 7
NY Giants........ 7
Minnesota....... 7
San Diego....... 6
Oakland.......... 6
Cincinatti........ 6
Philadelphia.... 5
Dallas............. 5
Indianapolis.... 5
Cleveland........ 4
Detroit............ 4
Baltimore........ 4
Arizona........... 4
Jacksonville..... 4
Pittsburgh....... 4
Miami............. 4
Carolina.......... 4
San Francisco.. 3
Chicago........... 2
Houston.......... 1
Green Bay....... 1
St. Louis.......... 1
Seattle............ 1
Buffalo............ 1

jlo
05 Sep 2002, 07:42 AM
San Francisco is short a point. They had a tie in week one.

FlashMan
05 Sep 2002, 01:20 PM
Remind me why we have standings again when the regular season hasn't even started yet?

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 03:22 PM
Originally posted by FlashMan
Remind me why we have standings again when the regular season hasn't even started yet?


to make things a bit more interesting and have a 21 week schedule (20 games)... a 12 game schedule doesn't work because of byes in the nfl regular season, the extra 4 games are just being thrown in to make it closer to the length of an mls season

top 8 teams make the playoffs, and will be assigned nfl teams based on the nfl team's ranks at each level of the play offs (so that a higher seeded bmls team doesn't have a lower seeded nfl team)

-jim

jmeissen0
05 Sep 2002, 03:23 PM
Originally posted by jlo
San Francisco is short a point. They had a tie in week one.


good catch

UpTheMetro
14 Sep 2002, 06:38 PM
So just how does this fantasy league have anything to do with the MLS?? To me it just looks like an excuse to talk about american football on a soccer message board.

jmeissen0
16 Sep 2002, 12:24 AM
you are a bit right, but it's also a way to compare the scoring of soccer to football

however, i haven't really gotten around to doing last week's games or this week's games... so it's kinda dead

appoo
16 Sep 2002, 08:14 PM
Originally posted by jmeissen0
you are a bit right, but it's also a way to compare the scoring of soccer to football

however, i haven't really gotten around to doing last week's games or this week's games... so it's kinda dead

it wouldn;t look good for soccer anyhow. It would blow the MLS away

USRufnex
17 Sep 2002, 02:07 PM
Originally posted by appooOnU


it wouldn;t look good for soccer anyhow. It would blow the MLS away

Wrong answer.
Thanks for playing.

appoo
17 Sep 2002, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by USRufnex


Wrong answer.
Thanks for playing.

So whats the right answer?

USRufnex
21 Sep 2002, 03:32 PM
Originally posted by appooOnU


So whats the right answer?

NFL games take over 3 hrs. to play... soccer, 2 hrs. tops... no field goals, no time outs, no measurements of total yardage (i.e.--Rapids: 5.7 miles total offense, Wiz: 5.3 miles total offense)...

If MLS gave 7 points for every goal and a possible 3 points every time a "drive" fizzles out in scoring position, hmmm, would this make you happy?

I'd just be happy if NFL and MLB games would finish in 2 hours time instead of lasting longer than your run of the mill Wagner opera (complete with Bugs Bunny's "spear and magic helmet(s)")...