PDA

View Full Version : how was akwari? [R]


Pages : [1] 2

HartwickFan
01 Sep 2002, 11:22 AM
I wasn't able to catch the metros-la match last night -- how did akwari look? I see he went the full 90, which is a good sign, and that the metros lost 3-0, which is a bad sign (although maybe akwari didn't have anything to do with the goals).

On a related note, I miss the weekly threads on how our youth looked in their MLS games -- if anyone wants to comment on how players other than akwari looked, feel free :)

Bird
01 Sep 2002, 12:34 PM
He played a pretty solid game, initially at left back in a 4-4-2 and then at right back after Ziadie got sent off. Looked great for his first start. None of the goals were directly his fault; all came on breakdowns in central defense. If he can play consistently like he did last night, he's definitely an upgrade over Chrono.

It's been a couple years since I've seen him play, so I was surprised to see how much he's bulked up. He still has pretty good recovery speed and showed good strength challenging for the ball on the ground and in the air.

During the first half, he was mostly matched up against Cobi and only allowed him to get in a clean cross or get around him a couple of times. IIRC, the cross on one of the early goals came from Cobi on his side, but he was not marking him at the time. His positioning was a little suspect on several occasions and he got caught up the field once or twice, but he generally used his speed and strength to recover reasonably well.

I was very surprised by how confident he looked carrying the ball upfield. Overall, his distribution was very good and passing was crisp; he played several good through balls to midfielders and one or two smart diagonal passes and I can't recall any bad giveaways. After the Muttros went down by two, OZ had him press forward into the atttack and he looked dangerous overlapping and combining with Brad Davis. He made several good runs into the attacking third, carried the ball well, played a few good combinations, and didn't seem to have any difficulties adjusting to the speed of the game at the MLS level.

He's not ready to lineup for the senior Nats yet, but it was a pretty impressive first start.

DigitalTron
01 Sep 2002, 04:18 PM
Convey played well at home as DC United beat San Jose. I'm not sure whether it was intentional or whether it was simply a function of having the ball switch fields to him several times, but Convey played much of the game by starting wide left and dribbling into central midfield. He did pretty well dirbbling and passing and scored a goal. His offensive game seems to have been improved by Rongen's playing him in the center of the pitch, as he seemed more confident in the center than he has most of this season.

Defensively Hudson has taught him a lot and Convey has become a decent defender. He'll never be a Dmid or anything, but he's no longer an offense-only player.

Generally very good play, and his play on the left flank was far superior to a recooperating Ben Olsen's play on the right flank. Convey dominated a playing-out-of-position Manny Lagos.

-Tron

eneste
01 Sep 2002, 09:16 PM
I agree with Bird's assessment. Akwari was quite solid. Made a few rookie mind blanks but was clearly MLS quality. He excelled in going forward with the ball and didn't fall into the common MLS defender trap of going forward until you are surrounded and lose the ball. He would actually go forward with purpose and play the ball appropriately. He also looked more calm in the tackle than I thought he would. I would give him a B overall. Good showing.

HartwickFan
01 Sep 2002, 10:45 PM
Glad to see Akwari looked solid. Hopefully he will get better and better with experience. Now if Gooch and Yi can get some first team playing time over the next year, I'll feel a lot better about our back line for the olympics.

TexanSoccer06
02 Sep 2002, 01:08 AM
Nelly's always been very composed in his tackling, distribution, and positioning. I think his main question marks were his size and pace, but he looked pretty solid for his first professional start.

The Wanderer
02 Sep 2002, 10:42 AM
Great news. Throw him into the Olympic team pool as another professional defender.

DigitalTron
02 Sep 2002, 01:15 PM
Originally posted by TexanSoccer06
Nelly's always been very composed in his tackling, distribution, and positioning. I think his main question marks were his size and pace, but he looked pretty solid for his first professional start. Very true, and his size will always be a detriment if he settles in as a central defender. But, in what I've seen with the Metros he looks faster. I wonder if that's just because the Metros lack team speed or if he really has gotten faster. Anyway, nice job coming in at the middle of the season and contributing.

-Tron

Bird
02 Sep 2002, 01:29 PM
Originally posted by TexanSoccer06
Nelly's always been very composed in his tackling, distribution, and positioning. I think his main question marks were his size and pace, but he looked pretty solid for his first professional start.

MLSNet has him listed as 5-11, 180 now, so he's probably still a "tweener" on paper (possibly a little too small for central defense at the international level, maybe not enough pace for the wing). If the matchup against Cobi was any measure, he may have enough recovery speed to get the job done on the wing, especially as his "quickness" and ability to anticipate improves -- it's not like Vanney and Regis are exactly speedburners or Cherundolo's going to dunk over anyone anytime soon. ;)

TexanSoccer06
02 Sep 2002, 11:44 PM
Originally posted by Bird
If the matchup against Cobi was any measure, he may have enough recovery speed to get the job done on the wingAgreed, he didn't have the pace to stay with Cobi, but Jones' is still one of the quicker players in MLS. If Nelly can improve his pace, I can see him fighting for an outside back spot in 06.

HartwickFan
03 Sep 2002, 11:01 AM
Or he just needs to develop the ball skill and vision of JOB, who is probably at least as slow as Akwari, but seems to be holding down the left back spot at Ajax.

GersMan
03 Sep 2002, 11:58 AM
Glad to see this thread, especially as I made a point to stay up and watch the match, and then fell asleep after the first goal. Sorry everyone. Please don't call my fanaticism into quesiton, I just stumbled for a moment in time.

lmorin
03 Sep 2002, 05:01 PM
I have to disagree a bit on the Akwari assessment for the LA game. Let's put it this way--yes, he was as good as the rest of the Metrostars' defense. I felt (contrary to a view expressed above) that he was responsible for the first goal because he hung way off the attacker who centered the ball leading to the goal. Akwari stood and watched. He was schooled by Cobi once in the first half. But as was was noted by the commentators (Wynalda, especially) Cobi did very little aggressive attacking, so there wasn't really much of a test down Akwari's side. The third goal came from a Cobi cross through the Akwari left back coverage area, but I think there had been a defensive marking switch, so I don't think Akwari was at fault for the cross. If not, however, he might have to take some blame for the total absence of man-marking on Ruiz who was open in the middle. That defensive lapse seems typical of the Metros defense lately. It's rather sorry to see as the Metros have an exciting attack not getting adequate support.

The Wanderer
03 Sep 2002, 09:49 PM
Originally posted by HartwickFan
Or he just needs to develop the ball skill and vision of JOB, who is probably at least as slow as Akwari, but seems to be holding down the left back spot at Ajax.

This kind of ball skill is learned at a younger age than 20(Akwari's age) generally IMHO.

He could have a good MLS career but it'd surprise me if he made the national team as a regular contributor.

352klr
03 Sep 2002, 11:59 PM
I tend to agree with you Wanderer. I had heard all the hype about how good he and Yi were and then when I watched them in the U-20 qualifying a year and a half ago, I didn't understand what all the fuss was about, especially given they were playing against TFC teams only. They both seemed very slow, very clumsy, not composed on the ball, and somewhat slow of mind as well. Not exactly what we're looking for at the U-23 level, let alone senior team.

Mason16
04 Sep 2002, 07:53 AM
Originally posted by 352klr
I tend to agree with you Wanderer. I had heard all the hype about how good he and Yi were and then when I watched them in the U-20 qualifying a year and a half ago, I didn't understand what all the fuss was about, especially given they were playing against TFC teams only. They both seemed very slow, very clumsy, not composed on the ball, and somewhat slow of mind as well. Not exactly what we're looking for at the U-23 level, let alone senior team.

a year and a half ago????????

352klr
04 Sep 2002, 12:04 PM
Yep, a year and a half ago. It's not like he would have made some giant developmental leap at UCLA(Yi neither). It's great they finally went pro, but just because they've always been in the youth set-up doesn't mean I'm going to automatically put them in the lineup like some people around here seem to want to do. We've got lots of defenders at that level playing professionally now and selection should be based on how well you're playing, not how many US Youth teams you've played on in the past. If Akwari and Yi don't get enough PT and perform well in that PT, they have no business being on the team, whereas it seems that some people around here are just used to seeing there names on the teamsheets and figure it's some logical progression for them to move up to the next team just because theyre getting older.

HartwickFan
04 Sep 2002, 02:45 PM
Originally posted by 352klr
We've got lots of defenders at that level playing professionally now . . .

We do? I must be missing some, because last time I tried, I was having trouble counting on one hand defenders who are eligible for the olympics and playing professionally -- the only one I can think of is Kelly Gray. Who knows when Gooch will actually start playing for Metz and Yi for Antwerp. I guess Seth Trembly gets a few minutes of playing time every couple of weeks. And Simek plays for the Arse youth team (it's better than college, to be sure, but I would not want our olympic team back line to be stocked with players who haven't seen a wink of first team professional ball). Whitbread saw some minutes with the Liverpool reserves in August, but who knows whether he'll play for the U.S. and it's unlikely he'll crack the firs team before the olympics. There's some guy Burciaga, who I've never seen before, but who has had KC listed as his club for the past couple of years.

Who am I missing? It seems to me that we have a wealth of attacking players who are eligible for the olympics and who have solid, first-team, professional experience: Donovan, Bease, Quaranta, Convey, Buddle, Casey, Beckerman, Martino, Davis, Barclay, Johnson (he hasn't played much yet, but by the olympics, hopefully he'll be more seasoned).

On the other hand, at this point it seems to me that there is a real risk that our Olympic team will have a back line with only one or two players who have played first team professional soccer -- Akwari and Gray.

metroflip73
04 Sep 2002, 03:32 PM
Burciaga played in the Toulon tournament with the U20s. I actually saw him. He's 6 ft+ or so and plays either on the flank or in the middle. He didn't play much, but he got some run.

willydonc
04 Sep 2002, 05:43 PM
Originally posted by metroflip73
Burciaga played in the Toulon tournament with the U20s. I actually saw him. He's 6 ft+ or so and plays either on the flank or in the middle. He didn't play much, but he got some run.
He tore up his knee in the spring and this season is pretty much a washout for him.