PDA

View Full Version : Meltdown In Mexico Piece in 90:00 Magazine


Pages : [1] 2

unckaos
16 Apr 2004, 02:24 PM
Did anyone read the Meltdown in Mexico Piece in 90:00 Minutes Magazine? It's in the issue with Alexi Lalas on the cover.

It's about time someone asks who is responsible for what happened in Mexico with Olympic qualifying. The piece really seems to question the fact that the coaches have been allowed to make up excuses instead of taking responsibilty. I am tired of hearing the excuses that coaches have been giving.

spot
17 Apr 2004, 09:30 AM
Did anyone read the Meltdown in Mexico Piece in 90:00 Minutes Magazine?

Based on the response, it appears that no, no one did.

russ
17 Apr 2004, 10:52 AM
Did anyone read the Meltdown in Mexico Piece in 90:00 Minutes Magazine? It's in the issue with Alexi Lalas on the cover.

It's about time someone asks who is responsible for what happened in Mexico with Olympic qualifying. The piece really seems to question the fact that the coaches have been allowed to make up excuses instead of taking responsibilty. I am tired of hearing the excuses that coaches have been giving.

Is there anymore to the article than that?It does sound interesting.

I should point out that the fact this question is even being asked and can only be responded to by VS with Rivalries-style smack is a clear indication that we must be the dominant country in CONCACAF.

Teams that aren't strong enough don't have to ask why they lose.

gettysburg32
17 Apr 2004, 11:03 AM
Did anyone read the Meltdown in Mexico Piece in 90:00 Minutes Magazine? It's in the issue with Alexi Lalas on the cover.

It's about time someone asks who is responsible for what happened in Mexico with Olympic qualifying. The piece really seems to question the fact that the coaches have been allowed to make up excuses instead of taking responsibilty. I am tired of hearing the excuses that coaches have been giving.

Yes I'm outraged as well. I mean I just sat straight up in bed this morning, two months after the match and said, "God.damn it, the United States U-23 lost to Mexico U-23 two months ago I now I'm really pissed about it!" And then I rolled over and went back to sleep.

Ok, the US full nat team is 5-1-1 vs. Mexico since the beginning of 2000. Overall the US has outscored Mexico 10-1 in those seven matches. I think US soccer has come a heck of a long way when a loss by a youth team IN MEXICO meant as much as it did to both US and Mexican supporters. It shows that US soccer has reached a level where we (US fans) always expect to beat Mexico and not just hope to beat Mexico. However, they are still just that, "overreactions and exaggerations", especially when it's a) one game, b) one youth level game, and c) one youth level game IN MEXICO vs. Mexico.

Brownswan
17 Apr 2004, 11:18 AM
Actually... not qualifying could be a blessing in disguise. The situation is a mess in Athens: stadiums will barely be ready, and that means infrastructure -- roads, plumbing, electricity -- will be dicey, and security is a real issue. The UK even wants to bring in their own, armed security, which Greece rightly rejects. Athens would turn into Dodge City, if not Beirut (talking about the bad, old days, of course).

But memories of Munich, 1972, remain vivid, and American athletes and citizens will be prime targets this summer.

I say pull out now. Express regrets, but in the interest of general safety, it is best if the prime targets of the terrorists that thrive in Europe simply avoid the scene. We will give them nothing to shoot at, and ya'll have a good day.

russ
17 Apr 2004, 11:33 AM
Let me get this straight.You're suggesting that we walk away from the Athens Games citing fear for our athletes' safety?
NOW this thread might get really interesting.

SABuffalo786
17 Apr 2004, 08:33 PM
Actually... not qualifying could be a blessing in disguise. The situation is a mess in Athens: stadiums will barely be ready, and that means infrastructure -- roads, plumbing, electricity -- will be dicey, and security is a real issue. The UK even wants to bring in their own, armed security, which Greece rightly rejects. Athens would turn into Dodge City, if not Beirut (talking about the bad, old days, of course).

But memories of Munich, 1972, remain vivid, and American athletes and citizens will be prime targets this summer.

I say pull out now. Express regrets, but in the interest of general safety, it is best if the prime targets of the terrorists that thrive in Europe simply avoid the scene. We will give them nothing to shoot at, and ya'll have a good day.


Not opposed.


I don't care either way, though.

babytiger2001
17 Apr 2004, 11:21 PM
Thread split, with the trash talk moved to World Rivalries. To talk trash, do so there, please.

Let's keep the talk focused on the article, folks. The article first, and the USA v Mexico friendly second.

By the way, is that article available online anywhere?

unckaos
17 Apr 2004, 11:47 PM
By the way, is that article available online anywhere?[/QUOTE]

I don't think it is available online, but the issue is at bookstores right now, so you can find it at the Barnes and Nobles.

Ricky_DCU
18 Apr 2004, 12:51 AM
Whether you agree with it or not, the article itself is basically a glorified big soccer rant, but the issue has plenty of good stuff in it, so check it out.

lurking
18 Apr 2004, 01:16 AM
Yes I'm outraged as well. I mean I just sat straight up in bed this morning, two months after the match and said, "God.damn it, the United States U-23 lost to Mexico U-23 two months ago I now I'm really pissed about it!" And then I rolled over and went back to sleep.

Ok, the US full nat team is 5-1-1 vs. Mexico since the beginning of 2000. Overall the US has outscored Mexico 10-1 in those seven matches. I think US soccer has come a heck of a long way when a loss by a youth team IN MEXICO meant as much as it did to both US and Mexican supporters. It shows that US soccer has reached a level where we (US fans) always expect to beat Mexico and not just hope to beat Mexico. However, they are still just that, "overreactions and exaggerations", especially when it's a) one game, b) one youth level game, and c) one youth level game IN MEXICO vs. Mexico.
The Mexico game was just the capper on a thuroughly uninspired, completely disorganized effort by that team. I have to question the men in charge of that trip, and how such a poor effort was allowed to be put forth.

romperedes15
18 Apr 2004, 01:36 AM
Hi I'm from Mexico and I've got nothing against you guys in fact I think US-soccer has improved big time... I even think you guys might be a good contender for the next world cup.. but I'll have to disagree about what you say about our youngsters going to the Olympics..... I think that the Mexican sub-23 actually did a great job in that tournament and I also think they deserve to go to the Olympics... not that the US don't... but it just isn't the right time.... I hope that the rivallery between the US and MX becomes something like what's lived in Argentina and Uruguay......(pretty exciting)

nancyb
18 Apr 2004, 11:35 PM
I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with regarding our opinion of our youngsters going to the Olympics, but welcome to the boards romperedes15.

I think the opinion of most US fans is that the loss was caused by a combination poor coaching decisions and poor play in the semi-final, winner take all game. But, the US environment generally means that coaching screw ups are little scrutinized and rarely punished.

DamonEsquire
19 Apr 2004, 10:10 AM
Subscription is on the way! I do miss out on post. The return leg will salivate fangs.

unckaos
23 Apr 2004, 01:18 PM
Hey, it looks like 90 Minutes has a link on their site for the article. If you go to their homepage, www.90soccer.com, and click on page 42 Under What's Inside, it will take you to the Meltdown in Mexico piece.

SamsArmySam
23 Apr 2004, 03:22 PM
Thanks for the link, Unckaos.

And Gettysburg, yeah, it was just one game. But it was the one game that REALLY mattered. And it means U.S. Soccer will not be represented at the Olympics.

While I do think it's an exaggeration to say the loss was a "major setback" for international soccer in this country, it was definitely more than just "one youth game."

tab5g
23 Apr 2004, 03:31 PM
does anyone have a list of the other top 20 full mens national teams whose U23 teams did not qualify for the Olympics in 2004?

I know Brasil is on that list, who else is?

lurking
24 Apr 2004, 11:21 PM
I watched the Rapids quite a few times last year... I watched the U-23 game against Guatamala I think (last group game)... and I just finished watching SJ-Col.. and I have to think, how on God's green earth can Mooch be so stupid as not to start Beckerman in midfield against Mexico in that game? The kid has great vision and touch, and can do it while playing a defensive or central midfield role. He is so far above Carrol and Pause it boggles my mind.

What an idiot, and its outrageous that Mooch still has a job as anything but an advance scout.

Shaster
25 Apr 2004, 02:39 AM
does anyone have a list of the other top 20 full mens national teams whose U23 teams did not qualify for the Olympics in 2004?

I know Brasil is on that list, who else is?

Spain is the one of them.

hackattack
26 Apr 2004, 11:29 PM
Who's the Lincir guy who wrote it, and what qualifies him to be a critic?