Devil_78
05 May 2009, 09:44 PM
Interesting article in the Daily Star yesterday. Yes I know, Daily Star is a total rag... Though it has also been carried in the Sun and the Telegraph...
However, the article basically says the Glazers are looking to move forwards with an expansion of Old Trafford up to a reported 95,000 capacity.
Now, imagine YOU are the Property Manager at OT. The Glazers are leaving the final decision to you, and thusly have handed you a cheque for £100,000,000 to cover the reported cost of the expansion.
What would be your choice?
1)Expand? Get the truly massive crowds in, generating huge amounts of cash? But piling on the debt since to expand means flattening homes and building over a railway line? Or...
2)Leave it as it is. 75,000 is plenty, and the huge debt incurred for expansion means any financial benefits will not be felt for years. If the whole stand is season tickets at the top price, it will take an absolute minimum of 6 years, more likely a decade to make that money back!
What would you do, and your reasoning...
However, the article basically says the Glazers are looking to move forwards with an expansion of Old Trafford up to a reported 95,000 capacity.
Now, imagine YOU are the Property Manager at OT. The Glazers are leaving the final decision to you, and thusly have handed you a cheque for £100,000,000 to cover the reported cost of the expansion.
What would be your choice?
1)Expand? Get the truly massive crowds in, generating huge amounts of cash? But piling on the debt since to expand means flattening homes and building over a railway line? Or...
2)Leave it as it is. 75,000 is plenty, and the huge debt incurred for expansion means any financial benefits will not be felt for years. If the whole stand is season tickets at the top price, it will take an absolute minimum of 6 years, more likely a decade to make that money back!
What would you do, and your reasoning...