Not really- most every team is traveling a long way to play- makes sense to give them all the same number of games. "Winning" the tournament is fairly irrelevant.
Little known fact. In Catalan, the word Xavi means "drool," Busquets means "mucus," and Puyol, Iniesta and Messi are all ways of describing diapers.
I'm currently in correspondence with Sunil Gulatti on our new genetic modifying program where we create the perfect footballer from a combination of sheep and lion stem cells. We beat Mexico in a recent stem cell friendly, 2-0 of course.
USA 0 - Japan 0 at the half. Score is now USA 1 - Japan 1 73rd min EL Tri 3 - China 0 65th Update: 4-0 77th
Both semifinals went to PKs. Portugal vs Russia for the title; France vs England for third place. http://www.mondial-football-montaigu.fr/
there the club version to nations version going on simultaneously. Santa Cruz breakers is loan US team and got blown out. embarrassing
Sadly it wasn't 2-0. Honestly, I don't care about results here at all. They got a lot of good games in andeven practiced PKs. Here's a minute writeup for the 1-1 Japan result: http://www.ussoccer.com/News/U-17-MNT/2012/04/US-U17-MNT-Ties-Japan-Advances-on-Penalties.aspx Bradford Jamieson IV (2nd best name) scored the lone regulation goal.
Bradford Jamieson sounds like some sort of high end whiskey. Yup.........results right now aren't important. Williams is probably giving all of his players some opportunities, experimenting with some guys, etc. And without seeing the game, it's hard to make any intelligent comments. It's always nice to get a win over Mexico, though