A week late, but humorous nonetheless. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFnR6_LhTvg"]YouTube - Charlie Sheen: Motivational Speaker for the San Jose Earthquakes[/ame]
Maybe the FO can christen the visitor's SG section at Buck Shaw as the "Winning Like Charlie Sheen" section.
Kudos to whomever put that together. An excellent job. However, I do question the ethics of using the mentally ill for a promo.
This is a beauty from the Timber's Army [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVW3tYo1UYk"]YouTube - MLS is here, are you ready?[/ame]
Here's the original: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vzqGB4WLkY"]YouTube - Local Football[/ame]
Thus proving that you can take a mediocre original and turn it into something much more affecting. The Portland version has better production values and better music. My main complaint is the text that fades into the background. Otherwise, brilliant adaptation. No reason we can't do the same!
Apart from issues of basic morality and intellectual property law, the Portland re-make is just dandy.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2c6yDcdr_I]San Jose Earthquakes 2011 Commercial: Piñata Alternate Ending[/ame] GO SAN JOSE EARTHQUAKES!!! -G
The takeaway being...if I bring my kid to a Quakes game, he'll get cheap candy? I'm still not getting the point of the pinata -- that is to attract Mexican fans? Tenuous connection. Sorry, marketing dept, not quite there yet.
i'm with you in this one TS.But I think this "commercial" is just trying to be cute with the existing fans and is not targeting any new fans for the club.
And it's the most popular Quakes ad on YouTube, at 7500 or so views and counting, which is something like 4x greater than number of views of last year's ads, for whatever reason.
How many views would they get running the ad during Quakes games on Comcast SportNet Bay Area or something, and what is the cost per view compared to youtube views (i.e. compared to $0.00 )? And if 7k views is not impressive, then why do last years ads have only a small fraction of that? I don't know the answer. Maybe someone is working to get more views of the ads this year, or maybe the ad is more viral than last year's for some reason. Now that you mention it, I would say that there is a little bit of "Rebecca Blackness" in the ads, though in her case I'm afraid that the Rebecca Blackness was unintentional.