You must just be confused. I forgive you though, you can't choose where you're born. And after I read posts like yours I thank God I was one of the lucky ones to be born in the USA. Bruce Springsteen, you know The Boss? He even wrote about a song about the privilege.
I would argue that American players are fouled, hacked at significantly less based on the style of play - both by individuals and as a team. I know the American NT system pretty well. What you are taught in school leagues is also something the rarely resembles soccer, which is why the youth development system is working to move their most promising players out of the high school and college system. But you knew that too.
Moving prospects out of schools systems isn't suddenly going to make American players dive -or- fool the refs. Like I mentioned, this fundamental of being on your feet will exist from here on out.
Clearly. But you are making it sound like these schools are teaching some noble art of not cheating. What they teach is go hard, lead with your shoulder, go harder, grab the shirt, go even harder, stomp his foot if you have to. Like I said, I am very familiar. Doesn't matter anyway and this argument if off-topic. Mods, feel free to delete.
I've been an athlete since I could walk thru college, my Dad played minor league baseball and one thing I notice when I talk to friends who are not from America is that here we are taught at an early age to have respect for our opponent and the sport. Faking, acting and the sort is generally frowned upon, Americans generally speaking are into fair play and root for the under dog. My wife who is not from here doesn't understand it why cheating bothers me so much, friends who are not from here don't see it like I do. IMO its cultural, not saying it makes American's better but it is a core value in youth up thru college athletics to win or lose gracefully. Sorry for the off topic reply...
tl;dr: @temesgen needs a hug I know what you mean though, they emphasize sportsmanship and non-faking, and toughing it out when you're down. I've always found it interesting that this is the primary reason that some Americans hate soccer.
The reason Americans hate FOOOOTBALL, is because they suck at it. If they were good, we wouldn't hear the end of it.
It's unfortunate that soccer isn't popular in America but I understand those that dislike it because of the diving. Like many, I am pretty much sick of how the refs screwed the team. Players have no dignity. It's a shame that they fall and and "sell" a foul. Its not just the game of soccer but diving and flopping exist in basketball too.
'Muricans are very good at flopping, they don't like 'soccer' because they aren't very good at it. The end.
Those are manly flops, some of you obviously don't understand the difference but you're so blinded by jealousy that I can see where you might have difficulties. I bet some of you claiming Americans don't like soccer because we're not good at it come from countries with worse soccer teams than ours and your people "like" soccer. We don't not like soccer because we're bad at it, if we liked soccer we'd rule it like we do almost every other sport. Lucky for some of you we are a magnanimous country and we allow things like the Winter Olympics for participants in obscure sports to know what it feels like to be a winner.
I remember the 2010 WC where you were lucky to pass the group stages, with that last minute goal from Donovan. If it weren't for that Slovenia with about a 100x less inhabitants would've knocked you out. Think abou that! Plus we'd own you in ski jumping and Maze owned Vonn! Wooo!
Why do I have to think about it? We made it out of the group stages. "What if...?" and "If only..." are consolation questions for losers at the end of the day. Yes you would "own" us in ski jumping but as I said we are a giving people and allow for you to do just that in the Winter Olympics. Everyone should know what it feels like to be a winner at least once.
LOL. The US is doing some smart stuff in youth development. It is a bit un-American in its approach because technical development is getting more attention than results (and because the curriculum was built based on top European academies). I give the USSF a ton of credit for those bold steps. The US U17 team that just won the Nike tournament in Florida - against the likes of Brazil, Portugal and England - played a much nicer soccer. A lot of those kids are training overseas already and many come from true soccer cultures and background. Definitely headed in the right direction.
Sigh...@Alma Merengue no one needs your little "cookies" for approval, Europeans don't put enough sugar in them anyway, I'll bet every.single. player. on that U17 team could bench press more weight than any other players across Europe in the same age group. So put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Yep, and many times the best players in America are people you will never hear of. Soccer here has become a richman's sport - parents often spend thousands of dollars driving and flying kids to tournaments every weekend. Some of the most gifted players you'll ever meet didn't have the time, money or support to do this but our parks are filled with them playing pickup games. Many times the parents are immigrants and place an emphasis on school or are the parents are working two jobs to support the family and simply can't offer the support for sports but in time this is changing. I know its been said before but America will be producing better results in 10 years and while we're at it the women are feared world wide.
Seriously, it has nothing to do with Americans being shit at it. I believe it's primarily a cultural thing. Here's one interesting article on the subject: http://espnfc.com/blog/_/name/relegationzone/id/262?cc=5739
I've said it like 4-5 times (but i like saying it), the lack of football talent in USA is due to the lack of street football. Street football is better as kids learn freely and have more creative freedom, while coaches are stricter to dribblers and guys who like to do fun stuff in football. Street football FTW!