The A-League Expansion Thread

Discussion in 'Australian A-League' started by Azzballz the Great, Mar 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bass0r

    Bass0r Member

    Jan 18, 2009
    Tokyo/N. Velidhoo
    Club:
    Urawa RD
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    No it wasn't. J2 wasn't introduced for years after J1. Football in Japan was developed by using currently-existing clubs that were capable of meeting certain criteria.
    Also, the running cost of a lower division at the moment wouldn't be a great deal different to the A-League, unless we use ex-NSL clubs that already have facilities and allow them to continue running as semi-pro teams.

    With the current instability of the A-League, introducing another division right now will be a massive slap in the face and throw everything and everyone further out of balance.
     
  2. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, to be fair, while J2 was founded years after J1 came around, JSL has been around for the entirety of J1's existence and was Japan's D2 prior to J2's creation.

    However, J2 was created at the same time that attendance started to turn around for J-League. I'm not saying that is why their attendance turned around, but J2 was implemented in 1999 and the bottom of the trough for J1 attendance was 2000.
     
  3. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    It's a complete non-starter and may never happen in this country.
     
  4. Zednaught

    Zednaught Member

    Jan 11, 2011
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Forgive me for saying this, but I don't think you understand the Australian sporting landscape.
    No sporting league of any importance (even in the days when every state had their own 'national' league) has ever had relegation/promotion.
    The FFA should look and learn about what has succeeded in Australia and forget about what happens in foreign countries where their code is not the 4th football code.

    Costs would also not be cheaper for a second division team. A team would need to have money to attract players to get a higher standard than state league teams. This money does not exist.
    Travel fees would cost more from Townsville and Geelong than from Townsville to Melbourne.

    A second division team will really struggle to get any sponsorship and corporate support. A second division team could not also exist in a city with a first division team.

    Also FFA could not afford the possibilty for one of the major five cities (in particular Melbourne and Sydney) to not have a team in the top division.
     
  5. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    HAHA Spoken like a person who knows nothing about Australia and the situation with football here, the huge travelling distances, where people are located, how little money there is.
    Come down and live here for a few months first, before you shoot your mouth off about us learning from country's who don't face these challenges.
     
  6. napolisoccer

    napolisoccer Member

    NYCFC - Napoli
    Feb 20, 2005
    Napoli
    Club:
    SSC Napoli
    Nat'l Team:
    Italy
    The 2011/2012 A league will have again 11 teams ?
     
  7. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    More likely 10. If things go really bad, 9. But probably 10.
     
  8. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Maybe we should rename this the A-League Contraction Thread?

    Also, apparently this genius move was going to involve Miron taking over from Ange. FMD indeed.
     
  9. ZoidburgFC

    ZoidburgFC New Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    Venus
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    OMG I thought the NRL had problems, the FFA are a bunch of circus clowns!
     
  10. Sporting Real

    Sporting Real Member+

    Jun 29, 2011
    Kansas City
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So I was looking up NSL soccer teams on Wikipedia at work today, and it got me thinking. How come the A League created a bunch of whole new teams when they founded instead of using existing teams and tapping into their existing fan bases? Better yet, why aren't they doing like MLS, and just giving expansion franchises to successful, popular lower level teams? Like Adelaide City, (who have a wicked logo and color scheme. Look 'em up) or Sydney City?

    Look at the success of the Melbourne Derby. Imagine if they had that going in Adelaide and Sydney too. That would be crazy! Anyway, I think they should start plundering the lower divisions, a la MLS. Adelaide City, step right up
     
  11. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    MLS isn't just giving franchises to successful lower level teams.. The Sounders paid $20 million, Vancouver and Portland paid $30 million, and Montreal paid $40 million.

    I'll leave why A-League created new teams for someone else to answer. :)
     
  12. el-capitano

    el-capitano Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 30, 2005
    Sydney
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Its heading towards a whole new subject, but the old NSL clubs tended to be ethnic based, and also tended to have problems with their images, due to their fan's tendencies to portray occasional violent streaks.

    This, together with the strong ethnic base, tended to turn away any new fans of the World Game, which the new A-League was trying to avoid.

    By creating all new clubs from scratch, this was meant to give the league a more professional feel, although it has created a strong divide between the new football and the old football.

    These older clubs will get their chance in any Cup the FFA finally decide on, but they won't be joining the A-League.
     
  13. zhuangzi

    zhuangzi Member

    Feb 7, 2008
    Australia
    Club:
    Sydney FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Very few NSL clubs were a) able to meet A-League franchise criteria and b) non-ethnically aligned. Those that were did make the transition - Perth Glory, Adelaide United, Newcastle United and NZ Football Kingz were all NSL clubs, and Glory was the model for the newly created Melbourne, Sydney and Central Coast sides.

    Adelaide City, per your example are Italian based, Sydney City was supported by the Bondi/Eastern Suburbs Jewish community, etc etc - these clubs had little appeal to mainstream fans and by and large weren't and aren't capable of operating in the A-League environment.

    It was a divisive issue at the time and the wounds within the football community are only beginning to heal but it's hard to argue the break shouldn't have been made.
     
  14. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    Additionally to what EC and Z have said, a lot of those clubs were/are alienating in their local areas. Their membership bases are passionate, but small and with limited opportunities for growth. Adelaide City, for example, is roundly hated by every football fan in Adelaide who doesn't support them. That's partly related to the fact that they're seen as 'the Italian club', but also because of the bitter rivalries built up in the state leagues over their history. That was somewhat problematic to the 'one city, one community, one club' ethos of the new league when it was founded.

    Even with the efforts to keep the clubs in the A-League separate, there has still been problems. Due to similarities in colours and financial backers, a lot of people regard Brisbane Roar and Sydney FC as basically fronts for the Brisbane Lions (Dutch club) and Sydney City (Jewish club) respectively. As a result a lot of the fans of their local rivals refuse to support them. That's pretty damaging in a market where soccer fans are already a minority.

    It's a shame that a lot of these clubs are excluded from the professional level, given that they have such rich histories and passionate fans - heck, in my home town (Newcastle) we have some of the oldest soccer clubs in the world, dating back to the 19th century. But the reality is that a successful professional soccer league in Australia requires broad community appeal and most of those clubs can't deliver on that.
     
  15. Sporting Real

    Sporting Real Member+

    Jun 29, 2011
    Kansas City
    Club:
    Sporting Kansas City
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I knew a lot of teams had ethnic ties, I just didn't know they were still so strong. Sounds like Canada. They're domestic has an entire ethnic team division.

    Are there any existing clubs w/o strong ethnic ties and that with the right backing could be a part of future expansion? Or will certain derbies only happen when they get FFA Cup and running next year?
     
  16. Caesar

    Caesar Moderator
    Staff Member

    Mar 3, 2004
    Oztraya
    Not really. Most of the big clubs outside of the A-League are deeply rooted in ethnic communities - Dutch, German, Greek, Serbian, Croatian, Macedonian, Italian, Jewish, you name it.

    The first clubs in Australia were founded by Anglo-Irish immigrants - the reason there are so many old clubs in the Hunter Valley is because the Welsh and northern English coalminers brought football with them in the late 1800s - but the game really took off with the post-WWII immigration boom from central and southern Europe. They pretty much built the football culture in Australia (and the NSL) from scratch, so they pretty much dominate the club landscape.

    It is very similar to Canada, really. Football administration in Australia has struggled for decades to try and appeal to both the traditional ethnic communities and the 'silent majority' of kids from other backgrounds (both Anglo and other minorities) who grow up playing soccer and/or support foreign clubs but not domestic ones. So far it's failed pretty badly to reconcile both with each other. The ethnic teams are proud of their heritage and their contribution to the sport in Australia, and resent being marginalised. The manufactured A-League clubs have a broader appeal, but they struggle to develop an adequately large core support base.

    There's not really an easy solution. With Australian football, rugby league, rugby union and cricket to compete with - not to mention second tier sports like basketball - a sustainable, professional soccer league in a country of 20 million people needs every bit of support it can get. Unfortunately, the people interested in soccer are either too splintered or too fickle in their support to get everyone moving in the same direction together for any length of time.
     
  17. jimbregas

    jimbregas Member

    May 20, 2010
    Sydney, Australia
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    The one state league club that keeps getting brought up as a possible A-League club is the Woolongong/South Coast Wolves (pretty sure they have no major ethnic ties?). Maybe in a few years time they could, but they recently went through some financial troubles and are just getting back on their feet. Also the Canberra Cosmos could also be suitable, but they haven't been a very good club historically (not that good, no support).

    If there are going to be any new derbies created they will most likely be from entirely new teams (West Sydney) or during the FFA cup as SR said.
     
  18. el-capitano

    el-capitano Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 30, 2005
    Sydney
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Don't forget you don't need to be from the same city to have a derby/rivalry game. I'd say Melbourne v Sydney is one of THE biggest games in the A-League. ;)
     
  19. FAR-QUE

    FAR-QUE New Member

    Dec 10, 2005
    The expense of going national (in a league bases) for a club are two damn high to be sustainable.

    The only league that would be expanded like what you discribed would be the NSWPL with Canberra FC.
     
  20. AllWhitebeliever

    AllWhitebeliever Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2006
    On the injury table
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    New Zealand
    Not really. Basically any new expanded franchise would have to present themselves as new conceptual entity outside existing clubs at state league since any existing state league clubs from the old NSL that isn't invited to A-League has deep ethnic ties.

    So it is not a far idea from the FFA, that they would like clubs that hasn't has those old ethnic history and be located in an untapped football area as long as the finances are there. A prime example would be the Gold Coast.

    However that would be a costly affair as there isn't a traditional home crowd base for football. As you know, Gold Coast has the worse crowd attendance record in the A-League but yet has one of the richest owners.

    So the FFA should really focus back on some of the lesser clubs and look at their fan-based make up and the area that they are from. Teams from Canberra and Tasmania has to be high up their expansion list in the near future as well as maybe a second NZ team from the South Island (although that is a bit too far in the future) since they don't have strong ethnic ties as the urban clubs, cover a significant population base, easily developed as a new club along regional lines and significantly, they have less other sporting code to complete against.
     
  21. Zednaught

    Zednaught Member

    Jan 11, 2011
    Club:
    Adelaide United
    Tasmania doesn't even have the resources to support an AFL team (hell they had issues financing a VFL team)- let alone an A-League team.
    There is also the massive North-South divide as well as the fact that neither Bellerive or York Park are really suited as stadiums.

    Logically the next club should come from Western Sydney and play out of either Parramatta or Penrith- both with a good standard rectangular stadium. Canberra or Wollongong would be next in line.

    Geelong would be fourth in line and would draw supporters from Werribee and South West Melbourne as well. Geelong has a highly succesful AFL team which was rated in the top 4 most valuable clubs in the country. Kardinia Park is quite narrow and would be a decent ground for A-League.
     
  22. AllWhitebeliever

    AllWhitebeliever Moderator
    Staff Member

    Jun 4, 2006
    On the injury table
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    New Zealand
    True, Tasmania is a bit backwater but what I understood is that the local football runs a decent system in the north and in the south and the playing numbers is very strong compare to the AFL. Some of the AFL players from Tasmania plays in the Melbourne but on playing numbers, football is better than Aussie rules in Tas.
     
  23. el-capitano

    el-capitano Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 30, 2005
    Sydney
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    http://www.smh.com.au/sport/a-league/canberra-wants-aleague-berth-by-2013-20110916-1kdb5.html
     
  24. el-capitano

    el-capitano Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 30, 2005
    Sydney
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Its back! ;)

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...w-team-in-sydney/story-e6frey4r-1226227128172
     
  25. Yoshou

    Yoshou Fan of the CCL Champ

    May 12, 2009
    Seattle
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I dunno.. It sounds like Tana might be needed back at the Glory with the current owner throwing the fans under the bus for not supporting his under-performing team.
     

Share This Page