Tevez or Torres?

Discussion in 'Premier League' started by ApproachWithCaution, Oct 8, 2007.

  1. Teso Dos Bichos 2004-2012

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    *sigh*

    I clearly meant Jol.
          
  2. Bemsims New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Location:
    Spain
    Torres is the best player of Spain
  3. mainevent New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    I have to pick Teves because he pretty much saved the Hammers from an inevitable relegation. Also very speedy.

    Torres is good though.
  4. Gandalf The Red BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 23, 2006
    torres is better then teves funboy:rolleyes:
  5. Gandalf The Red BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 23, 2006
    lol get a load of little miss after the game, pitty you didnt show some sack before hand, coward:rolleyes:
  6. Jono-NZ New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Fernando Torres. Nuff said.

    Although Tevez is a wonderful player, he would be a gem to any team.
  7. eliostar1 Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 25, 2008
    I'm a United fan , but I would say Torres.
  8. GranCanMan Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Location:
    Manchester
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    England
    Coward? I predicted a convincing win a week before the game. Why wouldn't I? The games are always tight but we've beaten Liverpool for the last 2 or 3 years in the league every time. I have seen nothing this year from either side to suggest otherwise and made my prediction accordingly. I suggest you check out the Man Utd/Liverpool thread before you go making judgemental statements about people football opinions.

    I predicted 3-0. I just didn't think it would so one sided when it came.
  9. GranCanMan Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Location:
    Manchester
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    England
  10. Gandalf The Red BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 23, 2006
  11. ranny fash New Member

    Member Since:
    May 18, 2005
    Location:
    notts
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC

    ...errrrrrr..........

    why the hell would anyone suggest Tevez, Rooney or Carrick have hit poor form??
  12. Grinners89 BigSoccer Supporter

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Country:
    Australia
    Well...errrrr...i didnt make that post yesterday. Dont know why your quoting a post i made a few weeks ago.
  13. gottfried New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2008
    For this last months I would say Torres, But overall this season then it is Tevez
  14. ranny fash New Member

    Member Since:
    May 18, 2005
    Location:
    notts
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC
    oh yeah good point. i was just reading throught he whole thread for the first time without paying attention to when posts were made. but anyhow, were Tevez, Rooney, and Carrick really playing badly a few weeks ago? i think they have generally been on fire all season. There was the Portsmouth game, i guess.


    I would vote for Torres, at the moment he looks like he's guaranteed to score in every game, and his effect on the flow of a game by his mere presence is a huge bonus for Liverpool and unsettling for the opposition.

    Liverpool are clearly much more dangerous with Torres than they were without him - although 4th is still the best they can hope for, because EVERY other team in the top half of the Prem has improved significantly just like Liverpool. Everton, Villa, and Arsenal being prime examples.

    That said, Tevez has also been excellent, and has shown that Man U simply don't need to play with an out and out striker at all, a bit like Barcelona. In fact, I would argue that that having that type of player in their lineup would have an adverse effect on their performances. When Saha plays, he is often more advanced than Rooney, Tevez, or Ronaldo typically are, but even he gets involved with their overall play much more than you would normally expect a striker to do. If they were to play such a striker, who and what would they sacrifice in order to make way for him? The team would inevitably be weakened.
  15. GranCanMan Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Location:
    Manchester
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    England
    An interesting point that. As a Utd follower I think we could possibly use a new striker but I see the point you're making.

    Sometimes we look blunt. As if we have too many chefs and not enough waiters delivering plates to tables, if you get the example.

    Rooney is not the finisher he needs to be and a player like Torres would certainly benefit from the service afforded him by Rooney, Tevez and Ronaldo.

    However, we ditched Van Nistelrooy for a reason. Maybe the deep-lying striker system is one that Fergie had in mind, like Barceloa did. But then, Rooney is not as good a finisher as Eto'o is......
  16. ranny fash New Member

    Member Since:
    May 18, 2005
    Location:
    notts
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC
    yeah what's up with Rooney's finishing at the moment? he has one of the best shots i've ever seen but seems to fluff it in front of goal this season - bizzarre considering some of the awesome strikes he has hit in previous seasons.

    having said that i've never felt goalscoring is one of Rooney's main strengths as a player. although a player of his talent could [and perhaps should] easily bag 15-20 a season as a matter of principle.
  17. ranny fash New Member

    Member Since:
    May 18, 2005
    Location:
    notts
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC
    ......maybe not but Ronaldo, Rooney, Tevez, Giggs, Scholes, etc etc are as prolific as Eto'o, Ronaldinho, Messi, Deco etc etc are as a whole.

    I'm starting to think that the 'goalscorer' is soon going to become another one of those outdated, specialist positions that is only ever used by teams who have someone so devastatingly prolific [Torres, van Nistelrooy] that their talents cannot be ignored despite the fact they usually contribute little else to the team. Think how prolific players like Ronaldinho, Ronaldo, Lampard, Cahill all are despite the fact they are traditionally considered more midfield players than forwards. I reckon this is a pattern that will continue to evolve to the point where 'strikers' are commonly seen as unnecessary; perhaps within the next 6 or 7 years. Total football mate. Everyone else is 40 years behind the Dutch.

    In fact, Eto'o himself is far more than just a goalscorer.
  18. Grinners89 BigSoccer Supporter

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Country:
    Australia
    I remember a game 3 or 4 seasons ago (possibly vs Sevilla and Daniel Alves) he played as a LW where his primary role was to 'tag' Alves and limit his effectiveness and this is still one of the best games ive ever seen by him. This game showed me how much more he offered than just goalscoring. He is in the top 3 strikers in the world and even this season, with limited preparation and injuries, ACN etc, he has still bagged something like 12 goals in 12 games in La Liga and has played well in a few CL games.
  19. GranCanMan Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Location:
    Manchester
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    England
    I think your traditional "number 9 " is a devastating player if you can get your hands on one. Torres, Inzaghi, Owen and RVN are examples of these and are priceless to their teams. Players that seem to be more popular with sides these days are physcially powerful players like Adebayor, Drogba, Berbatov, Toni etc. Players who aren't that quick, but can play up alone and still create real problems. We don't have these players though. Maybe a more evenly distirbuted spread of goals between Ronaldo, Rooney, Tevez, Nani etc is a better way forward for us. The one and only problem with a player like Torres at Liverpool and RVN at RM is, if you can stop that player, then you can make life very difficult for the team trying to score goals. We stopped Torres and after that there was little threat to our goal. Problem solved, from Utd's point of view.

    Just a theory.
  20. Grinners89 BigSoccer Supporter

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Country:
    Australia
    Hint: We had 10 men...I dont expect Torres to be able to beat 4 defenders on his own ;)
  21. Gandalf The Red BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 23, 2006
    true the way we approach games too hinders torres, when we play cautious Torres really is on his own.

    United didnt stop torres in the 3-0 win, they stopped his supply, gerrard was a spectator even before the sending off.
  22. Teso Dos Bichos 2004-2012

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    What is your excuse for the first game then?
  23. Gandalf The Red BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 23, 2006
    11 men camping on their 18 yard box should have anyones ass
  24. dazzamcc New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2008
    both different players. i would like Torres at United and i'm sure Liverpool fans would like Tevez at Anfield
  25. Grinners89 BigSoccer Supporter

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Country:
    Australia
    I would only like Tevez at Liverpool if we could have him with Torres...but i wouldnt want to replace Torres with Tevez

Share This Page