Pac 12 too competitive?

Discussion in 'College & Amateur Soccer' started by footie101, Mar 19, 2012.

  1. footie101 Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Location:
    California
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Country:
    United States
    It seems like every season there is at least a couple teams in the Pac 12 that should have got in to the tournament, but for one reason or another they were not chosen.

    For instance, Washington went 12-4-2 and didn't get in. SDSU also put together another 10 win season, but didn't make it. I guess when you're competing against teams like UCLA, Stanford, and UCSB it gets a little more difficult.

    I wouldn't argue that the level of competition & play in the Pac 12 is superior to the rest. I would argue that the level of competition is more spread out making it more difficult to qualify. The Huskies and Aztec's would maybe have a much better shot at qualifying in another conference.
          
  2. Sandon Mibut Member+

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2001
    Yeah, that's it.
  3. WatzBruin Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    I was going to call out LK on his comments in this article as SDSU did IMHO an abysmal job in scheduling last season. Scheduling the likes of low RPI teams in Manhatten, Houston Baptist, Long Island and Oral Roberts doesn't do much for building a compelling case for an invite. I also noticed that the Aztecs have two new coaches and have beefed up their 2012 schedule so maybe they realized the error of their ways.
  4. footie101 Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Location:
    California
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Country:
    United States

    I def agree that scheduling had a lot to do with it. Apparently SDSU is aware this, which is why they are playing ND, Indiana, Clemson, & Ohio State next season.

    Pac-12 coaches focused on impressing committee
  5. GauchoYoungin Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Location:
    805
    UCSB isn't in the Pac 6...they are in the Big West.
  6. footie101 Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Location:
    California
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Country:
    United States
    Touché...
  7. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    I agree about their schedule last year, but iirc, the previous two years they had a good case for a bid and weren't invited.
  8. bisbee Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Same about the Huskies schedule. The teams they beat had less than a .500 winning percentage. Their OOC schedule was a joke.
  9. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    They scheduled 9 non-conference games

    3 in-region (Portland, Gonzaga, Seattle), which they play for obvious reasons
    3 against NCAA qualifiers (beat #11 seed UAB, tied FGCU, had #6 SMU cancel due to weather)
    1 against traditionally strong Tulsa
    2 against weak teams in Loyola, IL and Houston Baptist

    If you consider that a joke, I can only imagine what you'd say about some of the other OOC schedules around. And obviously, most of Washington's schedule was played against other Pac-12 teams, which are always tough.
  10. WesternWillie Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    United States
    To say that Pac-12 teams are always tough wasn't true this past year. Other than UCLA and Washington the RPI's were low and deservedly so. Oregon State is rarely "tough". Cal was poor last year as was Stanford. San Diego State's schedule was abysmal and made it so that they couldn't make the dance unless they won conference. All of this conspired against Washington and made them a bubble team, and you know you don't want to be a bubble team in the west cause you will lose out to a bubble team in the east (ask UC Riverside) just about every time.
  11. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Tough is a relative term, I guess. They were certainly tough enough to travel cross-country and get a tie at Wake Forest, which made the tournament ahead of Washington.

    Yes, their schedule was abysmal, but this is irrelevant to the question of whether they were a tough opponent to beat (I'd say they were).

    As long as the Pac-12 is the runaway leader in producing pro talent, it'll be hard to deny that it's a tough league.
  12. bisbee Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    However, most of the pros have come from one program.
  13. bisbee Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    The issue isn't about other teams OOC schedules. It's about washington's and it left alot to be desired.
  14. WesternWillie Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    United States
    I was just pointing out that it was a down year for the conference. It will be tougher this year. You have got to figure that Stanford in particular will be much better. I am not sold on Cal but they should be better than last year. San Diego State is a good competitive side and I think Washington is on the rise. I still would pick UCLA as the champ but I doubt they will go undefeated again in conference and will have to replace a lot of offense that graduated or went pro.
  15. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Pretty sure the Pac-12 is #1 even if you ignore UCLA altogether.
  16. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    I can buy most of that, although it may be more a case of improved balance rather than strength. UCLA and Washington both lose a lot of talent.

    Also, with the Big West due to come back down after being spectacular last year, the Pac-12 will surely look better by comparison.
  17. Sandon Mibut Member+

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2001
    You didn't think I was gonna ignore this, did you? ;)

    In terms of current MLS players, the ACC, which has 9 soccer playing members, has 61 players on rosters as of today.

    The Pac-12, with 6 soccer playing members, has 50 players on MLS rosters, again, as of today. (29 of those 50 did not go to UCLA.)

    Obviously, 61 is greater than 50. Also, obviously, the average per school in the Pac-12 is much higher. As you'll see in the info below, the bottom of the ACC drags down their per-school average.

    Both conferences numbers are impacted by having several players abroad, from Brad Friedel, Carlos Bocanegra, Robbie Findley and Joe Corona, to Oguchi Onyewu, Maurice Edu, Bakary Soumare, Charlie Davies and Ale Bedoya. It's a slight edge to the ACC in terms of players abroad, but it's close.

    Code:
    Eddie Ababio		D	Colorado	North Carolina
    Korede Aiyegbusi	D	Kansas City	NC State
    Chris Albright		D	Philadelphia	Virginia (2)
    Jalil Anibaba		D	Chicago		North Carolina
    Cody Arnoux		F	Salt Lake	Wake Forest (3)
    Corey Ashe		D	Houston	North Carolina
    Darrius Barnes		D	New England	Duke
    Joe Bendik		GK	Portland	Clemson
    Corben Bone		M	Chicago		Wake Forest (3)
    Marc Burch		D	Seattle		Maryland
    Danny Califf		D	Philadelphia	Maryland (2)
    Brian Carroll		M	Philadelphia	Wake Forest (3)
    Adam Cristman		F	Los Angeles	Virginia
    Sam Cronin		M	San Jose	Wake Forest
    A.J. DeLaGarza		D	Los Angeles	Maryland
    Tyler Deric		GK	Houston	North Carolina (1)
    Alex Dixon		M	Houston	North Carolina (3)
    Michael Farfan		M	Philadelphia	North Carolina
    Hunter Freeman	D	Colorado	Virginia (3)
    Omar Gonzalez		D	Los Angeles	Maryland (3)
    Cole Grossman		M	Columbus	Duke
    Jeremy Hall		M	Toronto 	Maryland (3)
    Michael Harrington	D/M	Kansas City	North Carolina
    Chase Harrison		GK	Philadelphia	Virginia Tech
    Will Hesmer		GK	Columbus	Wake Forest
    Matt Hedges		D	Dallas		North Carolina
    Hunter Jumper		D	Chicago		Virginia
    Stephen Keel		D	New York	Wake Forest
    Stephen King		M	DC		Maryland
    Ross LaBauex		M	Colorado	Virginia
    Michael Lahoud		M	Chivas USA	Wake Forest
    Alex Lee		D	Dallas		Maryland	
    Zach Loyd		D	Dallas		North Carolina
    Zac MacMath		GK	Philadelphia	Maryland (3)
    Enzo Martinez		M	Salt Lake	North Carolina (3)
    Pablo Mastroeni	M	Colorado	NC State
    Stephen McCarthy	D	New England	North Carolina
    Dax McCarty		M	New York	North Carolina (2)
    Patrick Nyarko		M	Chicago		Virginia Tech (3)
    Ike Opara		D	San Jose	Wake Forest (3)
    Brian Ownby		M	Houston	Virginia
    Logan Pause		M	Chicago		North Carolina (3)
    Dane Richards		M	New York	Clemson
    James Riley		D	Chivas USA	Wake Forest
    Robbie Russell		D	DC		Duke
    Scott Sealy		F	Dallas		Wake Forest
    Chris Seitz		GK	Dallas		Maryland (2)
    Ben Speas		M	Columbus	North Carolina (3)
    Nathan Sturgis		M	Houston	Clemson (2)
    Tony Tchani		M	Columbus	Virginia (2)
    Wells Thompson	M	Colorado	Wake Forest
    Chris Tierney		D	New England	Virginia
    Casey Townsend	F	Chivas USA	Maryland
    Kirk Urso		M	Columbus	North Carolina
    Michael Videira		M	Chicago		Duke
    Rodney Wallace		D	Portland	Maryland (2)
    Andrew Wenger	?	Montreal	Duke (3)
    Ethan White		D	DC		Maryland (2)
    Jeremiah White		M	New England	Wake Forest
    Sheanon Williams	D	Philadelphia	North Carolina (1)
    Graham Zusi		M	Kansas City	Maryland
    NORTH CAROLINA – 16 (Ababio, Anibaba, Ashe, Deric, Dixon, Farfan, Harrington, Hedges, Loyd, Martinez, McCarthy, McCarty, Pause, Speas, Urso, Williams)
    MARYLAND – 13 (Burch, Califf, DeLaGarza, Gonzalez, Hall, King, Lee, MacMath, Seitz, Townsend, Wallace, E. White, Zusi)
    WAKE FOREST – 12 (Arnoux, Bone, Carroll, Cronin, Hesmer, Keel, Lahoud, Opara, Riley, Sealy, Thompson, J. White)
    VIRGINIA – 8 (Albright, Cristman, Freeman, Jumper, LaBauex, Tierney, Ownby, Tchani)
    DUKE – 5 (Barnes, Grossman, Russell, Videira, Wenger)
    CLEMSON – 3 (Bendik, Richards, Sturgis)
    NC STATE – 2 (Aiyegbusi, Mastroeni)
    VIRGINIA TECH – 2 (Harrison, Nyarko)
    BOSTON COLLEGE - 0

    Code:
    ABROAD
    Ryan Adeleye		D	Be’er Sheva (Israel)	North Carolina
    Reuben Ayarna		M	GAIS (Sweden)		Boston College (3)
    Shawn Barry		D	LASK Llinz (Austria)	Virginia (2)
    Alejandro Bedoya	M	Rangers (Scotland)	Boston College
    Charlie Davies		F	Sochaux (France)	Boston College
    Maurice Edu		M	Rangers (Scotland)	Maryland (3)
    Clarence Goodson	D	Brondby (Denmark)	Maryland (3)
    Stuart Holden		M	Bolton (England)	Clemson (2)
    Oguchi Onyewu		D	Sporting (Portugal)	Clemson (2)
    Michael Parkhurst	D	Nordsjaelland (Denmark) Wake Forest (3)
    Robbie Rogers		M	Leeds (England)		Maryland (1)
    Billy Schuler		F	Hammarby (Sweden)	North Carolina (3)
    Bakary Soumare	D	Karlsruhe (Germany)	Virginia (1)
    Brian Span		M	Djurgardens (Sweden)	Virginia (2)
    Paul Stalteri		D	Mochengladbach (Germany) Clemson (1)



    Code:
    PAC 12
    Chad Barrett		F	Los Angeles		UCLA (2)
    Steven Beitashor	D	San Jose		San Diego State	
    Tony Beltran		D	Salt Lake		UCLA (3)
    David Bingham		GK	San Jose		California (3)
    Calen Carr		F	Houston		California
    Servando Carrasco	M	Seattle			California
    Mike Chabala		D	Portland		Washington
    Todd Dunivant		D	Los Angeles		Stanford
    David Estrada		F	Seattle			UCLA
    Benny Feilhaber	M	New England		UCLA (2)
    Stefan Frei		GK	Toronto		California (3)
    Alan Gordon		F	San Jose		Oregon State
    Tally Hall		GK	Houston		San Diego State
    Ty Harden		D	Toronto		Washington
    Kevin Hartman		GK	Dallas			UCLA
    Jordan Harvey		D	Vancouver		UCLA
    Chandler Hoffman	F	Philadelphia		UCLA (3)
    Jacob Husted		M	San Jose		Washington
    Patrick Ianni		D	Seattle			UCLA (3)
    Andrew Jacobson	M	Dallas			California
    Hector Jimenez		M	Los Angeles		California
    George John		D	Dallas			Washington
    Ryan Johnson		F	Toronto		Oregon State
    Bryan Jordan		M	Los Angeles		Oregon State
    Eric Kronberg		GK	Kansas City		California
    Roger Levesque		F	Seattle			Stanford
    Chad Marshall		D	Columbus		Stanford (2)
    Ellis McLoughlin		F	San Jose		Washington (1)
    Danny Mwanga		F	Philadelphia		Oregon State (2)
    Chance Myers		D	Kansas City		UCLA (2)
    Kyle Nakazawa		M	Los Angeles		UCLA
    Amobi Okugo		M	Philadelphia		UCLA (1)
    Brian Perk		GK	Los Angeles		UCLA
    Steve Purdy		D	Portland		California
    Matt Reis		GK	New England		UCLA
    Brent Richards		F	Portland		Washington
    Nick Rimando		GK	Salt Lake		UCLA (3)
    Andy Rose		M	Seattle			UCLA
    Kelyn Rowe		M	New England		UCLA (2)
    Luke Sassano		M	Kansas City		California
    Josh Saunders		GK	Los Angeles		California
    Shawn Singh		D	Kansas City		UCLA
    Michael Stephens	M	Los Angeles		UCLA
    A.J. Soares		D	New England		California
    Pete Vagenas		M	Chivas USA		UCLA
    Tyson Wahl		D	Montreal		California
    Bobby Warshaw	M	Dallas			Stanford
    Andrew Wiedman	F	Dallas			California (3)
    Marvell Wynne		D	Colorado		UCLA (2)
    Sal Zizzo		M	Portland		UCLA (2)
    UCLA – 21 (Barrett, Beltran, Estrada, Feilhaber, Hartman, Harvey, Hoffman, Ianni, Myers, Nakazawa, Okugo, Perk, Reis, Rimando, Rose, Rowe, Singh, Stephens, Vagenas, Wynne, Zizzo)
    CALIFORNIA - 13 (Bingham, Carr, Carrasco, Frei, Jacobson, Jimenez, Kronberg, Purdy, Sassano, Saunders, Soares, Wahl, Wiedman)
    WASHINGTON - 6 (Chabala, Harden, Husted, John, McLoughlin, Richards)
    OREGON STATE - 4 (Gordan, Johnson, Jordan, Mwanga)
    STANFORD – 4 (Dunivant, Levesque, Marshall, Warshaw)
    SAN DIEGO STATE – 2 (Beitashor, Hall)

    Code:
    ABROAD
    Carlos Bocanegra	D	Rangers (Scotland)	UCLA (3)
    Jonathan Bornstein	D	UANL Tigers (Mexico)	UCLA
    Joe Corona		M	Tijuana Xolos		San Diego State (1)
    Robbie Findley		F	Nottingham (England)	Oregon State
    Brad Friedel		GK	Tottenham (England)	UCLA (3)
    Lep Krupnik		D	Mac. Netanya (Israel)	California
    Brad Rusin		D	Koge (Denmark)	UCLA
    Matt Taylor		F	Paderborn (Germany)	UCLA
  18. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Thanks! Must spread rep.
  19. bisbee Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    +1 :)
  20. midfieldmadness Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Of the schools Sandon listed, I'm most surprised to see California up there with the big boys with 13 MLSers. Apparently they're quietly producing a lot of pros. I knew they were doing well in that category recently, but didn't realize how well. Will be interested to see how they fare this year in the PAC with their whole squad returning and so much turnover at UCLA and others.
  21. WesternWillie Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Country:
    United States
    The whole squad from a 4 win season. They will be improved but I am picking them 5th in the PAC-12.
    1) UCLA
    2) Washington
    3) Stanford
    4) SDSU
    5) Cal
    6) Oregon State

    Anybody else?
  22. bisbee Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Why not...
    1) UCLA
    2)SDSU
    3)UW
    4)Stanford
    5)Cal
    6) OSU
  23. midfieldmadness Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Club:
    FC Barcelona

    I may be proven a fool, but it seems like the easiest prediction is OSU as 6th, I think the rest is really up in the air with so many moving parts from last year. I think the Pac-12 teams will be very competitive with one another this year (don't know how they'll stack up on the national stage). Also, I will say I saw Cal play on several occasions last year and they looked far better than there record. If they get it together, they'll be able to compete with anybody in the league. So, here goes my prediction (I have almost no confidence in my picks of 2-5 order):

    1) UCLA
    2) SDSU
    3) Cal
    4) Stanford
    5) UW
    6) OSU
  24. Hararea Member+

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    So far, all the picks have UCLA first and Oregon St. last. Here are my two predictions

    1. Oregon State won't finish last
    2. UCLA won't finish first

    This will be Steve Simmons' fourth year at Oregon State, so it's time for his program to step forward. He now has a full set of his own players, many of them very experienced, and he should also have one of the most talented players in the conference as long as Khiry Shelton gets healthy. I'm not saying they'll make the post-season, but they should be competitive.

    As for UCLA, I know they're never short on talent, but Andy Rose, Kelyn Rowe, and Chandler Hoffman were special college players and won't be easy to replace.

    Here's what each team is due to bring back from last year's all-conference. At least on the surface, Cal looks to be in good shape to rebound.

    Cal -
    1st team: Steve Birnbaum D Jr. California
    2nd team: Tony Salciccia MF Jr. California
    Hon Men: Seth Casiple (CAL, Fr., MF), John Fitzpatrick (CAL, Jr., F), Connor Hallisey (CAL, Fr., MF)

    Oregon St -
    1st team: Emery Welshman F Jr. Oregon State
    2nd team: Roberto Farfan MF Jr. Oregon State
    Hon Men: Chris Harms (OSU, RS Jr., D), Colin Mitchell (OSU, RS Jr., MF/F)

    San Diego St
    1st team: none
    2nd team: Jose Altamirano MF Jr. San Diego State, Miles Byass F So. San Diego State (or will he transfer?), Abraham Villon MF Jr. San Diego State
    Hon Men: Blake Hylen (SDSU, RS So., GK)

    UCLA -
    1st team: none
    2nd team: Ryan Hollingshead MF/F Jr. UCLA, Matt Wiet D Jr. UCLA
    Hon Men: Victor Munoz (UCLA, So., MF), Evan Raynr (UCLA, Jr., F/MF), Joe Sofia (UCLA, So., D), Victor Chavez (UCLA, So., F)

    Stanford -
    1st team: none
    2nd team: Adam Jahn F Jr. Stanford
    Hon Men: JJ Koval (STAN, So., MF)

    Washington -
    1st team: none
    2nd team: Spencer Richey GK So. Washington, Dylan Tucker-Gangnes MF Jr. Washington
    Hon Men: Ben Fisk (WASH, Jr., MF)
  25. scoachd1 Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Location:
    Southern California
    Great information. Would you happen to have information on tournament bids and seedings over the past 10 years as well? It would be interesting to see how all those professional players in each league translated into tournament bids.

Share This Page