I don't think we've had an article from The Blaze today yet, have we? I mean, he's hit the Op-Ed page of the WSJ and The Heritage Foundation. That can't be far, right?
Where will the federal government get that money to cover the costs in the first three years? Borrow it when it is in debt to the tune of 16 trillion. Borrow it? Plus, the federal government promise to pay the first three years! Is just that a promise. President Obama's administration doesn't have a good track record on promises. 1. Halve the debt by his first term ends. 2. If the stimulus is passed unemployment will not go over eight percent. 3. Dream Act will be passed. 4. Unemployment will be 5.1 percent by July 2012. Need I go on? It says between 2014 and 2023 the Federal Government will pay 931 billion dollars of the cost. Where will the almost one trillion dollars come from?
Well, he has posted The Moonie Times more than once. I can see how The Blaze struggles to get off the bench with that line up.
well, everyone knows they are very aggressive creatures. Have you not watched all the documentaries on History and TLC?
Why isn't this on that website? Heritage Rewrites History The think tank proposed the individual mandate years before Clinton took office. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204369404577211161144786448.html
Really? Well, it's not like he's been unpredictable. Astonishing(ly dense) at times, but consistently predictable.
Ah, yes, you have him on ignore, so me quoting doesn't help. It wasn't the 17 million uninsured, but his response was his standard "Er mer gerd! Der dufersut!"
So why don't I hear anything when it comes to where the Federal government will come up with 931 billion dollars to pay for Obamacare the first three years?
My wife is a doctor - I spend quite a bit of time around doctors. I can't remember the last time I heard one worry a bit about the ACA.
They must be in the minority. I have a family member who is a doctor as well - he doesn't like it one bit. Does your wife see Medicaid patients?
She's a resident, so she ends up seeing all kinds of patients depending on the rotation. She's in Kentucky, so it's underserved generally, but also home of some of the nuttiest of the right wingers.
So if she is a resident - she doesn't have a practice. Probably isn't too concerned yet. If she goes into her own practice she will be concerned. If she works for a hospital - she probably won't worry about it. She will let the hospital administrators worry about it.
Yet again, because people are tired of bouncing links off your empty head. But, I'm a glutton, so suck on this: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...21xx/doc12119/03-30-healthcarelegislation.pdf I've bolded the answer to your next question.
Hmmmm. This will be tougher. I'm guessing {Show Ignored Content} will respond with anecdotes AND will move the goalposts. No: he will post a right-leaning link that purports to prove that the CBO is wrong.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/taxes-going-pay-pay-obamacare-145413745.html Is this a synopsis of how it will be paid for. Do me a favor - go through the 35 page mumbo jumbo and tell me exactly what page it talks about how it will be paid for. I don't think I linked a 35 page document. Yahoo - is that liberal enough? Didn't President Obama say it was bad to raise taxes on anyone during a recession (which we will be facing if the Bush tax cuts aren't extended for everyone, defense cuts put back into place, payroll tax holiday extended).
This may actually come as a shocker, but he actually linked to an article that answers his question. Apparently getting the 35-page CBO report linked was too much of a burden for his lazy ass, so he did his own google search. I know.. I know.. Proof that miracles do happen.