Obama Failure Thread Part V

You asked for links to one of my posts - I showed you links and then nothing.

That shows you really don't want to debate. Especially the facts.

 

Or the Heritage Foundation.

 

Just don't look behind you:

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/3...ustration-at-fema-other-agencies-during-town/

Victims of Hurricane Sandy unhappy with Obama.

An Obama failure.

 

No response from anyone.

I wonder why these people voted for President Obama.

An Obama failure.

 

Maybe because they found a candidate they believed in?

I wonder why the people who hung Obama in effigy voted for Romney.

Any response to that?

 

If this is a serious question and you can do something about it (and the fact that a thread somewhere in Customer Service didn't get any attention means probably no), here is what is wrong with ignore:

1) the fact that <ignored users> posts don't leave any trace (except for a general button that somewhere there are ignore useres posts) makes it look like a post directly replying to the previous post is instead replying to the post pefore that.

2) When someone quotes an ignored user, that is missing and it looks like either they are replying to the post before theirs, or they are like a deranged person talking to themselves.

A few posts per page by an ignored user makes reading a page slightly strange. A lot on a page (as in this thread), make this seem like a funny farm (maybe that's what it is).


A solution would be to leave a stub per post (or quoted post) that just says <ignored user stuff> or something, which would still leave the page a little strange, but at lease people would have an ide what is going on.

As it is, the "feature" just sucks.


...sorry for the rant.

 

I don't think he can hear you. Maybe you should wait until he's spinning some pottery.

 

Hell, any of us who post here are guilty of this.

 

luft, we had a Patrick Swayze marathon for Thanksgiving. When the girls chose a film, Dirty Dancing crushed Ghost. Another Obama failure.

 

This thread is Exhibit A for why the new and improved Ignore blows.

 

The only way ignore works in it's current form is if everyone has the same person on ignore.

So I need all of you to put dapip on ignore

 

Should people who voted for Obama expect something in return.

People voted for Romney because of the failed policies of President Obama.

 

I'm sure the failed policies were at the front of this person's mind.


Same with this witty fellow!

If you're going to say that black people only voted for Obama because Obama is black, are you going to say that there are white people who only voted for Romney because Romney is white?

 

Unemployment rate drops to lowest in four years


http://www.nbcnews.com/business/economywatch/unemployment-rate-drops-lowest-four-years-1C7488578

An Obama Failure.

B/T/W Fox News is still not reporting it. Rove must still be on the phone with some imaginary counties not yet reporting job info.

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/12/07/nov-jobs-report/1751705/

As the article states - the unemployment number went down due to 350,000 people leaving the workforce.
Not getting jobs.

An Obama failure.

Forgot that part didn't you.

September and October gains revised DOWNWARD.

 

Unfortunately I think there is some truth to what you say.

You never answered the question.should the Detroit councilwoman expect quid pro quo for voting for President Obama?

 

that article is from November 30th.

A Schapes failure.

 

That would be an Obama success, but don't let that stop your idiotic rants.

 

So it makes a difference what day the article is from 6 days ago?

Mad I showed your article about unemployment was wrong (in terms of showing the unemployment rate went down because people left the work force).

 

It is a success that a Detroit councilwoman thinks President Obama should pay back Detroit for voting for him?

 

An article from 8 days ago, and about FEMA shows that you are in no position to sit at the adult table.

 

Hey, we are all getting free phones.

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/12/07/nov-jobs-report/1751705/

Unemployment goes down because the participation number loses 350,000. Not because people are getting jobs.

September and October gains revised downward.

 

You misrepresent the facts. You lose your seat at the adult table.