Libertarian Fail

When people don't want to claim the credit with an invention, you know there are problems with it...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/06/dorian-s-nakamoto_n_4915379.html

 

Super slight progress is still progress, so good for him.

Now there's a low bar.
Good for hi
m. Extremely slight progress is still progress.
Good for him. Extremely slight progress is still progress.
Good for him. Extremely slight progress is still progress.

 

If you're the kind of person who thinks strict libertarianism is absurd in the modern world, you'll laugh like hell at this story.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/shouts/2014/03/libertarian-police-department.html

enjoy

 

What about the mockery? How does the mockery taste?

 

I made it precisely one sentence. Why does the New Yorker allow 12-year-old brats to write for their magazine?

 

Wingnuts are winning there..

 

So how'd that work out for the marxists again?

Yeah, thought so...

 

Well, they had the small problem of a bunch of their ideological companions outright murdering millions.

 

Suharto, Pinochet, dozens more, you know the drill. Nobody's hands are clean. Maybe the Greens. Probably not, though.

Anyway, my point stands - extremists of all types think Matt's post is about them.

 

Suharto was Libertarian? Do words just not have meaning?

The "Chicago Boys" slander is just that. Pinochet was never an adherent to the NAP.

Also interesting that you call Gandhi an extremist.

 

The same reason you read at the level of a 6 year old, I guess.

 

Libertarians (or at least Anti-Federalists) are winning this one (so far)..

http://www.latimes.com/nation/natio...er-blm-20140412,0,1159016.story#axzz2yrwpdeQh