Future Warfare

Discussion in 'Military Equipment, Service and Technology' started by Scarecrow, Aug 11, 2007.

  1. Scarecrow Red Card

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Check out the video of this system. Unmanned, not sure what that stinger missile is, but the javelin is also a shoulder fired, fire and forget missile.
          
  2. daisrael Red Card

    Member Since:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    Dayton
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Country:
    United States
    That is impressive. The systems the US comes up with are incredible.
  3. CrewDust Member

    Member Since:
    May 6, 1999
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Country:
    United States
    We're still the best toy maker.
  4. spejic Cautionary example

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Location:
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    I just wonder who this weapon system was supposed to fight? The airburst rockets, the gatling gun, and the guided missiles are all for fights out in the open against targets worth spending $75000 (the cost of a Javelin missile) to destroy.

    I've long been a fan of wheeled armored vehicles, however.
  5. spejic Cautionary example

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Location:
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
  6. Dirt McGirt Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Club:
    Seattle Sounders
    Country:
    United States
    We need to think about low intensity urban warfare for the present and future of our armed forces. Better weapons, body armor and communications at the squad level are the most important imo.
  7. Scarecrow Red Card

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Agreed. Small squad interdiction units, with serious firepower and strong armor that can move fast. I would like to see some sort of battle suit come into play that works like an exoskeleton. Of course power sources and light weight, yet durable armor are 2 major obstacles to that happening.
  8. spejic Cautionary example

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Location:
    San Rafael, CA
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    The problem is that such things are 1) not sexy and 2) kinda cheap. For example, one useful system would be something that can take out a third-world cinder block house without taking out the next three houses. Something like a 105mm cannon on a LAV or Stryker (both of which have been prototyped) with the right kind of shell. But if you have one of those, then you need one less big, loud, expensive M-1. How would the military industrial complex or procurement or Congress ever be in favor of that trade?
  9. mak9 Member

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2005
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Club:
    Real Madrid
  10. ajaxpsv New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Location:
    L.A.
    Club:
    PSV Eindhoven
    Country:
    Netherlands
  11. Mr. Conspiracy Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Country:
    United States

Share This Page