1. I fully understand you don't think we could have gotten anything, I just disagree with you. Once again I'm not saying we would have gotten much but something is better than nothing. The whole point of what I'm talking about about the something being better than nothing, is than when you get in situations like this you have something to package, the proverbial bag of balls. The problem for us in packaging things with Duka is we don't have many bags of balls. 2. We didn't even have to do this, there was no bluff that really needed to be held to or called at this point. We didn't have to waive Cole, we could have kept his rights just like we did Balchan. I know you like that we're willing to be nice guys, but nice guys don't get full value for their assets. I don't see the point in giving assets away just because a player doesn't like our coach. I don't find giving pieces to other teams to be a great course of action in professional sports. 3. I understand that you think Cole Grossman was a dime a dozen player. In my mind he was a useful practice player and a spot starter that didn't take up an international spot. Those types of players have use in MLS, they aren't worthless nor are they dime a dozen. Put another way we're at 22 right now, after the draft, are you really that confident that the thirtieth man on our roster is going to be better than Cole Grossman? I'm not.