Conference Finals N.E. v FIRE, Sun 11/6 [R]

Discussion in 'Chicago Fire' started by JeffGMc, Oct 31, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. stringcheese New Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Location:
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Shhhhhhhhhhhh. You're not doing youself any favors here.
    You are wrong and apparently too stupid to realize it
          
  2. futbolfirefan New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Location:
    Chicago
    [IMG]

    When the ball was passed. the line is parallel to the center line. Yea the quality sucks but hey, its mlsnet.coms fault
  3. Pablo Chicago Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sweet Home Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Gee I hope that 220 lb. Reis is okay after slightly glancing that 120 lb. thug Thiago. What a crock!
  4. Pablo Chicago Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sweet Home Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Great post. There was definately more daylight between Joseph and the Fire defenders than there was between Segarus and NE's defenders.
  5. Beau Dure Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2000
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    Yeah, it was an interesting coincidence that tonight's Family Guy made prominent mention of the Emmys.
  6. Gunners11 Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
  7. fireman451 Moderator

    Member Since:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    NE got lucky, they escaped with one tonight. I thought the coaching by SN was horrible. To play prevent defense almost/should've cost them their lead. doesn't mean they couldn't have won, but it would be a challenge after playing 45 minutes of prevent. I think the offside call was incorrect due to Sega getting behind the defender before he played the ball.

    Overall, we had a good run in the playoffs for having such a mediocre season. NE got lucky and I think they know it. How many attempts did they get after the 4th minute? Kind of reminded me of MLS Cup 2000, when we outshot and out hustled KC but couldn't get one past fatty or the posts. It happens people.

    NE looked like a team bunkering the entire second half. I really don't want LA to win the cup, but I don't hold much hope for NE to do any damage given their lack of attack. They had a strong attack the first half of the season, but after all the WCQ and the all star weekend, NE has been way off their early season agressive play.

    Well, back to Bears football and looking to see how we can shake some of the crap and financial burden on our roster (talking to you Tony S. and Thorrington).

    Finally, I would like to take this last paragraph to give a big thank you to CJ Brown this playoff season. Real glad to see our man Brown have a good playoff run.
  8. Chicago1871 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 21, 2001
    Location:
    The City
    Watched the replay of the dissallowed goal again. He's off, but Jesus is that a late flag.
  9. Ombak Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    His post shows Joseph passing the ball and Dempsey in an onside position (the ball is closer to the goal-line than he is).

    How can you even guess at whether Joseph was offside?
  10. Ombak Moderator

    Member Since:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    It's funny though. It's making my visit more fun.
  11. brandnew_de New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2005
    Location:
    CT
    I think the flag went up late because the linesmen was waiting to see if Reis could collect it. If he's offside and doesn't touch it, play is supposed to continue. I think...
  12. Bluto11 The sky is falling!

    Member Since:
    May 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    just watched a highlight of the disallowed goal, he was offside. :(
  13. USSF REF Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Country:
    United States
    The laws of the game actually state:

    It is not an offence in itself to be in an offside position.
    A player is in an offside position if:
    • he is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the
    second last opponent

    A player is not in an offside position if:
    • he is in his own half of the field of play or
    • he is level with the second last opponent or
    • he is level with the last two opponents

    Offence
    A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the
    ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of
    the referee, involved in active play by:
    • interfering with play or
    • interfering with an opponent or
    • gaining an advantage by being in that position

    No Offence
    There is no offside offence if a player receives the ball directly from:
    • a goal kick or
    • a throw-in or
    • a corner kick

    Infringements/Sanctions
    For any offside offence, the referee awards an indirect free kick to the
    opposing team to be taken from the place where the infringement
    occurred. * (see page 3)

    The way this is actually enforced goes like this.

    At the time the ball is touched by a teammate of the attacker the AR takes a "snapshot" of all players who are in the offisde position. Those players remain in an offside position until a teammate touches the ball, a defender deliberately posses and plays the ball or the ball goes out of play. Then if at anytime after that the player in an offside position is...
    • interfering with play or
    • interfering with an opponent or
    • gaining an advantage by being in that position
    He is deemed to have violated law XI. It makes no difference if the player is involved one minute later or one second later. The player started in an offside position and cannot do any of those 3 things at anytime during this phase of play or else he will be sanctioned. He must first reestablish himself as onside if he wants to get involved in play.

    Another example of this violation is... Player A1 is in an offside position 10 yards onto his opponents half. The nearest defender B7 (ex. GK) is 25 yards from his opponent goal line on a corner. The ball is then cleared by the player A2. Player A1 runs back 5 yards onto his own half to collect the ball, but was in the offside position at the time the ball was played. The fact that A1 has come back onto his own half to collect this ball doesn't matter he is still punished for violating law XI.

    If you're still confused read this:

    http://dps.twiihosting.net/USSF/doc/content/doc_6_391.ppt
  14. macheath New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    DC

    Not offside. ESPN ran a replay of the goal from above and behind the goal, and you can clearly see that Dempsey is behind the ball when Joseph plays it. The Patriots football lines are on the field, and it makes it very obvious.
  15. macheath New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    DC
    This is a new mechanic that FIFA and USSF are making refs use, and it causes a lot of problems. Segares is in an offside position when the ball is played forward, and he moves to the ball. Previously, the flag would have gone up then, before Segares' shot. But we are now instructed to hold the flag until there's a movement by the defender, or an actual play on the ball by the offside attacker. When Segares makes his shot, he is not in an offside position, but since there was no other intervening play of the ball, he's still offside (he can't put himself back onside). And since the flag doesn't go up until Segares shoots, it looks like the AR is calling him offside at the time of the shot.

    But he isn't. The call (a tough, but correct one) is based on when the ball is played by the Fire teammate, and Segares is in an offside position at that moment. The new mechanic with holding the flag comes into play, making this situation more difficult and contentious than it needed to be. So the call is based on Segares' position when the ball is played by his teammate, but the delayed flag is because of this new mechanic. The AR was following the book--the problem lies with FIFA and USSF.
  16. Milolaz New Member

    Member Since:
    May 11, 2005
    F-it, see you all in Bridgeview and around here till then.
  17. Mike Marshall Member+

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2000
    Location:
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Country:
    United States
    FWIW, I didn't see it on the broadcast, but at the game, it was pretty clear that Herron pushed the AR at least once, and put his hands on him at least one other time. After Herron pushed the AR, Vaughn sprinted over to that sideline and pulled out the red pretty quickly.
  18. dsheon New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 12, 2000
    This is an excellent post, but I'll add that the problem's not necessarily just with FIFA and USSF. If more fans and perhaps players were better aware of this, then they wouldn't be so quick to jump at the refs - maybe.
  19. lufty Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 2000

    had he not touched the ball it would of been rules ok no?
  20. Scarecrow Red Card

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Just watched the replay again on SC and he was off. Regardless of when the AR puts the flag up, the correct call was made and that is what matters most. Looked to me like Herron pushed the AR, a big no no, and I saw Zach with his left, couldn't tell who it was at, but he was already being pulled away when he threw the punch.
  21. ManiacalClown Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    I hope the league suspends Herron for at least half a season. Seriously.
  22. Wolves1935 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Location:
    Prospect Heights
    Just out of curiosity, what's spitting on an opponent worth then?
  23. dabes2 Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 1, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    Being suspended for MLS cup, but league management doesn't have the balls.
  24. REMOVED New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2004
    The boys played their hearts out and left everything on the field. Kudos to the "old-timers" (Curtin, CJ, Thorton) and to our crop of youngsters. They played a very positive game (unlike NE). In FIFA's last globl report, they called for more respect for the referees. After last nights debacle, its hard to accept this. The linesmen are RUINING the MLS and football in general. Twice in 3 games a last minute dramatic goal is called off! The linesman MUST be eliminated from off-sides rulings-it is the only way to save this beautiful game. None of the NE players gestured for the off-sides! (While the Fire players gestured for the offsides for the first goal.) Both goals should have counted. These refs clearly vioilated the letter and spirit of the recent FIFA rule changes. Did we really gain any advantage on the play? Segares was 40 yards from the ball when it was struck and ran 35 yards to score. In the last FIFA report Cruyff suggests that refs should think and act more like players- I think this would help our league and the beautiful game. FIFA wants to dramatically reduce the number of refs. We can start with last nights crew. In the meantime, our game is,sadly, in decline thanks to the men in black.
  25. REMOVED New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2004
    I hope the league suspends that linesman for being an anti-soccer jackass.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page