1. You Want me to disregard the Gold Cup because of Chepo? Fair enough. Yet you want to use CR to support your argument, you can't have it both ways. Even if we do count CR, his track record of doing well includes the powerhouses of NZ and CR. Great. When he disappears for the umpteenth time against Cameroon, Brazil, and Croatia, I won't be the only one saying this. 2. If you think that his play is best summarized by 'hasta ahi cumplio' then I disagree. 3. Yes, the Toulon tournament was his peak but he also played very well in the other tourneys. It has to be said that the level of competition and intensity was a lot higher in the olympics. 4 his supporting cast at Pachuca was horrendous yet he played well. Did you even watch his games? Are you looking at stats and coming to conclusions? 5. Yes, Vela is very talented. However, putting Gullit in that echelon is very premature and I'm sure many users here will agree.
1. You are the one who wants to have it both ways, you started this argument critizising Gullit of the same things we can critizise herrera for (which of course you ignore). Basically i think saying gullit is not half the player herrera is, is ridiculous 2. During the Olympics? of course, saying he was very good is overrating what he did in the olympics 4. Yes, i watched his games i remember he played excellent against santos, cruz azul, atlante and against others but he also had horrible games 5. I said they are 2 of mexico's mos talented, not putting him in the same tier. I dont even put Gio on the level of Vela, but thats just me
*spits in your face* Only Mexican team left in the greatest tournament of the western hemisphere laughs at you
IMO poor attendance, what's wrong with those hinchas? tonight is when santos need their people rooting.