I don't know if Kane was injured but he'd have done better to have kept him on than bringing Soldado on. How much did that fella cost them? £25m? £30M
British Pathe uploaded some cool old vids, all way before my time. https://m.youtube.com/user/britishpathe/search?query=chelsea
Well, that comes back to what I was saying about Sherwood, doesn't it. http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/apr/18/tim-sherwood-tottenham-hotspur I thought about this when I saw this picture after Bale scored that goal against Barca... Two ex-sperz players. It rather makes you wonder how well Liverpool would be doing in a year or so's time if they sold Suarez and maybe young Sterling to a 'big' team. That's the point, it comes down to players at the end of the day. You can't put out TWO teams on the pitch.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...is-close-extending-Chelsea-contract-2018.html No quotes adn I know its the Mail but I want to believe nonetheless.
This would be great news. On another note, whoever does the captions for the pictures clearly didn't do their research. They mistook Tiago for Arda Turan (4th picture down). They don't look anything alike!
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27133571 FA charges Jose, Faria and Ramires I suspect Ram will get done for four games so that ends his Domestic season and probably the first couple for next season
How can the FA have a case for "sarcastic" comments? I am surprised they are even thinking of charging. But then, I am not. And I really am fed up of Ramires. His IQ shrinks with every game.
the FA will make a case against Jose I am glad he spoke his mind and while he has said a few things this season I do not agree with I think he has every right to express his opinion as for Ramires- I mentioned this in another thread but I think he is frustrated with the role he is currently playing and the results which have come from that role. Going to be interesting to see how he does moving forward under Jose.
I just don't how you can legally prove a sarcastic comment but then I am not a lawyer. Re Ramires: I don't think he is starter material anymore. He will thrive in a 4-3-3 and we do play that when we are on the ropes sometimes. He may be ok in a front 3 in a 4-2-3-1. I love his energy but his woeful passing and first touch just doesn't cut it anymore. And I remember I was one of his biggest defenders in his first season.
thankfully with the reputation Jose has the FA has to prove very little. Much like they took upon themselves to charge JT after he was found not guilty in the criminal proceedings over the Anton Ferdinand incident. as for Ramires I think he is best used in a box to box role and that would require a change of formation/tactics and I do not see that happening any time soon. Perhaps a second season under Jose will do him some good.
just love the rags- Jose is trying to get sacked from us so he can take the United job so according to the media- Jose who was the epitome of anti-football last night should be the primary candidate for arguably the most prestigious job in English football....
LOL seriously. Why would he want to go to that train wreck? To manage the highly talented Cleverly, Young and Fellaini?
If you look very carefully at the 52 second mark, in the foreground you'll see a young Naughtius Maximus smoking a cigarette on the pitch.
After considering the remarks, the FA alleges that his comments call into question the integrity of Dean and/or Riley and/or bring the game into disrepute. yet SAF could basically say what he wanted to about the refs before and after many games typical FA- clueless tossers
Was going to bring this up. So a red shirt coulddo and say as he pleases and do what he wants. Yeah, sound judicial system. FA should stand for Fecking Absent.
going to be interested to see if Jose gets a fine/ban from this and the potential legal proceedings thereafter they may have opened a can of worms here