Tracks back, goes past players,good passer, why we keep selling our talented youngsters and keep giving Valencia Young and even Giggs (he is legend but should have made way for young talent way ago) Fletcher chances (he is done at this level like it or not) before that play Park in midfield but not a young midfielder Selling Fabio was just stupid, plays LB RB if not a starter that is a good cover player.
Ole will have to dispose of quite a few rubbish players and bring in some quality. If he isn't fired once the season ends, that is.
Caulker is trash. How was he even invited to a NT camp. The fact that Stoke can't win also is just ....smh
Q. If Tony Pulis had been in charge of Crystal Palace for the entire season would they be above us in the league?
Look - I shared the analysis. If people want to dispute it mathematically - great. I am in. If they want to post semantic arguments - to me its boring.
well once upon a time Jitty wouldn't even give the numbers behind his statements so don't expect too much of him too soon
No - but you forget - i linked an analytical refutation of Johno's scheduling argument. If people want to discuss the maths - great. But it seems strange to have the argument without using any numbers Remember also that Arsenal played Utd in the "easy schedule" of Chelsea Liverpool Dortmund Utd, Without collapsing in the league
I know this is what we need but I just naturally find myself rooting against them while watching. Eventful half of football.
I didn't post "semantic" arguments, I posted very obvious mathematical ones. You're shit on the road against top sides, and the math backs that up. I'm not sure what other "maths" are necessary for that analysis. How about the goal differential on the road against the top 5 + United: it's -17 over 5 games. Most of those games were in the second half of the season, but you performance in these games early in the season was poor also. It's funny that the argument is "boring" to you, when you have no ability to refute it.