Agreed. But I would think those are usually the best players. I don't recall the players exactly, but in the last few years I recall a club being relegated and was surprised at the number and quality of the players who stuck with the club. Was it BMG or FCN or Koeln or someone in the last 5 years who did that. We may see exactly this in action if HSV don't start pulling it out soon.
Gundogan will be earning 4m per year instead of 2.5m he was making before the new contract. Heard this on a BVB fan site - can someone confirm?
If footyfan is right in saying that inurance covers most of his salary while injured...would still you say the same?
At any normal workplace, workers compensation benefits usually equal at least 60% of your salary; this assessment is correct. Regardless of who covers his sick leave though, if this quote is correct, it does point to the fact that BVB expect him to make his recovery and regain form, with extra salary an incentive to get him back up to speed. Sounds very promising, hope Reus and Hummels get their significant raises too.
When you get sick in Germany the employer continues to pay your full salary for another 6 weeks, afterwards the insurance company covers up to € 8k a month (give or take). That was also the reason why Breno got into financial trouble after his two severe long-term knee injuries. He couldn't handle his expenses at 8k /month. As as long as Gündogan doesn't make a comeback, there's no reason for BVB to complain about his increased wages. After all they haven't been paying him since October anyway and as soon as he makes his comeback he's easily worth that amount.
Well, I can only speak from my experience and what I know from following 1860 all these years. We had several players on our rosters from 2003-1010 who had long-term injuries (several never came back: Schroth, Agostino, Cerny, Schwarz, etc.) who never came back. The club was out some money for them...as I recall it was a percentage of their salary but I don't recall how much. I am not sure, but I don't think insurance pays for a salary increase given to an injured player, but I don't know for certain. To be honest, I don't think I have ever heard of a club giving a player with a long-term injury a pay raise and a new contract.
Naw, we were part of the original settlement in 1009 that built a fussballpark along the Isar. 900 years later Bayern built theirs. The rest is history.
Klopp said Gundogan can even be fit for the World Cup and Bild says he will start training again on Monday. That gives us hope he will at least be back for the next season from the very beginning.
This. Not the first time we heard talk like this only to be followed by absolutely no sign of Gündogan's return at all.
Löw would be mental to take two CM's to Brazil who haven't played a single minute of football in 2014. At most it's Khedira or Gündogan.
Klopp said no such thing. Here is what Klopp said as presented by RN. Translated by me and I tried to add so people can understand the context of Klopp's words. It is the same f#cking game they've been playing when it comes to Gundogan.. Klopp on Gündogan: “Everything is better, but still not perfect. The stress of the highest levels requires perfect working order. He can use his situation to improve his training levels. Nothing has changed much. Things are just taking an unusually long time. When (In this case "when" can mean "if" in the context Klopp used it) he can (complete/do) normal training this season, others have to decide if this is good enough for a World Cup (place). Maybe there is a such thing as (great) early form which (would make him) useful for the World Cup. This would be desirable, but I cannot make a statement on it.”
Gündoğan is the substantially better player, providing similar box-to-box mobility with better technique and vision at the expense of physicality. If both's fitness levels are similar, its a no-brainer. Obviously its not, and I think if Löw truly has the long-term interests of his team at heart, he'll allow Gündoğan as much time as needed for him to recover 110% rather than try and push the envelope for the WC. Its a difficult choice, because I really like Durm and I think he's already better than Schmelzer in a lot of ways (smarter and more three-dimensional in attack, yet more conservative and positionally sound on defence) but I don't really want to just hand Durm the job based on a half-season of work, which is essentially what'd happen if we sell Schmelzer. Schmelzer, as much as we like to rag on him, reliably provides what he provides and is experienced, and there are worse options. Unless Liverpool are offering silly money (10 mil euros or more), I'd reluctantly turn them down and throw the gates open-season competition on LB between Schmelzer and Durm. If Schmelzer loses and is unwilling to become a rotational option, I'd look into selling him.
Luis Enrique and Cissokho are the two names I've heard for Liverpool at LB. Could be wrong there. EDIT: And Bazi, I'm sorry for bugging you about the avatar. Wear whichever avatar you feel most comfortable with, regardless of whether it has Hoeneß or not.