Obama Failure Thread Part V

Did you ever catagorically deny creating Schapes as a sock? I know you said you have him on ignore, but I figure as a Catholic, you're into paradoxes, the sort of "Can God create a stone so heavy He cannot lift it?" sort of thing.

That is, can Stanger create a sock so freakin' annoying, even He has to put it on ignore? Or did you/will you flat out deny being schapes' creator?

 

This looks delicious. But I'm still not going to hit the "Show Ignored Content" button.

 

dude, he's calling you out. I can't believe you're letting him get away with....

Nah. Can't do it. Just cracked up and called too much attention to myself. Last thing I need is a visit to/from HR...

 

You mean a treaty that would have no power to alter or overrule US law?

SOUND THE ALARM! THE BLUE HELMETS ARE INVADING! THE NRA WAS RIGHT! THE EVIL SOCIALIST FACIST MUSLIM IS INSTITUTING ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!

 

I can't program that well.

 

FYP: You needed black helicopters and more exclamation points.

 

Few people can. That's still not a categorical "Schapes is NOT by Sockpuppet" denial, though. You could've had assistance.

 

Are you being serious or not? Should I be heading for my safe room?

 

I assume it would go something like this



PS -- that is always an appropriate reply to Schapes

 

(I haven't gotten the memo yet from headquarters. They'll tell us when it's going down. BTW, I just finished my training to be a FEMA Koncentration Kamp Kommandant. How's your weapons training progressing? Mastering those DHS hollowpoint bullets yet?)

 

Well, if we all agree to click "Show Ignored Content" I think the answer will be yes, at least in cyber-terms.

 

Still no responses?

 

Just like Democrats/Liberals - don't want to address facts.

An Obama failure.

 

Still no response to why the only cuts the GOP will say they'll make are NPR and Planned Parenthood? Still no response to the heads of Fox "News" trying to bankroll Petraeus' presidency run?

I responded to your post; you just didn't like what I said.

Another Schapes fail.

 

Frothy Santorum was active against this...Why?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/opinion/collins-santorum-strikes-again.html?hp&_r=0

'...Santorum was upset about a section on children with disabilities that said: “The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.”
“This is a direct assault on us and our family!” he said at a press conference in Washington.

The theory about the treaty on the disabled is that the bit about “best interests of the child” could be translated into laws prohibiting disabled children from being home-schooled. At his press conference, Santorum acknowledged that wasn’t in the cards. But he theorized that someone might use the treaty in a lawsuit “and through the court system begin to deny parents the right to raise their children in conformity with what they believe.”'

It might be used to usurp faith based parents rights to do as they will with their property. (offspring)

What do you think the odds are that Santorum has a woodshed and a razor strop?

 

It's a slippery slope. One day we're passing a UN treaty on the rights of the disabled, and the next we're passing a UN treaty on the rights of stillborn babies.

 

What does "by sockpuppet" mean?

 

Republicans and President Obama should get together and work this out.
Where are the list of The President's cuts?

President Obama needs to meet with John Boehner and they need to work it out.

In terms of Petreus running for President - the head of Fox News could try and get him to run. He wouldn't have beaten Romney.

 

http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwrel&v=WFP-2_iDYMU

16 trillion dollars visually the amount of US debt.

An Obama failure.

 

A sock that goes both ways?

 

That would be bi sockpuppet.