And when it restarted for a 5th time I decided doing the work was a better use of my time than throwing something at the TV. Of course the Stanley Cup is at a commercial...
In case you were were "wandering," that would be "Gorton," not "Gordon," but communication is more important than spelling, and, you are right, that is quite the soupy mess. It's raining clam chowder.
Cable CSR: The game is on 702 Me: No it's not, that's England/Belgium, I'm supposed to be watching Chicago/NE Cable CSR: What's the difference? Me: Fuck you and go die in a fire, cunt
According to Mucky's report about Engalnd-Belgium and given the quality on display here so far, it may be an apt question.
Give Brodeur credit: it only took him 3 more years than Patrick Roy even played to break all his records .
The first half was poor but this half is actually pretty good. I think the lack of atmosphere and low production values make it seem worse than it is.
If MLS is going to have a week with just one game, then they could at least make some effort to avoid that one game being, well, like this game: basically uninteresting except to fans of the teams involved, and probably uninteresting even to a lot of them if they're being honest. Have the one game be a nice, established big rivalry game with guaranteed away support: Portland and Seattle, LA and San Jose, LA and Chivas, NY and DC -- something like that. But not Chicago at New England!
Can these teams just sign Cuah, Dempsey and Ralston to 30-minute contracts? Then bring on Rolfe and we may have an actual game on our hands again.
Rochester used to be the crown jewel of lower division soccer. That stadium with it's old-looking turf is now a sad picture of itself.