Dutch players at home and abroad worthy to be tracked in connection with the Dutch NT - Part 2

Discussion in 'The Netherlands' started by DRB300, Mar 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands

    [​IMG]

    According to this source (Kicker) he played 21 games for them (21 Speile) and in those appearances he only has to allow Hummels in front of him. Now this is just one source.

    In this source (Bild) he is also noted as one of the best defenders:

    [​IMG]

    Look at number 6 this time. Apparently he has done some things right this season. I understand he can have overachieved in those 21 games and his base level is lower, but we are talking here about a spot for a senior member that went to Bouma. I don't take Bouma serious anymore after all the gaffs in the PSV defense, so why not Brouwers if he has done quite well?
     
  2. curbo

    curbo Member

    Apr 14, 2012
    Club:
    Feyenoord
    Always a suprise how the dutchies who didnt ''get big'' in the eredivise dont get any kind of publicity here.. I can understand that BVM wouldnt want to suddenly call up a veteran but never-NT player for the sole reason that he would be completely new to this NT. Its the best team you want, not neccersarily the best players.
    But... Bouma?... Should have taken the risk anyway for Brouwers tbh, but thats just me.

    As for the goalies, we already have 3 set in stone proven goalkeepers. Makes sense to me to give 2 promising youngsters the little trainingexperience instead of a Vermeer.
     
  3. PuckVanHeel

    PuckVanHeel BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Oct 4, 2011
    Club:
    Feyenoord
    I read in the weekend the Rinus Michels biography. It also covered the crisis of Dutch football in the early 80s in terms of talent development. Two of the main problems were the deteriorating state of amateur-football and the lack of coherence and priority in/of that branch. So that had to be tackled because amateur-football was and is the lifeblood of the Dutch game.
    The other problem was that the league became defensive and reactive in orientation, which initiated a vicious circle: reactive football was not good for the development of talents (esp. in term of decision-making and positional awareness) and this in turn caused a further promotion of careful tactics. So, Rinus Michels tried to implement some pro-active spirit and approaches.

    I thought: maybe this is interesting to share because it is often an returning subject. Some like 'johan neeskens' here believe that 'weak' generations are just accidents but I think that these weak generations reflect underlying trends TBH.
     
    JC-14 repped this.
  4. PuckVanHeel

    PuckVanHeel BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Oct 4, 2011
    Club:
    Feyenoord
    I don't understand why Strootman is called up. His form has definitely worsened in the second half of the season while Clasie is becoming better and better.
     
  5. TFC Ajax

    TFC Ajax Member+

    Mar 20, 2011
    Greater Toronto Area
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    It really bugs me that Brouwers wasn't considered, but Bouma is. Defense isn't exactly an area where we can afford to be choosy and leave one of the best defenders in the Bundesliga at home on the basis of him never having been tried before.
    I just can't wrap my mind around the fact that we have two weak positions, then suddenly a guy who plays that position shows up out of nowhere and becomes one of the best players in that position in the third best league in europe - And we completely ignore him.
    To put that into another perspective: Imagine if van Persie didn't exist and Huntelaar was off the radar up until the beginning of this season. In this case, the Dutch NT would still be using RVN as the first choice #9. Then Huntelaar has the season that he had, and should in every way be called up and used in the starting XI. But then BvM - using the same reasoning for leaving out Brouwers - leaves him out of the selection and uses an ancient van Nistelrooy as the first choice striker for the Euros, backed up by Kuyt and some kids. <- That's how ridiculous this is
     
  6. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    Well van Marwijk has pretty much no answers for the left back position. Tofy he was in a a show for one and a half hours and basicly he points out there are 2 kids without international experience:

    1. Willems
    2. Buttner
    Together with 2 players with international experience but have not played on that position for many years or only recently did:

    1. Emanuelson
    2. Schaars
    And oh yeah, Anita also can play there he added. Now I am not sure he mentioned Bouma too, but I probably wasn't able to compute that.

    So basically he wants to play one of these players there. This is the group. Of course I immediately wrote an email to the program, but it was not selected. The clowns around the table have not asked 1 relevant question and were more concerned with the self promotion of their stupid CD.

    Emanuelson played horrible against Hungary at home when he replaced Pieters. He is not good there. As Drenthe is not good. Schaars pretty much got owned against England but Bertje thought he was not that bad. Schaars was also slow IMO. That's inconvenient against Nani and Mueller.

    Now I don't even go into Willems and Buttner. When were they ever tested against international class? Yes against Valencia. What happened with Willems? This is getting silly.

    When you don't know what to do, you throw everything at a problem and see what sticks. That's what you do. This problem was clear from the day Gio left. He should have tried out Kuyt, Afellay, de Jong, Mathijsen and all new talents at that position. All left backs that play there for their club are lightweights. The question I send was about Viergever. I want him to be tested on left back. Viergever was the best Dutch defender in the Eredivisie.

    Van Marwijk has lost the plot on left back the moment his plan was to go to war with Pieters on that spot. He said today the same. Pieters would have been his nr 1 choice. Braafheid is probably better than all 4 of those names. He outplayed Shakiri against Switzerland. I don't see any of those 4 do that. I get Dick Advocaat 2004 flasbacks at the moment.
     
  7. TFC Ajax

    TFC Ajax Member+

    Mar 20, 2011
    Greater Toronto Area
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/van-marwijk-unsure-whether-van-212000211--sow.html
    BVM says that he hasn't decided if both RVP and Hunter will play or not. IMO it would be a huge slap in the face to which ever one doesn't get played if they don't both get to play. At this point dropping either one in favour of any other winger is inexcusable. And we all know which winger will take the spot of that dropped striker...
     
  8. echo201

    echo201 Member

    Mar 17, 2012
    Club:
    12 de Octubre
    Yes , i think so ,we should discuss about football.
    Disussing art is great,but maybe not here.:)
     
  9. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    And Strootman has a knee problem nobody seems to talk about. So van Marwijk is prepared to take an injured player with him. If that knee plays up in the Euro and Strootman is unable to play or underperforms big time as a result of it, van Marwijk is to blame. He is well aware of that problem.
     
  10. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands

    Well on one thing I agree with him and that is his hands are not tight to put Huntelaar and RVP both in the team. They also played both against Finland and funny enough were both the worst players on the field. Elia and Luuk de Jong that came on, where a huge improvement. We follow players throughout the year and love to see them both in the team, bit his job is to do what is best for the balance of the team and the final result. There is a pundit on Dutch TV that came with the following line up:

    [​IMG]


    If this would be the line up, I would play Afellay on left back as he is a better player, has even more lungs than Emanuelson and is more robust. I don't care he has not played there. The fact Emanuelson is played at left back means attacking intentions anyway and I have never been impressed by his defensive quality's. I even think Emanuelson was put there at his Ajax years because he was a general good player that could function at multiple positions. That's the same with Afellay. Is also a general good player that can deal with multiple positions. So:

    [​IMG]

    Basically Sneijder will become some kind of Beckam, but then on the left side. Crossing the ball in or giving through passes at both Hunter and Robin.

    This is not my number 1 line up, far from it maybe even, but it does provide an opportunity to have all the major players in one team. You can even throw in VDV in DM against Denmark.
     
  11. Orange14

    Orange14 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 27, 2007
    Bethesda, MD
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    The only way to compensate for the left back problem is to go to a more ball control offensive lineup (the classical Dutch approach which BvM has conveniently forgotten about). Barca played all season with holes at the left back because of Abidal's liver transplant and they did pretty well. Of course this means having a midfield that is more dynamic than the one we currently have. My preference is still to go back to a 4-3-3 with a midfield of Anita, Clasie, and Sneijder that could really dominate ball possession (Anita would do the primary defensive duties). van Bommel and de Jong are either too slow in the case of the former or poor on the ball in the case of the latter) I would start van Persie, Huntelaar and Robben up fron with van Persie and Robben exchanging wing positions often during the game (too bad they are both left footed). Honestly, I don't know what to do about the left back position (maybe call up Daley Blind???;)) as none of the options are too appealing.
     
  12. vagegast

    vagegast Member

    Sep 25, 2004
    Herndon, VA
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    Braafheid lost his starting spot, last I checked. What's his reason to play, he played 6 minutes in the World Cup final? Let's not grand stand and act as if a lack of left backs (something that's been quite chronic) is van Marwijk's fault. Even Pieters was pretty bad but he's had at least some experience at a higher level than the Eredivisie.

    Strootman has actually played international games. Clasie has had one good season. You cannot just throw out experience out the window and throw a Eredivisie level player up against the Germans and Portuguese.
    There's always Schaars or De Jong.
     
  13. PuckVanHeel

    PuckVanHeel BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Oct 4, 2011
    Club:
    Feyenoord
    Experience is way overrated. Had Cocu expierence when he started in 1998? No.

    Yes, Strootman has experience and failed. His level has declined visibly. There is no need to be worried with such an amount of experience elsewhere on the pitch.
     
  14. PuckVanHeel

    PuckVanHeel BigSoccer Yellow Card

    Oct 4, 2011
    Club:
    Feyenoord
    Netherlands had rarely a good natural left-back. All good left-backs of the past were transformed left-backs, because it is such an specialistic position. It is even detrimental for the development of players to specialize them as left-back at an early age.

    Instead of calling-up third-rate left-backs, one should simply accept this IMO
     
  15. vagegast

    vagegast Member

    Sep 25, 2004
    Herndon, VA
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    Cocu had 282 Eredivisie games under his belt by the end of the '98 season. He also got his start in Oranje in '96.
     
  16. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    I said what I said. Braafheid was able to take care of Shaqiri. I have yet to see if the other 4/5 options are able to do that. Emanuelson was horrible against Hungary on the left back. Hungary ... . Schaars got owned against England. Sturridge free chance and with the second goal it didn't look good either. Attacking wise I have not seen him. Pieters was bad in that game also. Willems and Buttner? Well Willems has been owned in pretty much all games defensive wise. Buttner is so low profile that I only have seen him in maybe 180 minutes this year. I still don't have a clear picture of him. Bouma = lol. Anita was not special for Ajax until he was moved to DM. Left back makes him mediocre.

    Why do I bring in Braafheid? Would I settle for him? No. Of course not. But he was able to cope with opponents 1 division lower than Germany. Switzerland is a pretty good team. However against Germany he was trashed. What makes us think the other 4/5 options won't? We want to burn that kid for his failing, but reality is who exactly would have done better?

    I blame van Marwijk for not anticipating and seeing what we all saw. Pieters and and all the rest are not good enough. He was caught against England with his Schaars move. What was that? That was him exploring options. Creating a plan B. So he now sees reasons to work on them right before the Euro, where the urgency has always been there in the first place. We need an international proven top player there, that we can miss on the front. Kuijt, Afellay, Nigel de Jong. Afellay is the multiple positions player of our Orange generation. Like Cocu was that back in the day. You have players like that. You could put Cocu in as keeper and he would still not let you down. Afellay is a bit the same. However now everybody says, he never played there. Apparently for putting Schaars there the reason gets suspended.


    2 seasons. He has played pretty much all games at Excelsior in Eredivisie and stood out so much that national programs payed attention to him, where they normally dismiss the low teams.

    Buttner and Willems?

    Well, yeah, but his knee problem has been linked as the reason of his weak second half of the season. Strootman will have to be operated before or after the Euro. We basically take an half fit player with us, because he has played a few handful of NT games and European games. Note that the reason PSV failed also against pretty much all top teams was because of the low handling speed of Strootman and Wijnaldum. The reason Feyenoord did so well against top opposition was because of the high handling speed of Clasie. The stronger the opposition, the bigger the pressure, the more important high handling speed will become to football your way out of the pressure, the bigger Clasie will be. Experience will never magically solve natural limitations. I will choose Clasie's natural higher operational speed ability against a half fit, lower operational speed Strootman, that happens to have played some more games on international level any day of the week. Clasie ended up at the top group in many ranking lists and has been maybe the most consistent player in Eredivisie. That's a very important indicator for maturity as well Vagegast.
     

  17. I have been posting that since about 3 years ago until recently a few weeks ago. In fact it is what we played with Gio, as he was more of a midfielder than a back.
     
  18. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    Adam Maher is chosen as talent of the year:


    [​IMG]


    The panel consisted of the following names:

    • Bert van Marwijk
    • Ronald Koeman
    • Frank de Boer
    • Youri Mulder
    • Jan van Halst
    • Phillip Cocu
    • Willy Dullens
    • Ron Jans
    • Wim Jonk
    • Johan Cruijff

    The previous winners have been:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    Now Maher can add his name to this group. Most players on this list have made a good living, so the future looks bright for little Adam. Some have become Oke players, some have become world stars, so enough questions remain what his ceiling will be.
     
  19. Orange14

    Orange14 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 27, 2007
    Bethesda, MD
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    Clasie is better than Maher.
     
    vagegast repped this.
  20. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    I agree Orange14.

    Maher was in the pocket of Clasie in the recent AZ - Feyenoord match, but Clasie has already become second in the Election for Eredivisie player of the year:

    [​IMG]


    Third in the Gilette ranking:

    [​IMG]


    First in the Elf ranking:

    [​IMG]

    Only player in top 3 of all 3 lists.

    I think the panel wanted to give the price to encourage and honor a very young player of 18 years old.
     
  21. thatkid

    thatkid Member

    Jun 21, 2010
    Netherlands
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    I don't understand all this "hate" for Maher.. Whenever something good happens to this kid, like getting a call from Orange or winning an award or anything like that and someone has to point out how much better Clasie is.. Why?

    ...I'm just say'n, Clasie is great but so is Maher.

    And this is just a personal award from Johan Cruijff.. Why do you need to point out how Clasie is #3 on Gillette Pro Klassement? Why does that even matter? This is just what Johan Cruijff thinks. Why even give a S*it? What does he know about talented players, right? :)
     
  22. Orange14

    Orange14 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 27, 2007
    Bethesda, MD
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    There is no hate at all for Maher (in fact I cannot think of any player that I "hate"). I'm just questioning BvM's call up of him vs. Clasie. I just think that Clasie is a better player.
     
  23. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands

    I guess the toes are long. Why not take one more second and scroll up to see who dedicated quite a long post on his achievement in the first place. I don't see others mentioning what he pulls off.

    Orange14 makes a correct remark, so I explain how Clasie is already named with other honors and how Maher is only 18 years old. Maher is the biggest talent in the Netherlands. I agree with that. He is not the best player in the Eredivisie. I thought maybe Orange14 misunderstood this. So I post lists to create even more clarity on the matter.

    "Hate" is the worst description of someone taking the time to point others out how a player is valued and appreciated. Actually I see Maher and Clasie both in the future midfield of the Dutch NT side by side. Calm down.
     
  24. DRB300

    DRB300 Member+

    Sep 21, 2007
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    There is one interesting thing about this discussion. For what spot has BvM selected Maher?

    1. For one of the 2 DM spots?
    2. For the 1 AM spot?
    I am curious to what people think.
     
  25. TFC Ajax

    TFC Ajax Member+

    Mar 20, 2011
    Greater Toronto Area
    Club:
    AFC Ajax
    Nat'l Team:
    Netherlands
    For me the question isn't why did Maher get called over Clasie. The question is why did Strootman get called up over Clasie?
     

Share This Page